Sadly this is not correct. Said supermarkets and other major players, as well as UK government officials, were aware that EU checks on food would be required once they saw the text of the Northern Ireland protocol. This is down to that 'oven ready deal'
If you leave a single market, as Great Britain will be doing, then goods entering that market, which will include Northern Ireland, are subject to checks. Checks can be facilitated but not eliminated. This again has been known for some time.
What is needed more than anything else to facilitate trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a UK-EU trade deal. But the Northern Ireland protocol will still hold, and there will still be checks on goods both ways, whatever the UK government says otherwise.
The DUP rightly pointed out back in October last year the threat from the Northern Ireland protocol to trade within the UK. Unfortunately this was ignored by the government. Blaming the EU a year later really is pretty desperate. Best try getting the UK government to a new deal.
Useful reminder of discussions about EU regulations applying to food in Northern Ireland nearly two years ago.
Incidentally disagree with this interpretation of the Commission response to the letter from the Northern Ireland First Minister and Deputy. By Commission standards it is pretty positive. Important we calibrate expectations correctly.
An important point about Northern Ireland food, which I feel deserves some factual background. 9 months ago approx I spoke with retailers who raised the issue of costs of supplying from GB. I know they said the same to the UK government.
The question has to be asked as to why the UK government appears to have made no effort to resolve the question of GB-Northern Ireland food supplies in 9 months. Such as offering to pay for the required checks. Ignorance or politics? I suspect the latter.
The EU is inflexible with third countries. Fact. The Northern Ireland protocol allows some scope, but it is not the EU's fault the UK government has refused to accept the consequences of what was signed.
It is understandable the Northern Ireland First Minister and Deputy ask for flexibility in food coming from GB. And that the EU cite the legal framework. But let us be clear that this is primarily about the UK government playing political games with Northern Ireland.
The Northern Ireland business community have been placed in an impossible position, and I have total sympathy for them. It is time the UK government accepted realities, and then, and only then, can we reasonably pressure the EU to show flexibility.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Henig

David Henig Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidHenigUK

12 Nov
Anguilla. Gibraltar. Falkland Islands. Forgotten problem territories of Brexit?

Comes to think of it, we hear rather more of Kent lorry parks than potential problems at Holyhead or Cairnryan.
Read 8 tweets
12 Nov
Have been thinking for some time about whether there will be a New Year 'reset' by the UK government, badly needed in economy, trade where plans and philosophy veer between listless and unrealistic, but would require more competent, less hostile and ideological key individuals.
Key problems include unbelievably bad government-business relationships (increasing likelihood of major supply chains leaving UK) and economic policy challenged by covid rebuilding and levelling up without obvious pathways beyond public spending and freeports.
It isn't easy to see what any government can do to stiumulate particular parts of their economy in an age of global and regional supply chains, but a particular challenge for a government committed to raising barriers to 50% of trade. Tough questions to answer.
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
Frankly I haven't heard of too many people in Westminster who think the central team around Johnson (Cain, Cummings etc) wouldn't be improved by substituting them for kindergarten attendees
Meanwhile in the real world the impacts of a poorly functioning government are starting to show
Read 6 tweets
11 Nov
Disingenuous in the extreme. The UK / Johnson has been vacillating on the deal that is there to be done since June. Nothing fundamental has changed since then. It won't change in the next week either. It just needs the UK to accept FTAs limit policy space.
Thought I'd draw a picture in case it still wasn't entirely clear to the UK what a Free Trade Agreement entails. It isn't @Usherwood class but it should do.

Now if they could kindly make a decision since UK business could actually use some certainty. Image
Only 600 pages?! What kind of baby trade agreement is this...
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
In danger of being lost amid the news chatter today, a rather useful Which exercise on what consumers want from trade deals. They want trade, but they also want high levels of protection. which.co.uk/news/2020/11/w… (disclosure, I participated with a factual introduction of UK trade)
Where I part company with campaigners such as @nickdearden75 - I believe trade is good, but it has to be subject to the right rules. And that what has happened since the 1990s is not about the wrong rules, but a new globalization of global supply chains driven by technology Image
That clip taken from an article quite rightly pointing out that President Biden doesn't mean the end of the discussion on whether a US trade deal is good for the UK. US trade policy is fixed and unfortunately rather hostile to trade not done in the US way theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 6 tweets
10 Nov
I think the government genuinely does not realise what a big mess it has already created with the Internal Market Bill, and how continuing is going to make it a lot worse. They actually believe the US and EU are wrong. theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
What ultimately happens with the Internal Market Bill is that either the government has to back down, in which case demonstrating weakness and poor judgement, or not, in which case no EU or US trade deal, and poor relations with both for the next four years.
As of today the UK government is on a crash course with reality, taking us all with it. Antagonism with all three trade superpowers, and no deals, lies before us unless the government now obviously u-turns. A government and country trapped by abysmal judgement and tactics.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!