Thankful for my first full day in my new home in NYC. So far, having 2 friends as flatmates seems simply good. I seem to have purged some neuroses about how things Should Be In A Place & some Containment fragments that were causing introversion.
It’s a furnished short term arrangement, and my bed is standing on its side so I have the square footage for floor sleeping, and kettlebell & asana practice.
Last night we bought a bunch of fruit from a local market & I ate a lot of it, so I worked off what might have been a sugar hangover with my daily kettlebell session.
Still had a light headache, which I think was caffeine withdrawal because I self-medicated with coffee for the move.
Cooked a 14 pound turkey we got as a gift from an activist in friend who gets too many gifts-in-kind for her to use or give away, and not enough actual help achieving her goals.
I cooked sliced "Korean sweet potatoes” / β€œbatatas” from the fruit market under the turkey. They look similar to the Japanese variety but tasted sweeter, custardey. Clearly best part of the meal. Similar to this preparation but without the "hanging":
A couple of friends came over with their toddler, and brought more food. I also made stuffing from a bag, and served homemade apple jack.
I also boiled some tejocotes we got from the market, in the hope that this would improve them over their mealy-sour-and-bitter raw state. The toddler liked them.
One flatmate made chai with whole spices and fresh ginger.
Tonight we watched the movie Ridicule, which is about the stage 4 simulacral nature of Versailles under Louis XVI (himself operating at stage 3) and a provincial engineer-aristocrat who just wanted to drain a literal swamp in his territory to save his peasants' lives.
Winning at court seems to be nothing but put-downs of other aristocrats in a contentless, zero-sum social game.
The stage 4 game is mind-destroying to the point where one major antagonist gets slapped down when he accidentally threatens the king to his face because he's so adapted to stage 4 games that he can't track the king's stage 3 interests.
Ridicule clarified the narcissism strategy for me: expecting to be assigned a desired approval-role in a stage-3 game.
A narcissist can push this expectation into intersubjectivity by getting upset when their expectations are violated, making it everyone's path of least resistance to just let you occupy the role. Narcissistic supply = others playing along.
A Sun-King seems like an apex narcissist. Louis XVI gets enough narcissistic supply to "win" all social conflicts despite otherwise not being a very skillful player.
The major antagonist, a clergyman, shows off with a clever speech "proving" god's existence, but then offers to the king that he can "prove" the opposite just as easily.
Louis, while he comes across as not very smart in most scenes, immediately notices that this is a poisoned gift, nominally flattering the king by offering to put him above God.
The price for this gift is the replacement of the stage 3 simulacral norms that make the king uniquely special with stage 4 norms by which he's just another cult leader. Louis correctly identifies "blasphemy" as a mortal threat and reciprocates.
Stage 3 simulacra will usually shoot the messenger because all messages from outside the stage 3 ideology look like either competing loyalties or bids to proceed to stage 4 nihilism.
Stage 3 interprets Stage 1's verbal rigidity as a revealed competing loyalty, and Stage 2's lies as a concealed competing loyalty.
There's another narcissistic aristocrat in Ridiculed who doesn't have enough narcissistic supply to achieve his ambitions. His face is frozen into an anxious mask, his attempts at friendliness are obviously insincere and desperate, and from the first sight of him he looks doomed.
It's very clear to me now why the French Revolution initially tried to get rid of the aristocrats but give the king a golden parachute of constitutional monarchy, and also why it could have seemed plausible that literally all of these people needed to be killed.
French aristocratic "wit" is explicitly contrasted with English "humor". French wit is not very clever or funny, because it's stage 4, fully general irony, doesn't know about underlying reality. English humor is always about something real, has content, expresses it cleverly.
The Heaven's Gate cult website is a wonderfully articulate account of a stage 3 simulacral mindset: heavensgate.com
"Truth" means receiving commands from the good authorities, "Falsehood" and "Evil" mean receiving commands from competing authorities.

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Anarcho-Moses 🐍

Anarcho-Moses 🐍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ben_r_hoffman

2 Feb
Betrayal trauma ought to be a matter of public concern, not just a personal medical issue. Applying @jjfreydcourage's insight to the recent coup: benjaminrosshoffman.com/the-trauma-cou…
@AgnesCallard I think this whole thing is quite relevant to your New York Times piece. The same elements keep showing up in multiple contexts: silencing through medicalization and making things strictly about personal feelings to avoid investigating what happened.
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov 20
@reasonisfun @DavidDeutschOxf @CurziRose @metaLulie I think this is being viewed from an angle that's causing debate behavior and a more fruitful behavior would be to rotate it to an angle that causes analysis behavior instead.
@reasonisfun @DavidDeutschOxf @CurziRose @metaLulie "There is nothing wrong with you" is a helpful but false statement from within a frame that reifies personal wrongness. But we can just decompose personal wrongness into its components!
@reasonisfun @DavidDeutschOxf @CurziRose @metaLulie There's approval and disapproval. There's error and disease. There's a particular parasitic behavior complex that involves reifiying disapproval as something like a permanent blemish and conflating that with error.
Read 10 tweets
22 Nov 20
The plot of Miracle on 34th Street is wild. Santa Claus is the rightful king, speaking Dutch is a magic power, Quaker-level honesty gets you institutionalized, and the US Postal System is the legitimate judiciary. Sounds true.
USPS as Judiciary is plausible. They have to know what's going on materially. The Army has to know this stuff but only in wartime, the Courts are under NO similar performance pressure.
Also as the movie points out lower-court judges are often elected & therefore posturing. USPS is more disinterested.
Read 6 tweets
13 Nov 20
@meditationstuff @reasonisfun I actually can't see it, and the Taoism thing in the other major thread-branch is my *sincere* attempt to steelman it:
@meditationstuff @reasonisfun If that is right, then either the Hegelianism hypothesis follows or I'm making a wrong inference.
@meditationstuff @reasonisfun Otherwise, it seems to me that either you ought to actually dismiss me as too stupid to engage with, or try to explain to me the other game (or point me to an explanation).
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov 20
The history of "convictions" is interesting - as I understand it (please correct if wrong), Christians popularized it to refer to dogma about sin, meaning condemnations. Later expansion to mean any belief is consistent with the assumption that pinning things down is for blaming.
In German, Schuld means debt, blame, sin, fault. Like karma (which as far as I can tell literally means causality), something you want to be free of. When memory is for tax collection, only forgetting frees and all anticipation constraints are convictions.
The term "epistemic" shares a root with πίστις, meaning "belief" and generally rendered in translations of the Christian Bible as "faith."
Read 9 tweets
10 Nov 20
Brilliant comedic demonstration of why my Nei Gong practice for a year was "learning to stand without freaking out" before I advanced to "slowly step side to side," & why Feldenkrais builds so slowly up to "stand up from the ground":
Most meditation & yoga instruction is approximately this bad.
The bit where he "stabilizes" his legs with his arms is a perfect parody of the kind of developmental cope Feldenkrais describes in "The Potent Self."
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!