We're now eight months into this crisis - what has it done to family budgets? A thread.
The economy reopening over the summer only saw small reductions in income falls (partly because unemployment also rose, and partly because policy protected families from depths of initial GDP falls)
Income hits have been quite persistent ie over 80% of those who had lower incomes recently had also had lower incomes during the first lockdown. This matters - bigger income hits are harder to deal with, but so are longer lasting ones
The labour market shock to households is largest for lower (but not the lowest, where fewer people work) income households. However...
...the overall income hit has been fairly even across different income groups - this reflects that policy has helped lower income households
Does that mean the crisis has been felt equally? Nope.
If you missed out on support (ie lost work but werent furloughed or didnt qualify for Self-Employed Income Support Scheme) the income hits are huge - the same is true for those newly relying on benefits
While income hits have been evenly shared, it is MUCH easier for higher income families to reduce spending (in fact the economic side of this crisis is all about better off families no longer spending on services that = lower earners jobs). Result? Bottom is squeezed + top saves
This shows up in who is most likely to be drawing down on savings to cope (=those with the lowest savings) or to be borrowing (those on lower incomes)
Last chart (I promise) - but an important one... the impact on families is about how long an income hit lasts not just how deep it is. 1-in-3 adults whose incomes have been persistently lower during this crisis cannot now afford basic items (e.g fresh fruit/veg or heating)
All this and more is in today's @resfoundation report from @karlhandscomb and Lindsay Judge - which is kindly supported by @HealthFdn resolutionfoundation.org/publications/c…
You can watch this morning's launch event with @OfficeGSBrown and @BethRigby - which got into what government needs to do about this (short version: we can't be cutting benefits this April from families already struggling with persistent income falls) resolutionfoundation.org/events/coping-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Torsten Bell

Torsten Bell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TorstenBell

5 Nov
More I ponder it, more the full reversal of economic policy today to where we were in lockdown I (ie full furlough everywhere for every sector) is extraordinary
It's hard to keep track of the many different furlough schemes... so forget the schemes names and focus on specifically what has changed today and for which firms
For the hardest hit sectors that are legally required to close in lockdown II (hospitality/leisure/most retail) or tier 3 areas post lockdown (hospitality/leisure) NOTHING has changed
Read 10 tweets
5 Nov
Announcement = furlough scheme is extended until end of March at 80% of previous wages. This basically completes the slow u-turn over the last few months
So he's decided it's too complex to try and make furlough tied to specific restrictions and gone for the "keep it everywhere right through the winter" option
Self-employment grants also increased to 80% of previous earnings for three months to January (doubling them from the planned 40% a week ago and the announced 55% a few days back). This scheme is far too generous to some, while excluding hundreds of thousands badly needing help
Read 8 tweets
15 Oct
The spread of local lockdowns is rightly seeing everyone raising the issue of inadequacy of economic support, from local leaders to Louise Casey. But it's really important to focus on the right problem...
Because it's easy to communicate/attack debates are focusing on the LEVEL of furlough support (falling from 80% to 66%). This is important but the much bigger issue is the breadth of who gets that support at all. Our huge problem is eligibility not levels. Here's why
First, eligibility is what matters because there is a gaping chasm in the cash you get if you receive the 66% of previous earnings via the Job Support Scheme. Those not eligible and losing work as a result get roughly half the support of those on the JSS. HALF!
Read 5 tweets
3 Oct
Cutting benefit by £1,000 for millions of families - some history lessons... A thread resolutionfoundation.org/publications/d…
It's exactly 5yrs since G. Osborne arrived at Tory conference under fire for plans to cut tax credits by £1,000+. A month later he'd u-turned. Today Rishi Sunak begins his (virtual) conference defending similar plans. He should u-turn too and here's 5 reasons why he probably will
1. Sunak’s planned cut to benefits is MUCH bigger than Osborne’s in 2015. This time 6m households will lose £1,000 each next April vs 3.3 million 5yrs back - that adds up to an £8bn income reduction this time vs less than £4bn last time
Read 8 tweets
28 Sep
Definitely no tension between abolishing inheritance tax and paying NHS staff more. None at all.
4% of estates paid ANY inheritance tax in 2015-16. FOUR. Scrapping it costs around £5bn - 40% of which would go to just 1,700 estates worth over £2 million (who would get an AVERAGE tax cut of just over £1 million)
Where would benefits from scrapping inheritance tax? London and the South East. Levelling up it is not Image
Read 4 tweets
25 Sep
Full @resfoundation analysis of the Chancellor's Winter Economy Plan (with thanks to the team for sleep loss overnight). The short version: the policy does not match the rhetoric on protecting "viable jobs". A thread... resolutionfoundation.org/publications/t…
Economic context matters here - we're not living a V-shaped recovery. After swift bounce backs from total economic stagnation in lockdown, the recovery was slowing before the return of rising virus cases & social distancing restrictions confirmed difficult months lie ahead Image
The Chancellor job was therefore to bring economic policy back in line with both economic reality and social distancing restrictions - which he rightly did by extending support for firms and workers beyond cliff-edges at end October/early November
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!