How differently are we thinking about Trump compared to to how we would think about any other white rich person in America? Particularly a celebrity.
A white rich person can certainly obey all the laws and respect all the traditions of his or her community. There are lots of wealthy Americans who do — they’ve earned what they have (or inherited it, which is fair enough, that being the law now) & are perfectly lovely people.
But a white rich person doesn’t have to be. They can disregard laws & local customs if they want to, and pretty much be assured of getting away with it. The American legal system allows money to buy time; a white rich person caught cheating an employee or a contractor;...
....cheating on his taxes; using illegal drugs; forcing himself on a woman; or being generally abusive can generally buy himself out of legal consequences other Americans would face for such behavior. As for extra-legal consequences, money limits those as well.
These are the guiding principles of Trump’s entire life, not just his Presidency. And they apply to wealthy white Americans generally. The American public expects that they will, and would be sorely confused if they didn’t.
I’m thinking about this as a theoretical explanation for why acts of personal corruption, sex predation, or flagrant goofing off on the job — things that have ended many political careers — are accepted as normal for the outgoing President.
One might argue that Trump has unique status as a political demagogue such as the Founders feared or, as @jameshamblin does, that he uses the same psychological tools that sustained medical quacks a century ago (and still do). theatlantic.com/health/archive…
But perhaps it’s simpler than that. Perhaps the license given to Trump is just an exaggerated version of the license any white rich person in America expects, and is expected to get, in our society. Ability and virtue are imputed to such a person because of wealth....
....(and, in some cases, because of celebrity as well). The expectation of impunity goes with that. It’s not a healthy aspect of society I’m describing. But a phenomenon like Trump requires explanation; I’m just looking for the simplest one that makes sense. [end]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joseph Britt

Joseph Britt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Zathras3

13 Nov
Now that all states have been called, I wanted to record a few thoughts about the election while they're still fresh -- what seems to have been important, and what was evidently not. Follow along if interested.
I suppose it's only fair to disclose my priors, many of which were summed up in something I wrote just after the 2016 election. This characterized support for Trump by Republicans -- particularly the better-off among them -- largely as a moral failing.
The single most important dimension of this moral failing is rejection of responsibility -- which Trump certainly personifies, and which has been a recurring motif throughout his Presidency. His supporters, in this sense, got what they asked for in 2016.
Read 28 tweets
30 Oct
May I be so bold as to introduce a theological concept into the election campaign? This is A Sign From God. A candidate inviting you to a rally where you may contract a contagious disease after falling over from heatstroke is A Sign From God to vote for the other guy.
A candidate inviting you to a rally where you may contract a contagious disease and then stranding you in freezing weather miles from transportation is A Sign From God to vote for the other guy.
A candidate who tells you a pandemic growing rapidly across the country, every day -- cases, hospitalizations, deaths -- is actually ending is A Sign From God to vote for the other guy. God in His wisdom and somewhat mordant sense of humor is using the candidate for His purpose.
Read 13 tweets
28 Oct
Thread. I don’t do much commenting on polls, leaving that to experts like @NateSilver538 @LarrySabato & @WisVoter. A whole bunch of polls have dropped in the last 24 hours, mostly showing Biden with a solid lead. Some still hint at ways Trump could make this a close race.
But I wonder. If turnout nationally will be up as much as many seem to think (@TargetSmart, a Democratic polling firm, thinks about 16 million non-voters in 2016 have cast ballots already this year), is Trump likely to get most of them? It seems unlikely. Another thing....
Republican voters, warned off early mail voting by Trump & waiting until Election Day to cast ballots, have more time to absorb bad news — in particular about the pandemic Trump & his party continue to dismiss. For GOP candidates, bad news is coming at the worst possible time.
Read 5 tweets
27 Oct
Let's do a short thread about surrender, per this commentary by @DrLeanaWen. It's only the government that gets the option to surrender, of course, in a fight against #COVID19. The country has to live with it; people infected have to live with it. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Be that as it may, the Trump administration and the Republican Party have indeed chosen to surrender to the pandemic on behalf of the government. They will let public health experts keep their jobs, but will not let them drive a national strategy to suppress the virus.
Republicans will fill the airwaves with talk of vaccines and therapeutics, to the development of which they contribute nothing. They will remain inactive as the pandemic-stricken economy continues to contract, confronting millions of Americans with the prospect of destitution.
Read 20 tweets
14 Oct
I don’t have a lot to say about Judge Barrett, whose nomination under these circumstances I’d urge the Senate to reject if she were Brandeis reincarnated. But I did want to flag this @dino_grandoni coverage of her remarks yesterday about #ClimateChange washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
“I am not a scientist.” Eyeballs rolling skyward, for several reasons of which I’ll note just one. Judges are legal specialists, which is obviously necessary to a point. But it also means they can really screw things up when they choose to rule on substantive issues....
....about which they know little. I recall vividly, for example, years of confused litigation and EPA rulemaking produced when Judge Barrett’s idol Antonin Scalia decided regulations pursuant to the Clean Water Act directed at protecting habitat and water quality....
Read 10 tweets
4 Jun
Trump and Corruption: The corruption never stops in the Trump administration -- not for #COVID19, police killings or demonstrations to protest them. @JoshNBCNews sums up testimony given by purged State Department Inspector General IG Steve Linick....
....yesterday before House Foreign Affairs Committee, directly contradicting claims by Sec. Pompeo to have been unaware of investigations involving him and his wife making personal use of State Department resources. Committee statement (via @rgoodlaw): foreignaffairs.house.gov/2020/6/engel-m…
Trump and Corruption: The Pompeo investigation referenced above could be said to involve petty corruption. This report by @lydiadepillis @JustinElliott & @RobertFaturechi is about anything but that. Deputy Treasury Secretary's Justin Muzinich's.... propublica.org/article/this-t…
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!