My 8th grade daughter (Uma) is writing an essay on the US Constitution for school. Her chosen topic is Federalist 10. Madison's warning about parties (below) is appropriate for our current times.
My daughter's concern is that it seems Madison's solution to factions, giving power to the Union (over the states), doesn't really stop parties and party loyalty.
But she agrees with Madison below: factions at the state level can harm a state, but not multiple states. Her solution (she is naive enough to think it is her solution) is more federalism.
THREAD: I've been thinking about what causes the waves of COVID we've been seeing. A common explanation is weather or seasons. Eg, cold weather pushes ppl indoors in close contact. I want to explore another (economic) one: delayed reporting & prevalence response elasticity. 1/24
TLDR: A possible economic explanation for COVID waves, esp hi frequency or quick waves, is a/ delayed info about cases & b/ collective action problems. This explanation is not mutually exclusive w the seasonal explanation. @toxvaerd1@tylercowen@ATabarrok@arpitrage@nebuer42 2/
It has implications. For science, policy: Plot longer run (months-long) moving averages to see what's happening w COVID. This may affect parameter estimation for epi models. For econ research: take seriously policy endogeneity if using time series to estimate effect of policy. 3/
where CI is confidence. But economically this is telling you the cost you must incur (N) for a given level of quality (inputs into f, including MDE).
That has economic value, but is not really how studies are done or items are purchased. Consumers don't say, I have to have a car of this quality, just tell me what to spend. They see a vector of (quality, price) pairs & choose pair that maximizes U s.t. their budget constraint.
I want to highlight this MR post by @ATabarrok. It has AFAIK a novel approach to trials that warrants serious discussion: release a drug & randomize access via lottery. Then compare outcome across ppl that won lottery and those who lost. Like the Oregon Health Ins Experiment.
If we do this, we may want to subsidize the price, so that demand for the lottery is high. This may also address ethical issues.
But there are some important issues with this approach. Not all insurmountable. Here is a first cut.
1/Selection. Ppl who are randomized to no access will get other treatment. Some will take nothing, others will take another conventional treatment if available.
But this is a problem with existing trials. I noted an old article on selection into RCTs.
TLDR: The value of a vaccine, & thus your distribution priorities, depends on the counterfactual. If CF is no/delayed vaccine & *suppression* (eg lockdown), main benefit of vaccine is economic activity. If CF is no/delayed vaccine & *no suppression*, main benefit is health. 2/20
In the former CF, you prioritize the most productive people. In the latter CF, you would prioritize people at greatest risk of health harm from COVID. 3/20
CAN YOU HELP SLUMS WITH HANDWASHING?
This is an urgent request form NGOs working to stop COVID in Indian slums. Details of problem in THREAD. Summary: we need solution that slums can implement themselves w/ reused water. Please retweet to increase eyeballs. 1/ @vandanagoyal01
Handwashing requires water & soap. Both are in short supply in slums cuz they usually don't have water pipes. Govt sometimes sent water tankers, but those have slowed. 2/ @adamschilton@tariqthachil@adam_m_auerbach
We can't create new handwashing stations. This takes time to scale w/o a lockdown. With India's 21 day lockdown, definitely cannot ship them there. Plus, they require water. 3/ @pritika13@nebuer42