THIS will be recorded in history:
In 2020:
👉@WHO does not listen to science
👉WHO rejects aerosol transmission EVIDENCE
👉WHO downplays the role of ventilation
👉WHO neither explains WHY ventilation is needed
👉WHO doesn't retract, neither move
1/
In 2020:
👉@WHO does not listen to science
👉WHO rejects aerosol transmission EVIDENCE
👉WHO downplays the role of ventilation
👉WHO neither explains WHY ventilation is needed
👉WHO doesn't retract, neither move
1/
February 7, 2020
Donald Trump knew: "it goes through air, Bob"
But for 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 reason (politics, economy, not interest at all in public health, all together, who knows...) he didn't mention this in public
2/
Donald Trump knew: "it goes through air, Bob"
But for 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 reason (politics, economy, not interest at all in public health, all together, who knows...) he didn't mention this in public
2/
February 13, 2020
Wow, so @WHO also knew that COVID goes through air, @DrTedros said: "COVID is Airborne"
3/
Wow, so @WHO also knew that COVID goes through air, @DrTedros said: "COVID is Airborne"
3/
March 28, 2020
Well, 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 happened inside @WHO and they make this announcement: "FACT: COVID is not airborne". Even worst: they call it "misinformation". This is unethical and against public health.
4/
Well, 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 happened inside @WHO and they make this announcement: "FACT: COVID is not airborne". Even worst: they call it "misinformation". This is unethical and against public health.
4/
April 10, 2020
"Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality"
This letter was a first desperate call of science, followed by many many many others open letters, articles, papers, EVIDENCE, etc.
5/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32294574/
"Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality"
This letter was a first desperate call of science, followed by many many many others open letters, articles, papers, EVIDENCE, etc.
5/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32294574/
July 4, 2020
"239 Experts With One Big Claim: The Coronavirus Is Airborne"
The @WHO has resisted mounting evidence that viral particles floating indoors are infectious
6/
nytimes.com/2020/07/04/hea…
"239 Experts With One Big Claim: The Coronavirus Is Airborne"
The @WHO has resisted mounting evidence that viral particles floating indoors are infectious
6/
nytimes.com/2020/07/04/hea…
September 21, 2020
It seems @WHO is getting nervous about aerosol transmission question.
By the way @DrMikeRyan, "the exact nature of the change" is also not clear between 13 February and 28 March statements done by WHO
7/
It seems @WHO is getting nervous about aerosol transmission question.
By the way @DrMikeRyan, "the exact nature of the change" is also not clear between 13 February and 28 March statements done by WHO
7/
October 16, 2020
"There is an urgent need to harmonize discussions about modes of virus transmission across disciplines to ensure the most effective control strategies and provide clear and consistent guidance to the public."
8/
science.sciencemag.org/content/370/65…
"There is an urgent need to harmonize discussions about modes of virus transmission across disciplines to ensure the most effective control strategies and provide clear and consistent guidance to the public."
8/
science.sciencemag.org/content/370/65…
November 2020, and on going
Citizens petition calling on the WHO to act and urgently promote broad awareness of aerosol transmission. With many HCWs in the petitioners. Also ignore by @WHO
covidisairborne.org
#COVIDisAirborne
@covidisairborne
9/
Citizens petition calling on the WHO to act and urgently promote broad awareness of aerosol transmission. With many HCWs in the petitioners. Also ignore by @WHO
covidisairborne.org
#COVIDisAirborne
@covidisairborne
9/
Fauci here makes much more than recognise aerosol transmission, he also showed that his concern for science and public health is above any political interest, as only the biggest do
10/10
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
