Alright, let's do an important investment and career lesson. Opportunity cost.

This is factoring the cost of not doing something in your total loss.

Trust me, you're going to look at money differently after this.

It's also why I don't like real estate as an investment.

🧵👇
2/ Basically, you're not just including any money spent – you're also including money not made.

Let's say you're a student, and you get free tickets to a concert. These tickets are normally $50, so it's like you just got free money.

Unfortunately, you work that day...
3/ So you give your shift to a co-worker, and skip out on a 4 hour shift you normally work.

Most people would think, "I just went to a concert for free, yo. I only spent $50 on drinks!"

True. You only spent $50. Unfortunately, you didn't make $80 at work that day.
4/ In other words, your loss is $50 spent, and $80 missed in wages. Total economic losses are $130, 160% higher than you thought.

Now I know a lot of people that rent, despite being able to afford it. Some make a house per week in wages.

Why not? Got it. Opportunity cost.
5/ Most of the people in this demographic fall into two categories – professional investors, and entrepreneurs.

Both are people that very clearly understand the value of money.

Let's run the numbers on why these folks don't have houses, and rent.
6/ Assume they bought a benchmark (typical) detached home in Toronto for $1,163,300 in January.

They put 33% down, @ 2%. By October, they would have made $103,900 in price gains (unusual year), and paid $12,880 in interest.

Gains = $91,020 = ~23%.

Sounds good, right?
7/ These folks are investors though. So the other option is they spend that downpayment on equities.

NASDAQ year to date performance is 32.57%.

Let's say they take the same downpayment, and pull a margin at 3x paying the same interest.
8/ That same $387,379 calculations.

Interest at 1%: -$7,759.21
Gross Return: $378,886
Net return: $371,126, or 97.80%

"But they pay rent, so it's even!"

Not even close, sometimes.

Let's say they spent $50k ($5k/month), they'd be left with $328,886 or 84.90% return.
9/ Here's the key difference between rich people and middle class people though.

Middle class dude with a house thinks he made $91,020.

Investor that rents thinks buddy with the house didn't do so hot. His opportunity cost was $237,866.

Not including agent commissions.
10/ Now this applies to every fucking thing in your life.

Let's say you make $60,000/year, and it adjusts with inflation. Call it Job A.

Let's say you can find a job that makes $80k/year, but you would lose a year of work, and $20k in tuition. Call it job B.
11/ The next 10 years of your life at both jobs.

Job A = $60k * 10 years = $600,000.

Job B = ($80k * 9 years) - ($20k) = $700,000

You think it costs $80k to do the training.

It really cost $100k to not.

After that, the gap keeps getting bigger.
btw.

I also did a rant on the value of time, and why eating out isn’t always a waste of time.

Same energy.
12/ Oh, I should also mention – sometimes it's totally worth it to take the loss.

The concert in the example above? I totally would have done it as a kid, knowing the economic losses.

The point is, thinking this way helps you understand understand how *you* value your time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Punwasi

Stephen Punwasi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenPunwasi

8 Nov
Okay, quick explanation of why the arts are just as important as STEM.

No, it’s not because rich people things lead to networking opportunities.

It’s because of how the brain develops.

You’ll understand public ed better than most politicians in a few seconds.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Think of the brain as a mess of wires that send information.

These wires are called synapses, and are how electrical impulses communicate information. The more wires, the more information can be processed.

Kinda like internet bandwidth.
3/ Young children have a whack of these wires. They need it. They’re learning a lot of new things, like walking and speaking.

As you repeat tasks, your brain becomes more efficient at doing them. As your brain becomes more efficient, you need less bandwidth to process info.
Read 12 tweets
5 Nov
Pst... my threads aren’t random.

A few people have told me they appreciate the randomness of my threads.

Some threads seem like they’re social justice-y.

Some threads seem like they’re about making money.

They’re actually all about labor, wealth, and inequality.
2/ Take my thread on Home Children. Canada used over 100,000 children as indentured slaves.

We’re told they were shipped to 🇨🇦 for a better life.

BS.

They were shipped because 🇨🇦 needed *cheap* labor.

Criminals were literally sent to do the same thing as punishment.
3/ It’s actually a thread on how the early European Canadians got a head start on the backs of others.

A similar lesson is found in my thread on HBC. They weren’t here to find homies, they were a company looking to pillage and plunder.
Read 8 tweets
4 Nov
Quick rant on knowledge shaming. 👨‍🏫

When I explain something, I explain it assuming the other person has ZERO knowledge.

It doesn’t matter if the person is a 14 year old, or a fund manager that summoned me to challenge an area he’s an expert in.

I just do. 1/5
2/ It’s easier for everyone to have important details repeated, than for them to figure out what they’re missing.

Not everyone has the same background.

This can be for any reason, from cultural upringing, to socioeconomic status, to a lack of prior interest.
3/ It doesn’t matter why they didn’t know the bit of info. It’s just important they know it now.

When you respond to a fact someone finds interesting with, “how could you not know that?”

... you *think* it makes you look smart. Really it just makes you a dick.
Read 6 tweets
4 Nov
Okay, do y'all know what "Home Children" are? 🙋‍♂️

I'm a 🇨🇦 history nerd, and literally had no idea what this was until this morning.

It turns out it's a weird and twisted part of history, 🇨🇦 plays an active role in hiding.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Basically if you were an orphan in the UK or commonwealth, you were rounded up and used as a slave.

This also happened to poor families that were tricked into giving up their kids "temporarily" into better care, only to come back and find out their kids were gone.
3/ Eventually there was too many kids, so they decided they would export them.

"Parents" in countries like Canada would go to homes, pay an "adoption fee," and get kids under indentured contracts.
Read 11 tweets
3 Nov
Who wants a quick thread on money laundering with cars? 🙋‍♂️

You might have noticed 🇨🇦 cities known for money laundering also have a large number of luxury vehicles.

Recently they discovered part of this has to do with the cars being used to launder.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ It's stupid easy. You buy a car with a bag of cash, then sell the car back to the dealership a year later.

Dealerships aren't equipped to determine how you got the money. They don't have the resources or training.
3/ You could be a dad who saved $100/week to buy the car of your dream, or a guy that just chopped someone up with a cleaver for $250k. They have no clue.

The money goes into the dealership's account, where it's processed as legit business, and you drive away with a super car.
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov
The difference between 🇨🇦 and the 🇺🇸 in terms of libel is something every Canadians should know.

In 🇺🇸, defendants are considered innocent until proven otherwise.

In 🇨🇦, the defendant is basically lying until proven otherwise.

Now this is *super* important.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ You're thinking, if you're going to say something, it should be true. Correct.

However, you need to be able to prove it in court *legally.*

Money disappeared, and the person in charge of it has the exact amount in their pocket? May not be enough evidence.
3/ This slants what issues get covered, and challenged in Canada. A media company, and some journalists, will not touch certain people and companies because they have deep pockets.

Yes, you will be reimbursed if you win. You still need to front the funds for defense.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!