...As I previously showed in this thread, during the final two weeks of 2016, Trump had clear signs of strong momentum in several key states (as well as nationally)...
...But his year, during the same period, Trump has only gained more than 1 point on Biden in AZ, IA and MN. Nationally, there's been a mild tightening, with Biden retaining a healthy lead and 50+% vote share...
...It's easier to discount the possibility of some late-breaking, game-changing, hard-to-spot development because Trump has been significantly behind Biden *the entire time.* Biden has led wire-to-wire in RCP since tracking began in Sept. '19, never holding a lead less than 4...
...Plus, Trump has held underwater job approval ratings *his entire presidency* even when the economy was growing. Most Americans were already tired of his divisive behavior before the pandemic struck, and nothing has changed since...
...This is why I deemed it important to state the case clearly before the votes are counted. There should be no spin that late events dictated the outcome, or that Trump would have won if not for the misfortune of the initial pandemic or the 3rd Covid spike...
...If anything, the pandemic was a political *opportunity* to turn Trump's fortunes around. A responsible handling of the crisis would have put to rest concerns that swing voters held about his character and competence. But he chose to double down on division...
...Therefore, tomorrow's outcome can be seen from miles, and days, away. To deny that is a recipe for faulty post-election analysis, based on ground game tactics, ad spending, final speeches and late-breaking news...
...Republicans, in particular, should not spin themselves. Trump, and Trumpism, was a disaster from start to finish. If they have any interest in becoming a majority party, they need to bury Trumpism, reject the politics of division and get serious about governing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In this November 3, 2016 lecture Amy Coney Barrett, speaking more like an analyst than an advocate, said the following about the future of Roe...
"I think people phrase the abortion question, when they think about the Supreme Court, as, 'is Roe vs. Wade going to be overruled?' ...
...We've had 30-plus years of a Court that did take, on the whole, a more conservative approach to the judicial role, and ... Casey vs. Pennsylvania, left Roe largely intact .. I don't think that abortion, or the right to abortion, would change ...
The MN-02 House race will be DELAYED until FEB 9 because the 38-year-old candidate from the Legal Marijuana Now Party died, that's a "major party" in MN, and the law says, "If a major party nominee dies within 79 days of Election Day" you get a special on the 2nd Tues in Feb...
...that's a law enacted in the wake of Paul Wellstone's death, which happened shortly before the 2002 election.