A note from PolitiFact's Editor-in-Chief @AngieHolan: Since the election, we’ve heard from many readers who are disappointed with our fact-checking work on the election results. Here are a few of the comments we’ve received. 
It's an unfortunate product of these polarized times that information deemed unfavorable toward a candidate is perceived as partisan.
Our role is not to make any candidate look good — and it’s certainly not to help any candidate win an election. It's to help you navigate a confusing information landscape and make sure you have access to accurate information.
We do take election fraud seriously, and we have checked out many statements over the years. This year, we haven’t seen evidence to support those claims. In fact, this election has been the most scrutinized of any we’ve seen in our 13 years of fact-checking.
It wouldn’t be right for us to report election results as in dispute when they’re not, or to say that a winner isn’t clear when it is. We would apply these same standards if the situation were reversed and Trump was leading Biden in the public vote counts.
We hope you’ll keep reading PolitiFact, even if you dislike our findings. A democracy depends on people being able to consider evidence and then deliberate on the best path forward.
Want a weekly rundown of our fact-checking, and analysis like this? Sign up for our email:
politifact.com/signup
politifact.com/signup
Read the whole email from this week: mailchi.mp/politifact/the…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
