The plot of Miracle on 34th Street is wild. Santa Claus is the rightful king, speaking Dutch is a magic power, Quaker-level honesty gets you institutionalized, and the US Postal System is the legitimate judiciary. Sounds true.
USPS as Judiciary is plausible. They have to know what's going on materially. The Army has to know this stuff but only in wartime, the Courts are under NO similar performance pressure.
Also as the movie points out lower-court judges are often elected & therefore posturing. USPS is more disinterested.
The Achaemenids had a postal system, the Athenians had trials, reading Herodotus in college Freshman year it became clear to my Seminar that post-World-Wars America sees itself more as Persia than as Athens.
But it's unclear from Wikipedia (still haven't actually seen the movie) whether the movie portrays the USPS's ability to keep track of who's who and where as the outcome of a lawful causal process or just another mysterious magical power like speaking the truth or Dutch.
Probably an accurate association between speaking Dutch and speaking the Truth, both of which are magic powers only the true king can have. Santa Claus as the King of Calvinism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie I think this is being viewed from an angle that's causing debate behavior and a more fruitful behavior would be to rotate it to an angle that causes analysis behavior instead.
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie "There is nothing wrong with you" is a helpful but false statement from within a frame that reifies personal wrongness. But we can just decompose personal wrongness into its components!
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie There's approval and disapproval. There's error and disease. There's a particular parasitic behavior complex that involves reifiying disapproval as something like a permanent blemish and conflating that with error.
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun If that is right, then either the Hegelianism hypothesis follows or I'm making a wrong inference.
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun Otherwise, it seems to me that either you ought to actually dismiss me as too stupid to engage with, or try to explain to me the other game (or point me to an explanation).
The history of "convictions" is interesting - as I understand it (please correct if wrong), Christians popularized it to refer to dogma about sin, meaning condemnations. Later expansion to mean any belief is consistent with the assumption that pinning things down is for blaming.
In German, Schuld means debt, blame, sin, fault. Like karma (which as far as I can tell literally means causality), something you want to be free of. When memory is for tax collection, only forgetting frees and all anticipation constraints are convictions.
The term "epistemic" shares a root with πίστις, meaning "belief" and generally rendered in translations of the Christian Bible as "faith."
Brilliant comedic demonstration of why my Nei Gong practice for a year was "learning to stand without freaking out" before I advanced to "slowly step side to side," & why Feldenkrais builds so slowly up to "stand up from the ground":
Most meditation & yoga instruction is approximately this bad.
The bit where he "stabilizes" his legs with his arms is a perfect parody of the kind of developmental cope Feldenkrais describes in "The Potent Self."
Ate a bunch of butter topped with raw honey and salt yesterday, and I feel just fine today. Increasingly impressed by @bulletproofexec, who seems to hold an unusual posture with respect to health that involves just orienting towards value, not picking sides.
Paleo / low-carb / carnivore cluster is biased towards hunter-gatherer autonomy, against agricultural norms and social control, macho, individualistic. Vegan / puritan / low-fat / Kellogg cluster ends up promoting rules that favor people with compliant metabolism.
Butter is very clearly an agricultural food, but has the desirable performance and health attributes that the *logic* of paleo/keto/carnivore points towards. Honey violates crude versions of this logic but empirically is just good. Noticing both as good requires equipoise.