Okay, quick explanation of why the arts are just as important as STEM.

No, it’s not because rich people things lead to networking opportunities.

It’s because of how the brain develops.

You’ll understand public ed better than most politicians in a few seconds.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Think of the brain as a mess of wires that send information.

These wires are called synapses, and are how electrical impulses communicate information. The more wires, the more information can be processed.

Kinda like internet bandwidth.
3/ Young children have a whack of these wires. They need it. They’re learning a lot of new things, like walking and speaking.

As you repeat tasks, your brain becomes more efficient at doing them. As your brain becomes more efficient, you need less bandwidth to process info.
4/ So your brain undergoes a process called synaptic pruning. Your body starts to cut the wires, leading to fewer synapses.

Most of the loss is during "regulatory" pruning. You'll hopefully never need to learn to walk again, so the brain scraps the recipe to learn it.
5/ The more a child become “efficient,” the more pruning occurs.

As kids hit adolescence, pruning slows down dramatically.

When they're in their 20s, it's thought to totally stop.

This means the years up to the 20s becomes crucial in how people think for LIFE.
6/ People exposed to a variety of experiences in their youth, need the most synapses. The more varied the experiences, the better.

Music, visual arts, exploring, reading, writing, literature, comics, imaginary friends, coding... The more, the better off later.
7/ Kids that stick to the same experiences, with the least stimulation, need fewer synapses.

Going to school, doing the bare minimum, a low intensity schedule back home, etc. leads to more "efficiency."

The pruning that occurs to make them more efficient is *permanent.*
8/ This means over the long term, kids with the most varied childhoods are likely to have an easier time adapting to new experiences in adulthood, leading to an easier time in life in general.

Those with the most routine exposure, are likely to have a harder time adapting.
9/ In other words, reduction in these programs are a permanent loss to societal potential.

The worse the system does, the more society becomes dependent on parents needing to take this role.

This produces an inequality gap, we pay for later.
10/ I maintain anyone can learn anything, at any age.

Some people just have to work a lot harder than others, due to how they were setup.

As society rapidly shifts, some people will rapidly adapt and thrive. Those that didn’t, become a liability for society later on.
11/ When politicians start to say they’re eliminating arts, and focusing on STEM. It sounds like a good idea.

Unfortunately, all research in this area indicates it produces more efficient workers that can take directions.

Not smarter children.
That’s a cheat sheet for an expensive lesson I learned, after years of research.

If you’re wondering why I spent so much time and money on it, I’m the Stephen Punwasi in this article.

I’m also formally trained in the fine arts, culinary arts, computer science, and finance. 😉

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Punwasi

Stephen Punwasi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenPunwasi

9 Nov
Alright, let's do an important investment and career lesson. Opportunity cost.

This is factoring the cost of not doing something in your total loss.

Trust me, you're going to look at money differently after this.

It's also why I don't like real estate as an investment.

🧵👇
2/ Basically, you're not just including any money spent – you're also including money not made.

Let's say you're a student, and you get free tickets to a concert. These tickets are normally $50, so it's like you just got free money.

Unfortunately, you work that day...
3/ So you give your shift to a co-worker, and skip out on a 4 hour shift you normally work.

Most people would think, "I just went to a concert for free, yo. I only spent $50 on drinks!"

True. You only spent $50. Unfortunately, you didn't make $80 at work that day.
Read 13 tweets
5 Nov
Pst... my threads aren’t random.

A few people have told me they appreciate the randomness of my threads.

Some threads seem like they’re social justice-y.

Some threads seem like they’re about making money.

They’re actually all about labor, wealth, and inequality.
2/ Take my thread on Home Children. Canada used over 100,000 children as indentured slaves.

We’re told they were shipped to 🇨🇦 for a better life.

BS.

They were shipped because 🇨🇦 needed *cheap* labor.

Criminals were literally sent to do the same thing as punishment.
3/ It’s actually a thread on how the early European Canadians got a head start on the backs of others.

A similar lesson is found in my thread on HBC. They weren’t here to find homies, they were a company looking to pillage and plunder.
Read 8 tweets
4 Nov
Quick rant on knowledge shaming. 👨‍🏫

When I explain something, I explain it assuming the other person has ZERO knowledge.

It doesn’t matter if the person is a 14 year old, or a fund manager that summoned me to challenge an area he’s an expert in.

I just do. 1/5
2/ It’s easier for everyone to have important details repeated, than for them to figure out what they’re missing.

Not everyone has the same background.

This can be for any reason, from cultural upringing, to socioeconomic status, to a lack of prior interest.
3/ It doesn’t matter why they didn’t know the bit of info. It’s just important they know it now.

When you respond to a fact someone finds interesting with, “how could you not know that?”

... you *think* it makes you look smart. Really it just makes you a dick.
Read 6 tweets
4 Nov
Okay, do y'all know what "Home Children" are? 🙋‍♂️

I'm a 🇨🇦 history nerd, and literally had no idea what this was until this morning.

It turns out it's a weird and twisted part of history, 🇨🇦 plays an active role in hiding.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Basically if you were an orphan in the UK or commonwealth, you were rounded up and used as a slave.

This also happened to poor families that were tricked into giving up their kids "temporarily" into better care, only to come back and find out their kids were gone.
3/ Eventually there was too many kids, so they decided they would export them.

"Parents" in countries like Canada would go to homes, pay an "adoption fee," and get kids under indentured contracts.
Read 11 tweets
3 Nov
Who wants a quick thread on money laundering with cars? 🙋‍♂️

You might have noticed 🇨🇦 cities known for money laundering also have a large number of luxury vehicles.

Recently they discovered part of this has to do with the cars being used to launder.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ It's stupid easy. You buy a car with a bag of cash, then sell the car back to the dealership a year later.

Dealerships aren't equipped to determine how you got the money. They don't have the resources or training.
3/ You could be a dad who saved $100/week to buy the car of your dream, or a guy that just chopped someone up with a cleaver for $250k. They have no clue.

The money goes into the dealership's account, where it's processed as legit business, and you drive away with a super car.
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov
The difference between 🇨🇦 and the 🇺🇸 in terms of libel is something every Canadians should know.

In 🇺🇸, defendants are considered innocent until proven otherwise.

In 🇨🇦, the defendant is basically lying until proven otherwise.

Now this is *super* important.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ You're thinking, if you're going to say something, it should be true. Correct.

However, you need to be able to prove it in court *legally.*

Money disappeared, and the person in charge of it has the exact amount in their pocket? May not be enough evidence.
3/ This slants what issues get covered, and challenged in Canada. A media company, and some journalists, will not touch certain people and companies because they have deep pockets.

Yes, you will be reimbursed if you win. You still need to front the funds for defense.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!