Digging into the audit detail file and wow there’s a ton of information. For example: In Bryan County’s early votes, Biden did best in the first few days and on Saturday the 24th.
Cherokee County UOCAVA results: 151 Trump, 218 Biden
Whoever entered Gwinnett's audit data for mail absentees and provisionals clearly had no idea what they were doing, the county reported 119,820 undervotes in those categories in addition to the 125,951 regular votes
For comparison, the total number of undervotes reported in the other 158 counties in Georgia was 12,294, and there were 440 undervotes reported in Gwinnett's machine-marked ballots
There's a chance I'll figure out the exact error myself
Okay yeah no way that's happening
Gwinnett batch ABM5G-574VRP should presumably be marked as Absentee By Mail, not Advance
Gwinnett early voting results by location (I still need to figure out what “AIP/M” is)
To clarify – AIP is “absentee in person”. I'm not sure what location those ballots are from though. I lumped “AIP-VRP” in with the “AIP/M” batches because I assume it's where they dumped the write-ins from AIP/M
yeesh, Biden won early voting at the Buckhead Library 9,332 to 4,022
NYT has a map showing where the hand count differed from the machine count (in Floyd it's relative to the incomplete count) nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Looking at the precinct details, no candidate lost votes in any precinct overall, so I imagine there were some mail absentees that had been misclassified as provisionals. Or…maybe they were really provisionals and *now* they're being misclassified. Can't say which.
Also there’s not much point to a photo ID if you can’t see the person you’re trying to identify.
Would it be better than signature match? Uh, maybe, I’d need to think about that more. But if it would require the use of a printer, then absolutely not.
I didn’t mention it (except in response to detailed questions) because it was so few raw votes but Appling did indeed appear to be missing a couple dozen votes in its certified results