Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the Supreme Court to hear a plea against the practice of putting up COVID19 positive posters outsides the homes of people who are found to be positive & in isolation.
Delhi High Court begins hearing on Mohit Saraf-Rajiv Luthra dispute #SarafvLuthra#DelhiHC
The Court had earlier asked the parties to try mediation to resolve their differences and appointed Senior Advocate Sriram Panchu as the mediator. On Monday, Justice V Kameswar Rao was informed that mediation had failed.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi arguing for Saraf. Speaks about 90-day notice for expulsion from firm.
#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI SA Bobde hears plea filed against Jharkhand Rajya Sabha hopeful Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia @PradeepSonthali against election of sitting RS member Dhiraj Prasad Sahu.
Petition in Supreme Court says Sahu "illegally occupying chair"
Petition seeks orders to Election Commission to submit voting numbers before SC. Claims that Sonthalia had recieved more votes, voter had been disqualified from assembly.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appears for Sonthalia.
CJI SA Bobde led bench of the #SupremeCourt to pass orders on “segmented” tariffs, plans offered by telecom operators to a targeted slice of their subscribers.
Segmented tariffs are plans offered to users who wish to leave a network as retention sops.
The plea by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), seeks details from Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea on segmented, or specific, offers made by the telecom companies to their subscribers.
The plea was opposed by telecom companies Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea on the ground that it would violate commercial confidentiality and help rivals poach their subscribers. @airtelnews@vodafone
[Transwoman's plea against exclusion of transgender persons from NCC enrollment] Kerala High Court will hear the matter on Thursday next week. barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Today, the Court queried the Central Government Counsel on why the petitioner's application for enrollment as a female was being denied.
This was unacceptable, especially as the person identified as female and the female category was recognised by the NCC Act.
The Counsel submitted that the NCC's objections were to the fact that she was a transperson, but that he needed further instructions on the exact nature of their objections.