Glenn Greenwald desperately needs an editor. Do you really need three successive paragraphs making the exact same point?
Was the media ready to collapse before Trump? Did he rescue news outlets?

I wouldn't know from this paragraph just assuming that fact because it provides no numbers, just hyperlinks to a couple of anecdotes. Image
This is what makes Greenwald so unpleasant to read. His writing is bloated with adjectives and rail-thin for facts. Doesn't it get boring just namecalling? Image
And the thing is, Glenn Greenwald was a huge Iraq War supporter, as he noted in his book. So it's a little rich for him to come back down and claim there's no recovery. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ASFleischman

16 Nov
A Trump lawsuit in three parts:

1. We PROMISE we will find evidence

2. Where is the evidence?

3. Ok we're dismissing

||democracydocket.com/cases/ga-democ… ImageImageImage
The above tweet was about Georgia, but it's happening all over.

Here is again out of PA, with identical language:

democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…

1. We promise to find evidence.
2. We're dismissing because there's no evidence ImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
14 Nov
This is Lin Wood's lawsuit as a Presidential tweet.

Here's the thing, the consent decree required 2 people to find a signature mismatch and to provide a chance to cure. That is not "impossible." And the decree was in March.

You waited until 8 months later to bring it up?
Here' the text of the order, pulled from Wood's lawsuit. Image
Notably, the signature requirement from the statute is still in effect. It is just that the Secretary of State agreed to a method of determining whether a signature matches, in this case, comparing against other records and requiring three people to check. Image
Read 5 tweets
13 Nov
A Michigan judge has denied the Trump campaign's motion to cease certification of the vote in Detroit, noting that if the election challengers had attended orientation, they would know that what they were witnessing was routine.

assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7328…
The food van lady was not found credible.
A claim that workers were instructed not to ask for ID was made less credible because the affiant failed to, y'know, say when or where it happened, or how many times.
Read 12 tweets
13 Nov
Justice Alito once dissented from an opinion holding that officers were not authorized to strip search a ten-year-old girl who was not named in the search warrant.

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?c…
The officers claimed that they were authorized to search the child because they had asked for permission to search "all occupants." But the judge only authorized them to search the male resident in the warrant he signed.
Alito, then a judge on the Third Circuit, would have held that although the warrant did not name either female occupant, it was intended to, and there was probable cause to strip search them.
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
Gavin McInnes is currently suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for describing the Proud Boys as a "hate group," claiming that they're mostly known for handing out Christmas presents.

rawstory.com/2020/11/civil-…
The Proud Boys don't "allow" white supremacists into the organization, the law suit claims.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Image
There have been no filings in this case for almost a full year, despite some excellent lawyering from the SPLC. The case was reassigned to a new judge on that date, pictured below: Image
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov
Voter fraud conspiracy enthusiasts are engaging in what you might call a Gish Gallop, throwing tons of arguments against the wall to see what sticks, to make it exhausting an distracting to debunk.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gall…. Image
Gish gallops are difficult to handle, because it is actually very easy to make something up, and very difficult to bear down, investigate, and show why the lie is not true.

For instance, I could say, right now, that Ivanka Trump voted illegally in Pennsylvania.
That took me no effort at all to say. Now, to prove me wrong, you go through voter registration and you say "AHA, she's not registered."

And then I say, "She didn't use her real name."

Now, even more work to debunk. You've got to track her travel, or show fraud impossible.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!