Humans can learn difficult skills when they get instant feedback. If you put too much salt in the sauce, your pasta will taste memorably bad.
But when the goal is to avoid rare negative outcomes, instant feedback tends to lead us astray.
Every time I cross a road on red, the world sends me the signal that this was fine: "I wasn't hit by a car! All good."
So I'll keep crossing the road on red even if I am incurring an irrationally large lifetime risk of being killed in a car accident to save a few seconds.
Exposure to covid works the same way.
If going to a large indoor gathering gives you a 1 in 20 chance of getting the virus, you’ll likely get away with it the first time.
If you then conclude that such gatherings are safe, and go to more, you're likely to fall sick eventually.
2. Individually Rational, Collectively Disastrous
We tend to think behavior that is justifiable on the individual level is also justifiable on the collective level. If eating a sugary treat is fine for me, it’s fine for all of us.
The dynamics of contagion don't work like that.
If there are few cases in your area—spoiler: there aren't—and you are young & healthy, hanging out with your friends may not pose a huge individual risk.
But if all young, healthy people decide to hang out with their friends, the number of cases is likely to rise precipitously.
3. Dangers are Hard to Recognize and Avoid
Many dangers we face in life are easy to spot.
Take fire. Most hot objects are easily identified. Your body tells you to stay away from them. Our norms discourage people from playing with fire. Everything conspires to keep us safe.
When we deal with an unaccustomed danger like a new virus, we can’t rely on any of these protective mechanisms.
The virus is invisible to the naked eye. And if someone holds out a hand to you, your instinct will be to shake it.
Avoiding a fire is easy; avoiding a virus is hard.
In time, we'll develop norms to help us keep these biases in check.
But while these adaptations are slow and imperfect, the logic of contagion is rapid and ruthless.
So please learn about the biases affecting all of us, and do what you can to stay safe.
[End.]
And with that, I'm logging out of Twitter again for a while!
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
(What I'm grateful for this year? Not having to spend the next four years thinking about Donald J. Trump every damn day.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The real lesson is that progressive elites have become increasingly out of touch with the sensibilities of working-class Americans of all backgrounds.
This blindspot opened a vacuum for an authoritarian populist with no regard for the norms of liberal democracy."
Donald Trump’s defeat suggests that the first draft of history—written by pundits, politicians, and political scientists over the past four years—was unduly pessimistic.
Over the past years, many Americans—including not only the president's supporters, but perhaps especially his opponents—concluded that he has revealed the "true" face of the United States.
But that is far too simple.
Trump caused staggering suffering and subjected the country’s democratic institutions to a frightening test.
But today, America accomplished a rare feat: to defeat an authoritarian populist at the polls.
This is a testament to the strength of the country's people institutions.
Ted Cruz is now on Fox News claiming that election officials in Philadelphia are "lawless," trying to conceal what's going on in order to potentially steal the election.
Utterly irresponsible.
"I'm frustrated that every time they close the doors and shut off the lights, they miraculously find more Democratic votes."
Cruz is angry, ranty, shouty.
Nearly like he's auditioning to replace Trump.
The contrast between highly responsible news anchors like Chris Wallace and completely irresponsible pundits like Tucker and Hannity is really astounding.
Right now, the divide between the reality-based community and Trump's fantasy world runs straight through Fox News.
I'm starting to feel pretty damn good about America today.
Is this the grand univocal rejection of Trumpism many of us hoped for? No.
But the United States is doing better than Poland, Hungary, Turkey, India and so many other countries that were in a similar predicament.
It's time to take yes for an answer!
Why am I so much more optimistic today? Because of my baseline.
I've been arguing for years that populists have broad support and are a grave threat to democracy around the world. The fight will go on after today. That shouldn't be surprising.