For the first question: No trials showing higher pCR w/ higher dose. Trials are actually remarkably consistent (no difference):
INTERACT pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31005204/
RECTAL-BOOST pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32565319/
Dose-Effect pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22592048/
#jc questions #radonc
❗️*However* ❗️
pCR doesn't matter to the patient! Only OS or QoL does! And pCR / tumour regression is not a surrogate for radiotherapy effects on OS, so why should we care about it? #radonc #jc
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25611452/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26723110/
If you think about it, we are actually unlikely to see a dose-response relationship for rectal cancer in the (neo-)adjuvant setting: Even if there exists a dose-response relationship, it must be very shallow
(Side note: pCR / tumour regression / neoadjuvant rectal score *might* be a surrogate for chemotherapy effects on OS or PFS, but not validated on trial level:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29206996/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29718095/
And data are inconsistent
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19759186/
#radonc #jc)
So what matters to patients? Organ preservation (NOM) would - but that depends on
1) clinical complete response (cCR), and
2) long term local control without surgery
#radonc #jc
Can we get more cCR with higher RT dose? pCR is different from cCR, so we can't rely just on the trials examining pCR. We only have the (old) data from Lyon R 96-02:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22579379/ #radonc #jc
On the other hand, the trials quoted above (INTERACT, RECTAL-BOOST, Dose-Effect) are consistent in showing an effect of dose escalation on tumour regression (TRG1-2). OR=1.6, OR=2.7, OR=1.9. This is still path endpoint, though, so still doesn't matter to patients #radonc #jc
There are ongoing trials testing radiation dose escalation for organ preservation / NOM:
APHRODITE ctru.leeds.ac.uk/aphrodite/
WW3 clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
So we have to wait for the outcome of these 😊
#radonc #jc
In the meantime, here are some data based on a literature-based meta-analyses #radonc #jc
estro.org/Congresses/EST… Image
This doesn't address the question of dose escalation for patients w/ risk of incomplete surgical resection: T4 tumours, pelvic side wall nodes, etc. To the best of my knowledge, we don't have firm evidence in this setting either - and I'm unsure if any ongoing trials? #radonc #jc
And here ends my tweetorial on rectal cancer dose escalation. That was probably far more than you wanted to know 😉 #radonc #jc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ane Appelt

Ane Appelt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cancerphysicist

18 Dec 19
After reviewing 'predictive modelling & radiomics' abstracts for #ESTRO202, I had quite a few thoughts. I've finally found time to organise them in a semi-coherent manner

To follow: Some common pitfalls in modelling & radiomics abstracts for clinical conferences #radonc #medphys
First of all, the basic stuff:
Get somebody who’s never seen your study before to read through the abstract - to ensure fundamental information isn't missing.
(And no, you won't notice yourself, because you’re too concerned with whether you can squeeze in another AUC value ...)
If you are submitting to a radiotherapy conference, maybe make clear what the relevance is for radiotherapy? Several image analysis / radiomics / AI abstracts were probably technically excellent, but I scored them low due to lack of radiotherapy relevance
Read 11 tweets
20 May 19
Part II of today’s tweetorial for International clinical trials day: #CTD2019 #ICTD2019

Why do you want to give physicists a central role in your radiotherapy trials?



#medphys #radonc
@ipemnews @EFOMP_org @aapmHQ @EORTC @CTRad_CChan
First, what characterises medical physicists?
- We're quantitative, systematic & analytical
- We're trained in modelling, data visualisation, & interpretation of evidence

(And sometimes we - by which I mean me - go exploring in caves, which is almost like running a trial 😅)
But importantly, we understand the opportunities and limitations in current technology & are uniquely placed to understand current gaps in knowledge.

We can ask

“How can we best utilise technology to improve outcomes?”
“Will this be achievable in daily practice?”
Read 22 tweets
20 May 19
Today is International Clinical Trials Day! #CTD2019

In the spirit of #CTD2019, I thought I’d take a bit of time to talk about medical physicists and radiotherapy trials #medphys #radonc
@ipemnews @EFOMP_org @aapmHQ
Why should radiotherapy trialists care about medical physicists? And why should physicists involve themselves in trials?
The short answer: It makes trials a whole lot better!

The slightly longer answer: It ensures maximum value from data that we are entrusted by patients

And the properly detailed answer will take a couple of tweetorials ☺️
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!