Suspect the next year of UK politics will involve a lot of Brexiteers inveighing about the SNP ...
... but through a double-layer of fantasy.
/1
The SNP's fantasy argument is just too obviously identical to the Brexit argument for Brexiteers to say "you want sovereignty and you're pretty sure it'll cost next to nothing/someone else will pay? Ridiculous!".
/2
So the dominant faction in nominally unionist politics will not only *not* be working to cut through the SNP's rhetoric ...
... they can't even open the subject without first applying a layer of their own bullshit.
/3
@rowena_kay@drjennings@JGForsyth It's a particularly weird deficit for that group because you'd think they'd be quite into Popper.
The error is in all the talk of The Science as if it were a singular noun, when instead it should be treated as a verb (to science = to disagree critically).
/1
@rowena_kay@drjennings@JGForsyth "Scientific Consensus" is the other thing lazy politicians (and journalists!) always reach for.
It's almost a contradiction in terms, but you can think of it as the excreta of science - or the non-living bark constantly shed as the tree grows.
/2
@rowena_kay@drjennings@JGForsyth It's a deficit of mandatory science education that it mostly focuses on the excreta of science not the actual process that produces it.
I think more space should be made for biography of scientists and the actual contemporary debates.
/3
The trend on immigration sentiment is starting to look like the pattern for Gay Marriage/toleration of homosexuality - i.e. opponents lose ground in public attitudes every year for decades - and then, suddenly, they lose ground *really fast*
(need a better chart pairing)
/2
As with sentiment on homosexuality, this isn't visibly connected to electoral politics - Conservatives picked up votes even as the public became more positive about homosexuality, as "anti-PC" parties picked up steam.
/3
But I think you can go further - it's lazy logic that pretends Corbyn/NotCorbyn is a binary.
/1
@TheScepticIsle@stephenkb Corbyn entering government as part of a shakey 3 party coalition with a technical majority of 8 is not Corbyn entering government on the back of 60 MP solely Labour majority.
/2
@TheScepticIsle@stephenkb If the logical goal is to avoid eventualities where Corbyn gets into office (weighted by likelihood x size of majority) in the next 5 years, you have to start there and work back.
/3