John Hayward Profile picture
23 Nov, 12 tweets, 2 min read
Legacy media looked like it was on the ropes during the Age of Blogging, but the transition of blogs to social media gave the legacy outlets a new niche as outrage brokers. The MSM can instantly turn huge stories into old news, or signal-boost 10 tweets into an urgent crisis.
Part of that symbiosis flows from lazy reporting and the hunger for 24/7 content. It became very noticeable over the past few years that many MSM "news" items are just reporters cobbling a story together from some tweets or Facebook posts.
Of course, the media signal-boosts "online outrage" that agrees with its political and cultural biases, and activists with the right political credentials are very good at getting their little outrage storms noticed, validated, and repeated by mainstream media.
It's easy to create a feedback loop: a few left-wing activists write outraged social media posts, the media picks it up, more social media "buzz" forms around the media story, another story gets written about the "firestorm" of controversy and "growing outrage."
Of course, you won't be getting that treatment if the media doesn't like your politics. If a real Internet grassroots firestorm of political incorrectness becomes too big to ignore, the MSM outrage brokers will try to make it look kooky, conspiratorial, radioactive, dangerous.
When media-approved outrage has been nursed into a Big Event, reporters start asking politicians (and, increasingly, corporations) how they plan to go about addressing the grievances and concerns of a "movement" that began as a busload of neurotic social media addicts.
When media-disapproved outrage grows too large to ignore, reporters begin asking politicians and CEOs to denounce it and distance themselves from it. Those leaders often know little about the previously-buried story, so they are easily bullied into snap denunciations.
Cultivated outrage allows small groups of people to completely rewrite our common culture, and they can usually get those changes codified with laws and corporate policies while the general public is still wondering what the hell just happened.
The Left has discovered corporations are easier to capture politically than the government, especially with this wonderful new tool of outrage storms nourished and promoted by legacy media. Corporate policy is increasingly the weapon of choice for coercing the general public.
Meanwhile, the outrage brokers can marginalize and disperse genuine grassroots movements, preventing them from gaining purchase with casual consumers of news and social media - and, crucially, blockading them from obtaining political support at the state and Beltway levels.
Everything that happened during the golden age of blogging was studied carefully by the Left. They laid plans to ensure nothing like the Tea Party, Rathergate, the rise of the Drudge Report, or the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth could ever happen again.
A key part of that strategy was preventing New Media from completely bypassing Old Media and making it obsolete. Instead, the Left fused Old and New Media to create today's outrage brokerage system, using legacy media to boost or muffle signals from the Internet as desired. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

20 Nov
This sinister "Great Reset" stuff suggests we really might be approaching the "end of history" this time - not with the worldwide acceptance of classical liberalism, but with its decisive rejection in favor of "soft" and "limited" authoritarianism.
The new consensus spreading among Western political elites is that some issues must be taken off the table, placed beyond the reach of voters, "settled" - and thus enforced - by power that cannot be subordinated to democracy.
In other words, the list of things "free people" don't get to vote against or refuse to accept grows longer. The size and power of centralized government swells to a scale undreamed-of by the founders of a constitutional republic. Very little of it can be voted out of office.
Read 14 tweets
20 Nov
It's entirely reasonable to say Trump's election lawyers need to produce hard evidence to back up their sweeping allegations, PDQ.

It's absurd to expect them to do it live on a talk show, as if they were carrying Marsellus Wallace's magic glowing briefcase from Pulp Fiction.
Host: You say thousands of votes were switched by corrupt computer software. You need to prove it.

Sidney Powell: Of course. I have the proof right here.

[opens briefcase, golden light spills out]

Host: Is that...?

Powell: Yes.

Host: Wow. OK, you win. I'm sold.
There is no way the "evidence" of the most serious claims is something that can be dangled in front of cameras. There is no way that attempting to do so would convince anyone, nor should it. The evidence will be extensively evaluated by experts and presented to judges.
Read 8 tweets
18 Nov
None of the restrictions on speech and other freedoms imposed in the name of fighting the coronavirus will go away when the pandemic subsides. They will be repurposed to serve other items on the elite agenda, which we'll be told are every bit as serious as Covid-19 was.
Old and busted: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of war!"

New hotness: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of the coronavirus!"
"Just as Americans came together and made great sacrifices to defeat Covid-19, so we must now come together and save our beloved planet from the pandemic of climate change."
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov
One of the worst contradictions of our debased republic is that we loudly insist voting is sacred, but we treat the actual ballots like toilet paper: Third World election systems, rampant fraud, clown-show counts and audits, election rules that keep getting looser.
You can't have it both ways. You can't insist voting is such a sacred privilege that it overrides every other consideration, while also treating the votes themselves as worthless junk - protected and counted far less assiduously than every state tracks its weekly lottery tickets.
If voting is a serious business, then it MUST be taken seriously, by both election officials and voters. That means firm rules and real effort for both casting AND counting the votes. Voting must be treated as a solemn duty, not an Internet poll to judge the cutest cat photo.
Read 13 tweets
17 Nov
The Dem student loan forgiveness scheme would turn higher education into an even worse example of Chumponomics: a system that relies on chumps who pay full freight to subsidize those who don't.

One of my first Chumponomics posts from 2014: redstate.com/jhayward13/201…
Chumponomics is essentially stealth socialism, and it's usually a prelude to open socialism. Socialists deliberately create a crisis of unfairness, then insist their ideology is the only way to resolve it. They did it with health insurance, and they'll do it with student loans.
Open borders immigration policy is a great example of Chumponomics. The people who worked hard and followed all the rules to immigrate legally - investing a great deal of their time, which has a hefty monetary value - get screwed as illegals are waved into the country.
Read 15 tweets
16 Nov
It might seem odd for a totalitarian socialist movement to run with slogans like "Abolish the Police," but it's perfectly consistent with their worldview. They despise the legitimate functions of limited government because they saddle the State with duties to sovereign citizens.
It's no coincidence that people who want to radically expand the size, power, and funding of our already titanic central government usually take a dim view of the things our constitutionally-limited federal system is SUPPOSED to be doing.
A government with sworn duties to all of its citizens is limited in power, especially if those duties take precedence over all the big plans socialists wish to impose through coercive force. Socialism requires unequal treatment by definition. It cannot function otherwise.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!