Right, have figured out what's happened to normal public service spending for next year - it's been cut by £10bn vs what was set out back in March. So £14.8bn increase next year is 40% less than previously planned
Why is this important? Because it points to the structural challenge the government has in rhetorically sticking to it's pre-crisis strategy of ending austerity/loads of money around, while substantively trying to tone it down given we have a smaller economy
Chancellor is basically hoping he can spend like hell on Covid, but hold the line on IT ALL being temporary. This is a bold assumption (think health, social care, - not to mention it requires him to cut £1000 from 6million families in April which isnt going to happen)
In chart form

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Torsten Bell

Torsten Bell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TorstenBell

26 Nov
Something we didn't have time to do justice to overnight... defence spending. I think most people will be quite surprised by what is going on
You'll remember a few weeks back the Prime Minister announced a multi-year settlement for defence - containing the "largest military investment in 30 years" gov.uk/government/new…
The papers that focus on these things were very happy - this signalled the "end of an era of retreat". You'd have thought a hiring spree for soldiers, pilots and cyber warfare experts was coming. But... telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/…
Read 6 tweets
25 Nov
Here we go- Chancellor is on his feet, so we're off Spending Review wise. Expect:
- grim economic news
- more spending (lots of it)
- warnings of tax rises/spending restraint to come (but almost none of it set out - unless it largely affects people in other countries)
Chancellors wants to save "lives and livelihoods" - we know because he told us twice in about ten seconds
First announcement: extra spending needed to tackle covid next year = £55bn. This isnt a one year hit
Read 15 tweets
24 Nov
Government has now announced headline details of their new employment support scheme - £2.9bn over 3 years to "help one million unemployed people in their job search"
£2.9 billion is a lot for this type of scheme (means more over the coming 3 years than was spent in 5 on a similar scheme, the Work Programme, after the financial crisis
This scheme will offer support to those out of work for more than a year - which is an important group to focus on given long term out of work do particularly badly when unemployment is high (ie because firms can hire those only recently exiting other jobs)
Read 6 tweets
24 Nov
To distract us from the excitement of who you will/wont see over Christmas the government is putting on a Spending Review tomorrow. What should you expect?
New economic forecasts will show this year's disaster wasnt quite as disastrous as @OBR_UK thought in July BUT economy will be over 10 per cent smaller this year than pre-crisis = biggest fall in over 300 years. Image
Main impact of brilliant vaccine news is reduced uncertainty about when a full recovery can get underway - it won't magic away lasting economic damage. Expect a permanent 2 to 3% GDP hit by mid 2020s = £1,000 for every adult (this is much lower than previous crisis) Image
Read 10 tweets
24 Nov
Times reporting that new National Living Wage rate for next year will be announced tomorrow. Headline is an 18p increase (ignore the headline about the rise being “scrapped” - that’s not right) thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/r…
This is a smaller increase than we’ve been used to (big rises seen since 2016) BUT would still leave National Living Wage on course to hit its target of eliminating low pay in middle of 2020s because target is set relative to (lower than thought pre-pandemic) typical pay levels Image
Crucial background here is that low paid workers have faced the biggest health risks AND biggest economic hits from this crisis Image
Read 4 tweets
16 Nov
We're now eight months into this crisis - what has it done to family budgets? A thread.
The economy reopening over the summer only saw small reductions in income falls (partly because unemployment also rose, and partly because policy protected families from depths of initial GDP falls) Image
Income hits have been quite persistent ie over 80% of those who had lower incomes recently had also had lower incomes during the first lockdown. This matters - bigger income hits are harder to deal with, but so are longer lasting ones Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!