“Wanted by ICE*”
(Just not badly enough to go to a neutral magistrate and get a warrant because that’s how much we care about the public safety mission we say we serve: We are literally not willing to just go get a warrant for a guy we put on a billboard.)
(Just not badly enough to go to a neutral magistrate and get a warrant because that’s how much we care about the public safety mission we say we serve: We are literally not willing to just go get a warrant for a guy we put on a billboard.)
https://twitter.com/icegov/status/1324844897371914242
ICE pretends the Fourth Amendment has nothing to do with public safety. They want the people reading this billboard to be okay in a world where their agents can arrest anyone, anytime, anywhere. Don’t worry, though, just “bad” guys. (And some kids)
A #FOIA I’ve been meaning to do but have to admit to myself I won’t is to seek the Fugitive Operations Worksheet or Field Operation Worksheet for the FugOps teams who are supposed to be looking for guys like this man and then measure them against ICE’s effort to pick a scary face
Give the new data from sanctuary jurisdictions showing public safety actually increases when ICE’s unaccountable cooptation of local resources stops, seems like saying sanctuary cities are a risk to public safety no longer passes muster under the Information Quality Act.
One of the families we’re supporting in the #DetentionKills network still reels from the fact that ICE arrested the man who died based on charges a judge basically laughed out of court.
ICE doesn’t just want to eviscerate the Fourth Amendment, but the presumption of innocence.
ICE doesn’t just want to eviscerate the Fourth Amendment, but the presumption of innocence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
