Exactly. Zeroing the mandate did cause *some* damage to the indy market, but not nearly as much as feared. Just because the Obama Admin thought it was “vital” in 2012 (mostly to keep carriers from bailing in the early, shaky days) doesn’t mean it’s still “vital” today.
2019 premiums (the first year after the penalty was zeroed out) were indeed about $580/year higher specifically due to this reason than the would’ve been otherwise for unsubsidized enrollees...but that’s a fender bender, not a totaled car.

nytimes.com/2018/12/27/opi…
Average premiums went up less than 3% in 2019 (instead of *dropping* ~5% without the zeroing); 0% in 2020 (flat); and are going up just 1% in 2021.

That’s the very definition of a stable market.
I’ll also note that 5 states including California have their own mandate penalty now anyway, so from a market POV the mandate penalty is still around for 15% of the individual market.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Ghoul-ba

Charles Ghoul-ba Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charles_gaba

11 Nov
📣 Oh, yeah: #ACA Open Enrollment is happening NOW! Here's 7 important things to remember. acasignups.net/20/11/11/oh-ye…
1. DON'T MISS THE DEADLINE! In most states you have until December 15th to #GetCovered, but 10 states have a later deadline:
CA: Jan. 31
CO: Jan. 15
DC: Jan. 31
MA: Jan. 23
MN: Dec. 22
NV: Jan. 15
NJ: Jan. 31
NY: Jan. 31
PA: Jan. 15
RI: Jan. 23
2. MAKE SURE YOU ENROLL IN AN ACA-COMPLIANT PLAN! Use the official ACA exchange or an *authorized* 3rd-party site *which only sells ACA-compliant plans*!

CA: coveredca.com
CO: connectforhealthco.com
CT: accesshealthct.com/AHCT/LandingPa…
DC: dchealthlink.com
Read 14 tweets
11 Nov
...which is why the infighting between moderates and the far-left seems overstated. Aside from the “defund” wording hurting somewhat I’m not sure there’s as much “blame” to go around as many think.
The key to a big blue wave was to tie every GOP enabler to Trump. That...just didn’t happen, or at least it didn’t happen enough. Instead we got sort of a mixed bag. We gained 1-3 seats (tbd) in the Senate, lost perhaps 8-9 seats in the House (in red districts to begin with).
Here in Michigan we elected Biden, Gary Peters, flipped the state Supreme Court...but in the state legislature we gained two and lost two. Here in purple-trending-blue Oakland County, Dems won 5/6 county-wide races and 12/21 commission seats.
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
Sure, let’s take out three Democratic Senators and six Democratic House members when we might only have, at best, a bare majority in either chamber.
VT and MA both have GOP governors, and we remember what happened in the 2010 MA special election. Even in the House seats which are guaranteed to go blue, that’d still mean months with a vacancy which could mean a GOP majority in the meantime.
This is interesting, though: “John Podesta, the founder of the Center for American Progress who was an adviser to Mr. Obama on climate change.”

I thought CAP was HATED by the DSA types??
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
...which goes to show that using the PHRASE “defund” was terrible branding.
It’s not unreasonable for people to assume that “defund the police” means to take away ALL funding given that “defund” literally means to remove funding from something. You can argue that it doesn’t necessarily mean ALL funding, but that’s not an unreasonable interpretation. Image
This is similar to how polls show M4All having high approval ratings which drop significantly when you explain that “for all” wouldn’t be optional. Many people assume it means “for all who want it”.
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
Not to mention even if you support M4All, IT’S DEAD UNTIL AT LEAST 2024. Unless you think M4All supporters are going to pick up another 80 seats in the House AND flip all 30-odd GOP seats up in the Senate in the midterms, why the fuck are you picking this battle RIGHT NOW??
Biden will be VERY lucky to get us to ACA 1.5 before 2023, much less 2.0+a PO, and even THAT assumes we flip BOTH GA Senate seats AND the SCOTUS doesn’t strike the whole law down next spring.
Given the situation, killing the subsidy cliff, beefing up the subsidy formula, fixing the family glitch and something to entice more states into expanding Medicaid would be pretty fucking impressive in my view.
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov
CJ John Roberts now bringing up the fact that the Obama Admin argued that the mandate penalty was "critical" in 2012; why is it no longer "critical"...Verrilli (for the defense) makes exactly my point: The situation was very different in 2012 vs. 2020.

acasignups.net/20/10/13/colum…
Verrilli correctly notes that the carrot (financial subsidies) simply turned out to be far more important than the stick (mandate penalty).

Put another way: GOP cut off most of the red leg...which was then replaced by the World's Most Expensive Shim®. Image
Verrilli correctly notes that THE SITUATION CHANGED BETWEEN 2010 AND 2017.

In 2010, virtually every insurance carrier said they wouldn't participate in the ACA exchanges without a mandate. If that had happened, the law *would* have failed *at that time*. 2017 wasn't 2010.
Read 48 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!