I think the government genuinely does not realise what a big mess it has already created with the Internal Market Bill, and how continuing is going to make it a lot worse. They actually believe the US and EU are wrong. theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
What ultimately happens with the Internal Market Bill is that either the government has to back down, in which case demonstrating weakness and poor judgement, or not, in which case no EU or US trade deal, and poor relations with both for the next four years.
As of today the UK government is on a crash course with reality, taking us all with it. Antagonism with all three trade superpowers, and no deals, lies before us unless the government now obviously u-turns. A government and country trapped by abysmal judgement and tactics.
Also, the UK throwing a hissy fit at the same time as an outgoing US President is attempting no turn his country into a dictatorship by the time honoured tradition of invalidating an election in which he lost isn't great timing. Rest of the world has more important issues...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In danger of being lost amid the news chatter today, a rather useful Which exercise on what consumers want from trade deals. They want trade, but they also want high levels of protection. which.co.uk/news/2020/11/w… (disclosure, I participated with a factual introduction of UK trade)
Where I part company with campaigners such as @nickdearden75 - I believe trade is good, but it has to be subject to the right rules. And that what has happened since the 1990s is not about the wrong rules, but a new globalization of global supply chains driven by technology
That clip taken from an article quite rightly pointing out that President Biden doesn't mean the end of the discussion on whether a US trade deal is good for the UK. US trade policy is fixed and unfortunately rather hostile to trade not done in the US way theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Sadly this is not correct. Said supermarkets and other major players, as well as UK government officials, were aware that EU checks on food would be required once they saw the text of the Northern Ireland protocol. This is down to that 'oven ready deal'
If you leave a single market, as Great Britain will be doing, then goods entering that market, which will include Northern Ireland, are subject to checks. Checks can be facilitated but not eliminated. This again has been known for some time.
What is needed more than anything else to facilitate trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a UK-EU trade deal. But the Northern Ireland protocol will still hold, and there will still be checks on goods both ways, whatever the UK government says otherwise.
In the event of a UK-EU deal it is possible both sides could put in place some kind of trusted scheme to reduce the problems of inspections of foodstuffs. Without one I see no possibility. This is the problem of unrealistic timescales (and who imposed those?).
The thread version of the story. Given that a representative of a major UK food manufacturer told me 9 months ago they would probably not supply Northern Ireland because of this issue, the UK government's failure to prepare is basic negligence.
As I have repeatedly said, the UK faces the largest one-day change in trading conditions in history on January 1st, deal or no-deal. @pmdfoster and @Joe_Mayes have written about the practical challenges endlessly. The government refused to extend that date. It has no excuses.
In which we move from a special relationship to "the UK and the US have much more in common than divides us". Can you imagine another PM saying this? All apparently related to a PM unable to make difficult decisions about the country's future.
Worth emphasising that given the UK starts from a tough place with President Biden, plenty of suspicion combined with shrugging as to whether we are worth engaging with, we need to try extra hard, not reinforce existing views.
If I'm in the Biden team right now I'm thinking Germany seems to be making an effort to build bridges, I know Ireland is going to be the special relationship for this President, and France is, well, France. What do I think about the UK? Sceptical at best.
Very important - the UK government has to say this because yesterday the PM gave exactly the opposte message and will have left the EU feeling that he will now cave to anything they suggest. In any case the deal is the deal, and he has to decide yes or no.
Meanwhile I think UK farmers will be very interested to learn that with regard to a potential US trade deal "the core elements are agreed" h/t playbook. US food standards being THE core element for the US yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Hmmm...
No getting away from the UK's decisions now. Never has it been more obvious that negotiations with the EU and US and really in both cases internal UK negotiations - between the government and their backbenchers, and government and a very large UK food standards lobby.
Although... always worth bearing in mind we don't know who exactly will hold which positions. But I don't see anyone on the Democrat side making the UK a priority.