I have felt compelled to write this thread for a while now, because most people have now heard of the “dialectic process” or the Hegelian Dialectic.
2) They recognize it as PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION, or as Hegel referred to them, Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, but there’s more to it than that. For many a deeper dive is necessary to truly understand how this all works
3) bcuz for the truth seeker it’s difficult to really understand what's going on today w/o understanding what the agenda of those who rule over us has been for over 100 years & how they have built the illusions that have allowed that agenda to advance with little to no resistance
4) This is a vitally important topic to understand for people who are seeking truth, because when we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see outside of the box.
5) Once we learn to step outside the dialectic, this releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought.
6) The dialectic process has a “kissing cousin”, that I frequently refer to as the false dichotomy (FD from this point forward). The FD is another set of levers used to push us into the dialectic process or Hegelian Dialectic (HD from this point forward).
7) These 2 cousins work together to weave elaborate webs of deception.
The dictionary definition of an FD is along the lines of: 'A situation in which two alternative points of views are presented as the only options, whereas others are available'
8) My usage of the term goes beyond this.
First of all:
the psy-op warrior might create a situation that is a “tri” or “quad” (chotomy)where there’s 2 or 3 or even more seemingly ludicrous alternatives, thereby; driving what appears to be only a singular rationale solution,
9) and that singular, apparently rationale solution is actually the “trap”.
10) Also, the FD can be used simply to create a false impression, by using a deliberate hypocrisy.
11) One example I like to use is the Catholic Church’s official policy that no priests can be Freemasons, but a thorough look at the church hierarchy reveals that most of the high ranking, members are in fact Freemasons.
12) I also refer to this as an FD, although it doesn’t fit the dictionary description. (if you have a better term for this type of deception please feel free to enlighten me in the comments at the end of the thread)
13) Another example I use is the GoP’s platform. Part of it is small limited government and fiscal conservatism, which it obviously NEVER supports. I refer to this as a false dichotomy as well
14) So, an FD is also a false statement deliberately made in conflict of reality, that is used to deceive people.
15) Another great example would be a government that is always banging the drum of “law & order” publicly, while that institution is completely lawless, completely bereft of justice.
16) I have on multiple occasions listened to people tell me that they understood the dialectic process, only then to proclaim a statement that was itself an FD.
17) The 3rd usage (closest to the dictionary definition) of the term is how it was used in early 20th century Europe. A situation where you’re basically given 2 (or more) bad choices and each are a trap.
18) In early 20th century Europe the false dichotomy trap was a choice between communism & fascism. Both choices were traps. Republicans and Democrats do the same thing on a smaller scale on the regular.
19) You want free enterprise capitalism. The Democrats offer you socialism and Republicans offer you corporatism and call it capitalism
20) These FDs can be used to set us up for the HD or as a component of the HD process
The HD is the framework (Problem, Reaction, Solution) for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution.
21) If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, and how we're forced into the box by FDs then we do not know how we are helping to implement the NWO agenda.
22) Literally EVERY societal, economic or foreign policy problem or crisis that faces us, is intentionally created to push us into the HD framework.
23) When Plato said: “when a tyrant rises, he appears as a protector” he was articulating a simplification of the fact that it requires a crisis(problem), to invoke fear(reaction) for a tyrant to have the opportunity(solution) to save the people.
24) It took Hegel in the 19th century to define this process, but it’s as old as Satan himself.
25) The HD requires an antagonist and a protagonist to work.
The synthetic Hegelian solution to conflicts can't be introduced unless there are two sides that will work in opposition to advance the agenda.
26) This is created artificially through ‘controlled opposition’.
27) The role of the controlled opposition is to use a false dichotomy(s), to paint a picture that they stand for something that they do not, so that later on they can present the illusion of surrendering or losing (which was the plan the whole time)
28) to a better or more popular approach or idea(which is most often another falsehood).
Now think of how conservatives are always calling Republican politicians “spineless”.
29) This is their intentionally preconceived, supplanted alibi. They’re not spineless they are just playing their role of controlled opposition and being called “spineless” is proof that their deception is working.
30) Once a new solution of "synthesis" is presented, the new “solution” or synthesis in turn creates a new problem or thesis.
31) We have seen this 1000 times in US politics and foreign policy. All of the problems facing America today are the result of previously offered solutions, or synthesis’.
32) The deception continues in America, because people buy into the Republican vs Democrat false dichotomy(lever) that pushes them into the Hegelian Dialectic process.
33) Every politician plays his/her role like an actor in a movie and American’s continue to chose the “lessor of two evils”, because they don’t understand the ‘art of deception’ #WakeUp
34) Once people chose to understand these concepts, they will reflexively step outside of "the box" and spot the deception coming around the corner
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Thread entitled: Cultural Marxism the plot to destroy America from within.
This thread is a rewrite of one that I penned, on Cultural Marxism, on my old account before it was suspended, right after the announcement that the Boyscouts of America was going "trans".
2) Today, our young people are taught in government classrooms that national independence & individual liberty are old fashioned ideals, quaint & in many cases just plain wrong;
3) that individualism and patriotism amounts to racism; that property ownership is selfish & a social injustice; that our free society was the root of the Earth's destruction and that it must be dismantled through a tightly controlled, organized global village.
1) On this Veteran's Day(it still is where I am) as a vet, I feel compelled to write the following:
If you're not a an objective thinker or if you're a Statist you probably don't want to read further as it will piss you off.
I promise harsh truths and will deliver...
2) as an Army vet I realize that I did NOT serve my country, I did NOT fight for freedom or the defense of "democracy.
I did serve the Rothschild/Rockefeller NWO military industrial, pharmaceutical, banking & energy complex.
For this reason it fills EXTREMELY uncomfortable...
3) when you say "thank you for your service".
I did not "serve" you. I did not even "serve" my country.
At the time I thought I was, but my misconception at that time doesn't change the reality that I was a pawn serving a diabolical agenda. As Henry Kissinger once said:
People from either side of the aisle who don’t really understand Trump, likely don’t understand Reagan. So, I’m going to go back and use examples from Reagan's career to illustrate my revelations about Trump.
2) Conservatives in print & on the Internet talk about Reagan's dedication to individual liberty & smaller government & about his single-handed whooping of the Soviet Union.
3) TV journalists, having no interest in smaller government, focused more on his fighting of the Cold War & playing their usual role of controlled opposition by criticizing him for all the things, (like reducing the size of gov’t and cutting taxes) conservatives applauded him for
2) When George H.W. Bush signed the Rio Accords at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, he paved the way for the United Nations to begin implementation of U.N. Agenda 21 in the United States
3) A year later, Bill Clinton created the President's Council for Sustainable Development by Executive Order, which laid the foundation for agents of the United Nations to begin radically altering the social and political structure of the United States
1) The following is a breakdown or an index on the USMCA (New NAFTA)
Please retweet if you don't want to see the US in an EU style North American Union:
2) Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, Environmental Cooperation Agreement (ECA), Chapter 24, on pages: 24-22, 24-26