2/ The legislative branch established rules for the election which were blatantly ignored. Yes, the courts can address, but the legislative branch has both the power and the responsibility to address.
3/ And there are serious allegations of fraud with evidence to back it up. Again, the legislative branch established the rules for voting to prevent fraud and should own the investigation into the fraud.
4/ To be clear: I am not suggesting the legislative branch overturn the popular vote; I am demanding the legislative branch determine the tally IS THE POPULAR VOTE and based on its conclusion vote accordingly.
5/ IF the legislative branch after an investigation "just can't tell," THAT is a huge problem: Our voting system should be such that allegations of fraud can be shown to be false & the tallies can be replicated.
6/ If they "just can't tell," they have 3 options: Trump, Biden, neither. Even if the popular vote was illegitimate, ANY would be legitimate because the constitution gives them that authority. Electors for Biden, even if they conclude Trump won popular vote, would likewise
7/ be legitimate because the constitution gave the legislative branch that sole power. BUT if they "just can't tell," the legislative branch needs to also remake the entire election system so they can tell in the future.
8/8 Legislators won't want to own this because they will make enemies no matter what they decide. We need to demand they step up--and if they refuse THAT is a decision too. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FWIW: I'm not hopeful, but it isn't impossible. And "it is what it is." I'm not going to say Biden isn't my president if he's inaugurated. But Trump also should continue to fight if only to expose fraud, counting of illegal votes, and lack integrity in American elections.1/
2/ When Repubs. seek to clean voter rolls, to establish voter ID, to ensure oversight on counting, to limit "easy voting," they're accused of seeking to "suppress" the vote. No, it is seeking to suppress fraud, ensure integrity of vote, and to protect against disenfranchisement.
3/ Because when someone commits fraud, or an illegal vote is counted, that disenfranchises an American's legal vote. And that the results wouldn't have changed is not an answer--we'll never know, one, and two, every proven fraud destroys the integrity of the vote.
So, I just have a hard time thinking folks who voted for Trump after the Access Hollywood tapes in 2016 would now say they just can't pull the level for Trump in 2020. On the other hand, Trump's leadership & policy has won over a lot of folks who didn't vote for him. /2
2/ And I don't see Biden having any more excitability than Hillary and think Hillary had better GOTV efforts. Trump also is polling better than any other Republican with blacks. So I just don't see how this adds up to Biden winning. That said, nothing would surprise me.
Here, I'll help you @HeathMayo 1) Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett 2) 200+ federal judges 3) Tax cut 4) Booming economy, lowest unemployment for everyone pre COVID, highest stock market 5) Stopped travel from China 6) No one died COVID b/c lack of capacity 1/
7/ Therapeutics and vaccines fastest ever 8/ Supports federalism 9/ Embassy to Israel 10/ Recognition of Israel and other peace movements 11/ More money for NATO from allies no money for WHO 12/ Undid damaging EO on gender 13/ Protects religious freedom 14/ Bans racist training
15/ Fired Comey and hired Barr 16/ Survived the coup
...and many more.
Okay, this is hilarious! Peter Strzok's attorney is telling Judge Sullivan that @SidneyPowell1 is violating a court order by filing these additional disclosures. 1/
2/ NOPE! The court order was to not file supplements to "pending motions," which were motions to withdraw and motion for dismissal b/c of prosecutorial misconduct. The government's motion to dismiss was not filed until later! And even Sullivan wouldn't dare say you can't file
3/ relevant evidence to that motion. But what makes it even richer?
THREAD: Tomorrow is hearing on Government's Motion to Dismiss criminal charge against @GenFlynn. I didn't have time to write up a lawsplainer tying in new exculpatory evidence @SidneyPowell1 and DOJ filed, so here's a thread. (Limiting comments until finished). 1/
2/ This @FDRLST provides the lawsplaining of the elements for 1001 charge and why DOJ properly filed motion to dismiss. In short, any "lies" were not material and no lies. thefederalist.com/2020/05/04/you…
3/ Starting with "no lies." Let's first point out that Statement of Offense undisputed and inaccurately stated Flynn lied about discussing sanctions. thefederalist.com/2020/06/01/new…