Analysis of QAnon by a game designer. Everyone should read! medium.com/curiouserinsti…
QAnon method is like the movie Inception on a mass scale. Planting seeds of misinformation so that its victims generate their understanding of alternative reality for themselves.
The author concludes that this isn't a movement that grew organically, but rather one that is orchestrated with big money.
Many in the real world place too much faith in their opponents also participating in the same shared reality. Unfortunately, what happens when if their opponents live in a fictional alternative reality?
History is full of conflicts as a consequence of clashing world views. Historically these world views were created by religions. That is a narrative primarily based on fiction.
It is alternative fictional narratives that have no reference to reality that leads to massive human suffering. What do the Armenian, Cambodian and Nazi genocides have in common? A fictional narrative with a final solution.
Humans have always been storytellers. Religion has always been that kind of collective storytelling that creates a virtual reality in our world. It is what gives us meaning in this world.
But meaning-making has can be defined in a way that is simple and non-mysterious. Collectives thus are able to generate the games required to keep its believers in active participation. It is in participation that we derive meaning.
The stories that have endured are stories that require participation by its listeners. The purpose of stories by Australian aborigines was for travelers to navigate their way in the outback. This eventually morphed into a unique kind of mysticism.
Stories thus that involve participation become incorporated into our very being. The Japanese Ikigai (reason for being) in fact hinges on the interplay of belief and participation.
Humans find meaning when they participate. Participation leads to the discovery of patterns. Pattern discovery leads to the feel of understanding. Understanding leads to the feel of wholeness.
None of these feelings needs to be driven by deference to reality. They only need to be orchestrated by a good game designer.
Perhaps we should not be just story makers, but rather game designers.
The power of artists, specifically musicians is that they capture our minds through our participation. Bach popularity was a consequence that his melodies were sung in church. This primed the population to begin to resonate with his kind of music.
Traditionally, we've treated mediums as static things that are consumed passively. But what do we make of mediums like games where there is constant repetitive immersion? What do we make of media that creates entire universes (i.e. Marvel MCU, Star Wars etc)
Humans will continue to seek meaning in alternative realities that can be framed in a game. In fact, many consume their entire lives participating in a game known as sports. We find meaning by playing or being a fan of a game.
The future of all human enterprise is in the creation of alternative realities that encourage participation and immersion. It is gross incompetence by studios that seek creativity in favor of preserving 'canon'.
Good alternative realities still require a level of consistency and coherence. There must be some deference to logic that allows a fan to suspend or maintain a consistent set of beliefs.
All too often we see studios kill the golden goose by insisting on story arcs that destroy the story's original consistency. As a consequence closing off an evolutionary pathway to a much larger universe of stories.
Lucas Film story group is responsible for the consistency of all Star Wars stories. Although it is all fiction, there is value in maintaining consistency across many stories. Marvel MCU has executed this strategy to great effect.
The next evolution of games is to make participation a means of livelihood. We see this already in cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and its cousins create different narratives to draw participation or investment. It is a game that is played that is worth half a trillion dollars.
But not everyone derives meaning from making money. Fantasy sports and sports betting perhaps has a sweeter spot in the interplay of meaning making and making money. Also let's not forget the financial markets, also a game that is becoming more divorced from reality.
If everything is just a game, then where can we find meaning that transcends all of these simulated realities? We can find it in the game of discovering reality.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

17 Nov
Excellent paper from Google discussing the robustness of Deep Learning models when deployed in real domains. arxiv.org/abs/2011.03395
The issue is described as 'underspecification'. The analogy they make is linear equations with more unknowns than the number of equations. The excess freedom leads to differing behavior across networks trained on the same dataset.
This is one of the rare papers that has practical significance to the production deployment of deep learning. I've alluded to this problem previously with respect to physical simulations. medium.com/intuitionmachi…
Read 11 tweets
16 Nov
What is the difference between causation and causality? The former is a consequence of a generative model and the latter is a consequence of a descriptive model.
Causation is the emergent partial ordering induced by computation. Theoretical, all the characteristics of computation such as universality and the halting problem are inherited by the concept of causation.
Causality however is a different thing. It is a process that approximates the causal behavior of complex processes. Approximates in the sense that it describes the process. This is different from simulating the process which has its own intrinsic limitations (Church-Turing).
Read 16 tweets
14 Nov
Jay McClelland on What's missing in Deep Learning crowdcast.io/e/learningsalo…
He argues against innate systematic generalization in humans and it is something that we acquire.
Thus he argues that to achieve systematic generalization we need to devise machines that learn how to do systematic generalization. That is, a meta-solution to the problem.
Read 21 tweets
14 Nov
Yesterday's Learning Salon with Gary Marcus. The last 30 minutes were excellent (after the guest left). The best conclusion: @blamlab AI is the subversive idea that cognitive psychology can be formalized.
crowdcast.io/e/learningsalo…
Important to realize that a description of a missing cognitive functionality does not have enough precision or leave enough hints on how this is implemented in the brain. Implementations in code do not imply how it is implemented in the brain.
Another distinction that is important that there is a disagreement on how to do research. The Deep Learning community has argued that we should not constrain ourselves with a-priori hypothesis that may be wrong. Let the learning system discover the algorithms.
Read 6 tweets
13 Nov
The more try to understand cognition, the more you realize how long the journey may be required to get human-like general intelligence.
Our frameworks of understanding cognition are getting better. However, one has to understand that cognition arises through emergence in complex adaptive systems. These systems are very difficult to set up and replicate.
To get an intuition of how large the gap truly is, one only needs to observe how awkward and non-organic in our present-day robots. Why can't they perform with the nimbleness of honey bees?
Read 5 tweets
13 Nov
The idealization of the ethnic peasantry as the one true national class is the generating condition that lead to genocides in Nazi Germany, Armenia, and Cambodia. It is fueled by the resentment of the elite as the root of their own misery.
We need to learn from history and ask why a country like Cambodia will put a quarter of its population to death only because they were experts in different crafts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian…
What collectively drives people to kill people on a mass scale? What makes people ignore their natural empathy for others? It is the collective delusion that the existence of another is the reason for one's misery.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!