In 2000, @algore asked to recount only 4 Dem-majority counties hoping to get votes; he wanted ballot rule changes and he wanted to stop military ballots. SCOTUS stopped his fraud.
He/Dems/Media then spent years claiming Bush “stole” the election.
Gore 2000 was an easier stoey than Trump 2020 because it was just one state; one state that if won decided the presidency; the margins were a few 100 votes, and major media enabled a challenge while here they are kneecapping Trump.
The game is over.
BTW my pre-elex prediction:
If Trump wins GA; IIIFFF he wins AZ, then the race came down to PA (if NC is also with Trump), so yes. Looking at mail in ballots in that one state does make sense and perhaps in WI too where the diff is 20K votes. But alas, some @SenateGOP’s are already undercutting Trump.
The main potential fraud with mail ins is not the count. The issue is that unsolicited ballots were mailed to addresses where people have moved from or who are dead. Thousands in key states potentially abused this with a net for Dems since Dems have a strong majority in ballots.
I did the math: Biden won WI by 20,000. For the race to be even, there needs to be 50,000 fraud votes of which 70% are for Biden and 30% for Trump.
So... even in close states, the fraud level needs to be very high to change the outcome by a fraction.
Tough PR road for Trump.
In WI for argument sakes:
20K Biden lead.
50K fraud votes.
70% Biden’s side (since he led mail-ins by large margins).
35K cur for Biden; now trails by 15,000.
15,000 vote cur for Trump due to 30% of the fraud being on his side.
Race tied.
Almost impossible to reach this.
I think there should be an audit of mail in ballots either by state governments and/or by the federal government, and there will very likely be many thousands of prosecutable cases in many states. However the above math illustrates the challenge in terms of changing the outcome.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is why Liberals are not fully happy with the 2020 results:
Their writers and pundits spent years yelling that @realDonaldTrump is divisive and racist and that he won 2016 due to middle America whites who are racists. The Leftists also claimed that changing demographics will
be Trump’s undoing and it will take down the whole GOP with him. Trump however increased his 2020 vote total by 15% from 2016 thanks to help from monitories while Biden won due to vote of the aforementioned whites who Libs claimed are racists. Worse, Biden’s electoral margin
will echo Trump’s margin of 2016 or less (depending how GA and AZ end up), and this was during a pandemic; during an economic downturn; with a mass mail-in vote system that massively favors Dems, and despite tech companies choking off conservative voices in ways not done to Libs.
Pre-2012, @NumbersMuncher unskewing polls. If not for pro-Obama Sandy coverage, I think he would be proven right as seen from anti-GOP polling messes since). But at the time, the Muncher looked bad so he went off Twitter for a while. Why is @Redistrict not in hiding for a week?
One day before the 2020 election, Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) wrote that @HouseDemocrats will pick up a net 10-15 seats in the House. They lost 5-12.
“Where is the accountability” you ask? By you RTing this and showing it to political “reporters” who parrot Wasserman.
A night before the 2020 election, Charles Cook told @Lawrence that @SenateDems will pick up anywhere from 2-3 to 5-7 seats.
Dems seem to be getting at best a net of 3 if they crush the GOP in the GA runoffs.
The whole news business went along with the conspiracy (went along? Pushed for three years) that Russia made Trump POTUS; that Trump’s presidency is illegitimate due to it. Yet when Trump raises issues about an election days after the election, those same actors pounce?
Frauds!
The people in this video and/or their employers fueled a Dem-funded conspiracy about Russia for three years. See what they yell now:
“Why are you lying to the American people about that” (vote fraud)?
In 9 swing states in 2016 (WI, IA, OH, MI, PA, NC, FL, AZ, NV) Trump beat the polls on average by 2.9 points
Now the beat average in those states is 3.3; which is a marginal difference, but the average does not say the real story where it mattered most. Consider:
In 2016, Trump beat the PA average by 2.8 but now it’s in the 0.5 range; depending on the final outcome. This change is the diff between winning/losing a state.
In 2016, he beat MI’s average by 3.9 but now only 1.6 and lost.
WI in 2016 he beat by 7.2; now it’s 6.2’ish and lost.
Trump’s 2016 win in WI was 0.7; now a loss of 0.6.
Trump fans’ hope for a Trump win was that Trump, on average, will beat polls by better margins than 2016 but among the 9 listed states the beat is almost the same, and Trump was weaker in key states and indeed lost there.
Think of all the media coverage of Trump since mid-2015; think of how many Biden stories were buried, and think of the massive censorship done by Big Tech of GOP/Conservative voices.
Then think of the fact that Biden did not clean house tonight.
The last few days there was outrage on the idea of Trump coming out election night to suggest that he is a winner. Trump folded and canceled any such talk.
But just like that Biden is speaking now and suggesting that he is in a strong position.
Imagine Trump did it B4 Biden.
Now that Biden spoke, Trump tweets that he too will speak.