I was lazily listening to the news and the US political debate and I cannot avoid myself to think how there is a sort of national "psychology" that shape the political discourse.
That is a sort of MAGA syndrome for Americans and a WAGAW one for Italians. I'll explain.
I doesn't matter the fact that Trump appropriated for himself the MAGA slogan, but the idea of Greatness, of being or having been or going back to be a Great Nation is a very American bipartisan obsession. And it's not only about foreign policy, the leader of the free world etc.
Take Biden's plan for railways: Given the current state of US passengers rail, he could content himself to call for a better/improved rail service. Instead, he calls for a "plan to ensure that America has the cleanest, safest, and fastest rail system in the world." No less.
The necessity and inevitability of Greatness is the curse of the American public discourse and always will be, probably. No politician will be able to win only on a platform of normalcy and just making America a functioning and fairer country among others.
And what about Italy? Well, I say Italy's distinctive feature is WAGAW or: "We are among the Greatest, are we?!?"You cannot understand the Italian public discourse and the way it acts in Europe and in the international context if you don't know what the idea of the "Italietta" is
It's the syndrome of the latecomer, the last to join the group of the "Great Powers" in the 19th century, the weakest, trying to project an image of Greatness (we are part of the club too!!) with what some people colled "beggar imperialism", imperialismo straccione.
There is a constant idea that the country need to be recognized by the grownups (the French, the Germans, the Brits, the Americans etc) its "place under the sun" and every sign of being not treated as equal is a profound attack on the national self-esteem
This is the idea of "Italietta", a minor country good only at operas and food, bad at war and at the other serious stuff reserved to the grownups. You cannot imagine how much this plays in the italian national psychology when a random Dutch start lecturing...
If you talk with a random person of my parents' generation, you can easily see them switching from complaining about the backwardness of the country to proudly remark that "we are still the 6th most industrialized nation" (no matter this is not true anymore since the 1990s)
So, every country has its own cursed self-representation of how it should naturally be: the US, with their anxieties of not being always and forever the best and the greatest, Italy with its enduring syndrome of the impostor among the "Great powers".
We don't need politicians, we need therapists.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was roaming around the excellent @yfreemark 's Transit Explorer 2 expansion to Europe and N-Africa and I started asking myself: is it correct to label TER as commuter rail? is even possible to have consistent categories across the Pond?
A distraction thread for transit twitter
First, I'm not even trying to figure out if LRTs are the same as modern French tramways or if a legacy tramway network like the one in Milan is more like a streetcar or an LRT, as some sections are more on the LRT side of the spectrum, with at grade but segregated RoW and long RS
My question is more about regional/commuter rail. I'm not even talking about the timetable pattern (all-day frequent vs peak only), but the extent of this definition as applied to Europe. Are French TER or Italian regional trains services like Metro-North, LIRR, NJT or MBTA?
1/ There is not much innovation coming from Italy, honestly. My home country is generally a laggard.
But the recent overhaul of mobility planning started with the creation of PUMSs is, I believe, an exciting example of how mobility planning should look like. A thread.
2/ PUMS (Piano Urbano della Mobilità Sostenibile) - Urban Plan for Sustainable Mobility, is the new planning tool introduced in the Italian legislation in the past decade. All the 14 major metropolitan areas + cities bigger of a certain threshold must draw one.
3/ PUMS per se are not an Italian invention, but the Italian application of a mid 2000s EU "white paper" about planning and mobility and how it can contribute in the effort to curb GHG emission and improve overall quality of urban life through a better mobility.
1/ A first look at the summary of the Regional Transit strategic plan for Montréal just published for consultation by the ARTM: repensonslamobilite.quebec/media/default/…
2/ Unfortunately the first impression is Business as Usual approach. Apart some good news re fare integration and widespread implementation of bus corridors at the metropolitan scale, the structuring choices are just a copy-paste of existing projects: REM, ligne Bleue, BRT Pie IX
3/ The rest is just "advancing-studies-for-further-corridors put-further-by-political-instances-in-recent-years". That is not what a strategic plan looks like, sorry. Strategic planning means making clear mode choices, especially in the context of a climatic crisis
There is a bit of an ON/OFF thinking about the destiny of CBDs in a Work-from-Home postpandemic world. Either fatalism for the inevitable death of the downtown office tower or the refusal to think that some white collars working patterns might change after that pandemic.
That said, rushing now onto predictions of how much the WfH movement will continue after the pandemic (and when will the "after-pandemic" come) is a bit premature, honestly. It's like predicting the future of German cities under WW2 bombings.
Anyway, I would be a little less concerned by CBDs that would better fall under the "city center" category, i.e. a more diversified place with regional destinations for shopping, leisure, higher education, etc.
Most European cities and also a number of Canadian and US cities are
Let's play a collaborative game. Let's imagine the 15-MINUTES-CITY-OF-TOMORROW, where a large amount of white collars work from home.
In this game, I'm of course one of those lucky WFH people. We always are.
I will add a couple of scenes to the scenario, but please add yours
🕗I finally got rid of the necessity to commute downtown and I can wake up at 8AM!🥳Even from home, I'm a busy person and I still order food from outside instead of eating at the Prêt-à-manger downtown. It comes from a nearby café, but not so close b/c zoning doesn't allow it
🕛the guy that brings me the lunch is nice, but he doesn't seem to be living in our "urban village"... By the way, how does he come here, since we scaled down transit? Did I tell you that we moved out since we both needed more space to WFH? We used to live in a 2 Bdr before
1/ After a recent exchange, here is a thread about the interconnectedness of global and local urban geographies of production and jobs and how they shapes mobility and planning with two Italian examples you never probably heard about : Mirandola and Porretta Terme
2/ The first example is Mirandola, a town of some 20k inhabitants is the flat lands, some 30km North of Modena. You'd probably know it better for being within the production area of both Parmigiano and the Balsamic Vinegar of Modena. But that somehow secondary.
3/The most important thing is that Mirandola is the main center of a cluster of biomedical manufacturing, accounting for more than 1 Bn of annual output, 70% exported, making it the world third largest after Minneapolis and Los Angeles. And that is a city of 20k that looks like⤵️