(0) This will be a thread about $DHT, what I deem the prime brokerage /custodian / managerial platform on top of $SNX. While you are at it, if you think you got the chops, make sure to apply to the $500k seed investment to kickstart your fund:
(1) $DHT’s core function very similar to a combo of SS&C, Millennium pod platform, StanChar custodian, and JPM Prime Broker. All the back-end & admin details taken care of, so all a manager needs to do is to generate returns (algo or discretionary)
(2) For any aspiring traders, value-prop is simple – if one has so much alpha, why not leverage that know-how and earn some carry? Those that can, do; those who can’t would just larp / shitpost on youtube / twitter while selling newsletters (you know who you are).
(3) Fee structure / value-accrual eventually will be simple. X% commission, Y% performance fee, and 10% $DHT Platform cut. So if a manager makes 100 bucks on 200 bucks of asset, the fee pool is roughly (200+100)*x + 100*y, whereby manager gets 90% / DHT gets 10%
(4) Future additional complexity can be added to address high-watermarks (only accrue performance fee when performance above previous peak), lock-up tiers coupled w/ various fee structures, etc. There is one thing missing though –
(5) I think the @DhedgeOrg team should seriously consider prioritizing a cap-intro function, whereby manager can allow outside parties get a cut of the fees via referral links (if referred invest in fund, the referee of fund gets a cut of carry through duration of investment).
(6) Thanks to the instant liquidity provided by $SNX (and high fees + asset pool constraints), $DHT is most well-suited for discretionary, somewhat lower-frequency, directional degen traders who sling majors, or low-frequency algos.
(7) What’s really exciting is that as layer-2 + leveraged futures (and more derivatives / instruments) eventually come to $SNX, $DHT will naturally be the 1st beneficiary. $SNX should benefit w/ more fees from $DHT as well.
(8) At the meantime, this segment should embody somewhat low competition – The $YFI continue to focus on on-chain, algorithmic plays while @SetProtocol of the world go for rule-based baskets. Their world could eventually merge so best to place bets all across.
(9) There’s still a ton of work to be done on the $DHT side – UI/UX still needs a ton of work (compare $DHT’s v1 interface vs. the blue-chips, it’s below-average), the dormant collateral in $DHT should be yield-seeking, token economics still a WIP, etc
(10) …and the platform constraint at some point could flare up (SNX debt size limiting size of DHT AUM, trading fees + gas fee still too high, everything regulation related to running a fund and marketing, asset pool may never reach small-caps, etc)
(11) … but it doesn’t take away the fact that barrier of entry for anyone to monetize on one’s alpha (if one ever possesses any) had come down significantly to almost non-existent levels. If you consider yourself really good, you’d make way more here vs. selling newsletters.
(12) As for the token itself, valuation is straight forward re: AUC * blended manager take rate * 10%. To stay true to HF platform spirits, I could really see DHedge managers getting free / discounted access to data vendors (@glassnode, @skewdotcom, etc) as well as..
(13) …research platforms like @Delphi_Digital , @MessariCrypto, @RealVision, etc). Firms like Citadel and Millennium cut sweet deals w/ vendors and PMs have all the toys / tools in the world as well as entire back-offices to do their data-analysis / factor-analysis biddings.
(14) Risk of course includes whether the platform can scale, ban hammer from regulators, $SNX native platform risk (one do wonder what if a few managers are really good, $SNX stakers get hosed), etc. But then again ~45 mm USD FDV is really not a lot. Good luck to the team!
(15) Other features include but are not limited to free / paid-for content native on $DHT by managers (updates, trade ideas, live Q&A, etc), data analytics bundled and charged for a fee ("what are the smart guys doing?"), bidding / better sorting or filter for managers, etc.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maple Leaf Capital

Maple Leaf Capital Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MapleLeafCap

1 Nov
(0) While the progress of L2 is on-going, I think another area within #DeFi is highly interesting today and remains slightly underexplored by buidlers and speculators / investors alike – tools & modularization add-ons ($GRT, $Gauntlet, $KP3R, $GYSR)
(1) In this thread I will give 2 types of directions I see today – (a) B2B type buidler tools like $GRT and $Gauntlet, and (b) process-streamlining / modularization tools like $GYSR and $KP3R. This is not endorsement by any sorts but merely highlighting what’s cool out there.
