We Hindus talk about Dharmayuddha and eventual victory. We say Pandavas suffered for 15 long years and ultimately prevailed. All is fine. But the fundamental issue is, had Bhishma and other elders took a stand when they were supposed to,
lakhs of deaths would have been avoided. Remember that lesson from Mahabharata. Bhishma's incompetence led to death of lakhs. Victory ultimately was with Dharma. But at what cost? Juxtapose this with today's situation.
Dharma will prevail. We have an option to avoid the mistake Bhishma did. Do we have the firmness to take a call? For me, the three most important lessons from Mahabharata? 1. Bhishma's indecisiveness 2. Duryodhana: Acting as if there is no war will not avoid war
3. In a Dharmayuddha, there is no neutral. Anyone who is not with you is with your enemy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me run through the NGT report on Diwali. I am still scratching my head to understand on what scientific grounds the decision is made. The reading I am getting here is, because winter has more pollution, let's ban Diwali. How is Diwali related to general winter pollution?
Page 33. One may want to ask how much of February's pollution is because of Diwali.
Banning crackers is one thing and bankrupting people is another. Who exactly benefits when traders who invest lakhs for selling crackers commit suicides, unable to pay back the debts they incurred in cracker sales? Looks this is beyond killing a festival.
First of all, banning crackers on Diwali is nothing more than quackery. There is not one study which says one day Diwali crackers will impact the lungs more than a year worth of vehicle pollution. On the other hand, we never saw such zeal in implementation of orders.
Had they banned it upfront, it's another thing. But this time, it's different. Orders came *after* the traders invested money in sales. What exactly is a person who took debt only to see that his whole investment becomes illegal overnight?
There is this little girl whose father was the official priest of a deposed king. She spent all childhood more as a boy than a girl - sword fight, horde riding and all those. One day, she was asked as a wife for a heirless old Brahmin king. She gave birth to a posthumous child.
When negotiations were going on over adoption of a heir, the king died and the British refused to accept the adoption. She petitioned but to no avail. The dead king had a strange habit. Weekly once he used to dress like a woman and gave public audience.
People thought he was eccentric. Somehow, someone asked him the reason why he did that. He replied simply, my power is nothing more than that of a woman in a house. This is just my symbolic protest of that. Now, this kingdom had a great reputation as a knowledge centre.
Letter One: @CMOTamilNadu
Letter Two: A Tamil Nadu Government officer.
Can anyone explain this dichotomy? Are we saying administration is rejecting the stand of the government or is the government sending mixed signals?
So, with Armenia, there is a problem - Orange Revolution. And Russia hates it. In two words, one can summarize it as, Russia lost the leverage on the talks table between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Forget all rhetoric. That's the fundamental problem.
Turkey always advocated for a resolution - you can't keep the pot simmering for ever!! That's exactly what Armenia did.
Was Azerbaijan correct? Legally, yes, but morally no. And after what it did to Armenian heritage in Nakchivan, a big no. hyperallergic.com/482353/a-regim…
There is a decent(for a British) exposition over caste - a rare good read on the topic. 1. Caste is not something unique to India. The sophistication of Indian society gives such a complex caste structure.
Don't believe a Literary Man.
And more importantly, don't believe a philologist. He will invent you stories out of thin air. The author aptly calls them Literary Fiend and Philological Crank.