At her confirmation, #AmyConeyBarrett said the #ACA SCOTUS case is about severability.
That assumes the individual mandate is unconstitutional, and the question before the court is: ๐พ๐๐ฃ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ค๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ผ๐พ๐ผ ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ก ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐?
The data shows it can... 1/9
2/ The individual mandate ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฑ been seen as essential to the ACAโs individual market. The thought ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฑ been, if people with #PreexistingConditons can get coverage, people would wait 'til they got sick to get insurance. This would drive up premiums and lead to a "death spiral"
3/ As anyone who has read the ACA knows, itโs a big piece of legislation. Thereโs a lot that has nothing to do with the individual mandate. Like calorie labeling, biosimilar approval, closing the Medicare donut hole. There was never a risk of a death spiral in Medicaid expansion.
4/ If the ACA needs the individual mandate anywhere, itโs the individual market. This is the market where people buy their own coverage and where the ACA newly required insurers to enroll people with #PreexistingConditions. So if there was going to be a death spiral, it'd be here
5/ In 2017, Republicans in Congress zeroed out the ACA's individual mandate penalty effective Jan 1 2019. There is still a mandate to buy insurance, but with a toothless $0 penalty.
For 2 going on 3 years, there's been no penalty AND no sign of a death spiral or market collapse
6/ Thereโs a lot of evidence showing thereโs no death spiral in the absence of a ACA mandate penalty:
โ๏ธInsurers are profitable even while holding premiums flat;
โ๏ธInsurers are newly entering or reentering the market; and,
โ๏ธOn average, enrollees donโt look any sicker.
7/ We have seen a drop in off-exchange enrollment โ the part of the individual market where people are generally too high-income to qualify for subsidies. But this enrollment decline predated the penalty being zeroed out, and it was steepest when premiums were rising pre-2019.
8/ So why havenโt we seen the death spiral so many experts expected?
The ACA's subsidies stabilize the market. It turns out most people ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ health insurance, itโs just a matter of whether they can afford it or not. The subsidy โcarrotโ is stronger than the mandate โstick.โ
9/ None of this may end up mattering to the Supreme Courtโs decision.
But if you want to know what the ๐๐๐ฉ๐ shows on severability, itโs that the ACA can work -- and has been working -- without a mandate penality.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Does Bidenโs presidential win make the ACA (#Obamacare) more likely to survive tomorrowโs Supreme Court case?
Only marginally, and it would all come down to Georgia.
Here's why: (1/7)
2/ The Trump Admin is arguing in court that the ACA should be struck down. A Biden Admin would change positions to defend the law.
But the Trump adminโs exit has no effect on the plaintiffs in the case โ 18 Republican-led states + two individuals โ who arenโt backing out
3/ Thereโs nothing administrative that Biden can do unilaterally as president to reverse the course of the ACA case. Biden canโt simply issue an executive order and make it go away. This case is now up to the largely conservative SCOTUS to decide.
NEW analysis: Rather than continuing to go without insurance, *4.2 million* uninsured people could get an #ACA bronze plan for FREE
We estimate 27% of uninsured potential Marketplace shoppers are eligible for a bronze plan with $0 premiums in 2019. kff.org/health-reform/โฆ
In #Delaware, #Iowa, #Nebraska, and #Utah, almost 1 in 2 currently uninsured people who could be buying Marketplace coverage will be able to get a $0 bronze plan in 2019.
But, will they even know this is an option?
Bronze plans have high deductibles & many ppl are better off w/ Silver
But the math is simple: $0 bronze >> uninsured
Bronze plans have $0 preventive services, often a few Dr visits pre-deductible, & make it more likely to get non-emergency care even if you can't pay deductible
[THREAD] The U.S. spends more $$$ than any other country on health care, but gets worse health outcomes than similar countries.
We live shorter lives and have more disease burden. And the gap between the U.S. and other countries has grown.
Along with Jeffrey Selberg @PetersonCHealth, my @KaiserFamFound colleagues and I took a deep dive into the health system. We examined the last 25 years of health spending and outcomes in the U.S. vs similar countries. We look at dozens of indicators from a variety of data sources
U.S. health outcomes have improved, generally, over the past generation. In the past 25 years, life expectancy in the U.S. improved 4% and disease burden improved 12% (though both recently worsened a bit). Meanwhile, the share of our economy devoted to health increased by 40%
NEW Analysis: Among people with employer coverage, nearly 1 in 5 inpatient admissions includes a claim from an out-of-network provider, putting them at risk for potentially high out-of-pocket costs. healthsystemtracker.org/brief/an-analyโฆ@PetersonCHealth
Even when enrollees choose in-network facilities, a meaningful share of inpatient admissions result in the patient receiving a claim from an out-of-network provider.
Emergency care is much more likely to include a claim from an out-of-network provider. This is true whether or not enrollees use in-network facilities.