(2) B2B tools by definition service the buidler community to help them buidl better – and there are 2 areas one can find particularly visible that’s almost blockchain / web3 native: one is faster retrieval of standardized on-chain data, and other being simulation of all sorts.
Read 26 tweets
24 Oct
(0) I’ve been quiet for a while but that’s because the Web3 space today is in serious #buidl mode and I don’t have much to say. Some preliminary thoughts on gov, #DeFi, and CBDC after the past 2-3 months; as usual if I have more time, it’d be more coherent and shorter.
(1) Only users that contribute to network effect of protocol deserves to be rewarded. The pure value provided by a good service (for non-network-effect biz) is good enough for most users, giving them more value-capture is dilutive to protocol value. Most users don’t deserve shit.
(2) Control is needed to retain flexibility in times of shock / need for intervention. #DeFi apps before maturity are not L1/L2 where decentralization is foundational feature. To quote Bo @ Dragonfly, Web2 apps are trains where adjustments to carts & passengers are constant…
Read 12 tweets
17 Sep
Hot $UNI takes
- Initial reaction is dump $UNI into your favorite token across (long best DEFI coins)
- 2nd reaction is long ETH as alts take-profit + buy to farm $UNI.
- 3rd reaction is ETH based farms likely higher yield given ETH goes to $UNI pool (percent & pickle to name 2)
- 4th reaction WBTC getting love w/ $UNI pool = BTC onchain up = accelerated pull from exchange to ETH, bullish $BTC
- 5th reaction new projs launching could weak book build (like $DHT) but could moon post listing w/ profits from factors above.
- 6th reaction is arbs will be everywhere ($AAVE migration, basis trades, etc) due to fund capital constraints. Free money for those w/ capital
- 7th reaction is gas fee is gonna moon, long L2 tokens + gas token as derivative play. Spare stablecoins will get ridic borrow fees
Read 5 tweets
22 Aug
0 - As popularly requested, this will be a thread about $NXM. The token design of $NXM is one of the most elegant I have seen yet. Enough good work had been done by @krugman25, @Darrenlautf, @BatmanDeFi on bonding curves and core mechanics so I won’t repeat here.
1 - $NXM = equity tranche of an Insurance group; despite the “mutual” tag, given buyers of insurance doesn’t need to own $NXM today, feels more like a typical insurance biz. At capital pool of 160-165k ETH and mkt cap of ~900-950k ETH, $NXM InsureCo trades at 5.5-6.0x PB.
2 - 1st thing most need to realize is that $NXM is in persistent ICO / capital raise mode unless (market cap – 3 mm * px) / capital pool <1 (i.e. not raising money when this InsureCo trades below book), which is also coincidentally when MCR % < 100%.
Read 32 tweets
8 Aug
0 - As per popularly requested & at risk of repetition, here is my framework on $YFI. A lot of good work done by @DefiGod1, @im_manderson, and @learn2yearn already. I will try on a higher-level flesh out what all the hype is all about. If I have higher IQ, it'd be shorter.
1 – At its very core, @AndreCronjeTech built a platform to pool capital (such that fixed cost / tx minimized & rotational speed to highest return opp. maximized) and automatically allocate into protocols to maximize delta-neutral (i.e. non-directional) profits
2 – whatever such yield / profit is higher than outright lending to likes of COMP / AAVE, the premium fundamentally comes from (a) speculative capital supporting token inflation emission on various protocols and (b) speculative capital levering up to chase more gains
Read 30 tweets
1 Aug
0 – As per popularly requested, here’s my preliminary thoughts on the $LEND / $AAVE 2.0 tokeneconomics restructuring, with the #’s based on @The3D_ ‘s proposal at governance.aave.com/t/initial-disc…
1 – In the new token model, $AAVE effectively becomes the “equity tranche” of a co-operative bank, enjoying net interest margin of balance sheet & any add’l fees + taking 1st loss upon default, whereby depositors / capital-providers get to enjoy part of the $AAVE equity issuance.
2 – In this framework, assuming 50% of $AAVE is staked (6.5 mm), then this “bank’s initial book value tops ~200 mm USD, with today ~500 mm as deposits on liability side of the balance sheet + ~100 mm on the asset side as “yield-generating”: aavewatch.now.sh
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!