If Ds are less likely to vote in-person this year than Rs due to COVID, and only (say) 80% of those would have voted in-person actually end up voting by mail, that could mean a big partisan swing to Republicans.
This *may* be what 538 is missing. 🧵
Put another way: whenever you convert from one channel to another, like going from in-person to mail, you will lose some fraction of people.
If a much larger share of Ds are doing that conversion this year than Rs, they lose more votes. That could be the big unmodeled factor.
I looked at how 538 modeled COVID's impact on turnout. It appears they model COVID’s impact solely as higher uncertainty. But not as a partisan factor that favors Rs who will vote in-person more than Ds because they are less concerned about COVID. fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-f…
In-person attendance at rallies seems to support this hypothesis. Both Biden and Trump agree that Trump rallies are much more heavily attended than Biden rallies. So, COVID may be a large partisan factor on in-person turnout. archive.is/ep1vI
COVID may have a partisan impact on ground game too.
"Part of the problem, according to...a dozen Democratic elected officials and operatives, is the Biden campaign‘s decision to discourage field staff from knocking on doors during the pandemic" politico.com/news/2020/10/2…
Note that this is different from @mendelsohn’s model of mail-in ballots on vote totals, though you should look at that too if you're interested in this topic.
PS: I am expressly not taking any position on the US election. But I am interested in the gap between 538 and prediction markets, and the partisan impact of COVID on in-person turnout *may* be the factor that current models aren’t taking into account. Only a hypothesis, though.
Btw, studies seem to differ on whether mail-in voting boosts turnout or not. Interestingly, those who are *assigned* to vote by mail seem to have less turnout in one study, which is kind of like the COVID effect. cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Really illustrates some key concepts, including (a) that technically literate people should be writing & reporting on tech, (b) there’s plenty of talent out there internationally we haven’t tapped, and (c) we can do so much better.
This whole series of articles is some of the best tech journalism I’ve ever seen. Because it’s not all gossip columns and funding rounds. The reader actually learns something. It’s like @QuantaMagazine but for tech. welcometothejungle.com/en/collections…
The future is Communist Capital vs Woke Capital vs Crypto Capital.
Each represents a left/right fusion that’s bizarre by the standards of the 1980s consensus.
It’s PRC vs MMT vs BTC.
Communist Capital is the ideology of the Chinese Communist Party. It’s capitalism checked by the centralized power of the Chinese state, as pithily summarized here. quillette.com/2020/10/10/is-…
Media corporations are slowly realizing that leverage has shifted.
You don’t need to give free content to Bezos, Sulzberger, or Murdoch employees to get the word out anymore.
Just build your own audience, and go direct if you have something to say. cjr.org/public_editor/…
You no longer need to pay a toll to a media middleman to reach an audience. You don’t need them at all.
“The internet...destroyed one of the media’s most important sources of power: being the only place that could offer access to an audience.” cjr.org/public_editor/…
The new vanity metric is vanity media. You simply do not need legacy media coverage to reach an audience. It’s junk traffic.
Absolutely agree that workers should share in the upside of these platforms.
But a state that fails at basic functions like police, fire, public health, education, sanitation isn’t capable of competent regulation. That’s why AB5 was a disaster.
I’m very sympathetic to @ljin18 and @dumplicious’s points about making sure workers share upside.
Had Uber been able to give equity to all 1M drivers, perhaps they’d be a $100B company with $50B owned by drivers at ~$50k/driver.
A happier and economically aligned workforce.
So what eventually happens is that all these platforms get turned into crypto protocols.
Every rider and driver now share in the upside. And due to encryption, voluntary transactions between two parties can no longer be surveilled and interdicted by the state.