Share this page!

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Twitter logo
27 Nov, 4 tweets, 2 min read
बहुत देर से इस बात का आग्रह कर रहा हूँ, शायद किसी के गले उतर ही गयी।

लेकिन @DrRPNishank जी इसे ठीक तरह लाना अवश्य है, आप चाहें तो इस पर मैं आपसे मिलकर सुझाव दे सकता हूँ।
But wait for the #EnglishApartheid system and the English media to launch massive spin and propaganda against this. The elite class won't give up their privilege easily. Already started.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education…
No, have to start at the top institutes. This is critical.

Every IIT can add the language of the state it is in.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
29 Nov
Khalistan is fuelled by a narrative war which began during British times—separation of Hindus and Sikhs. Pakistan built on it after 1971, with Congress' assistance.

J&K is a narrative war.

Force cannot fix narrative. Only counter-narrative can. Indian State is terrible at this.
Unfortunately narrative war is not part of BJP/RSS sanskara. But for India to rise they must invest in it, otherwise it will always be an uphill battle.

This requires serious investment. "Good work" alone won't do it.

@vinay1011 @narendramodi

For example, what kind of investment has India done in pro-actively countering Hindu-Sikh separation narrative or Islamic J&K narrative. "Secularism" is not narrative. The India narrative can only be constructed on a sanatan civilizational vision.

Read 6 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
29 Nov
Classic Scientism—science as a religion.

Can therapy X help?

Religious believer in Scientism—IT CANNOT. IT WOULD VIOLATE LAWS.

Scientist—Does it work empirically? If so that’s great, let’s investigate it. We may learn something new about the universe, improve our theories.
Is Science based on “common sense”? Lots of things that Science discovers defy common sense. The sky is not really blue, incidentally.

Sure, studies can control for the Placebo Effect. But religious belief would still not accept it.

https://t.co/HDHuO3ty4c
Multiple logical fallacies in a single statement. Not unexpected of religious believer in Scientism.

1. Ad Hominem
2. Strawman
3. False attribution

Like a religious zealot who believes “Bible=Truth” equates criticism of Scientism as “anti-Science.” 😆
https://t.co/T9ONHkyq7Q
Read 12 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
25 Nov
A short exposition of White privilege by a brown convert. 😏
There is a reason the first item on this list occurs a few decades after 1757. Guess what happened in 1757.

Dharampal documents Smallpox inoculation in India—from British archives. Soon after, West "discovers" it.
The problem with such Eurocentric history is that it takes the ignorance of Europe and presumes it to be the ignorance of the world. Like Europe thought the sun revolved around the earth, so the "world" did. You must also believe in "Arabic numbers" @raghurajs_hegde?
While Europe was a festering cesspool of dirt & disease, Hindu were well aware of the importance of hygiene and its role in the spread of disease. This is why they had elaborate hygiene rules, particularly concerning the exchange of bodily fluids like saliva and "jhoota."
Read 7 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
24 Nov
I went to an Ayurvedic doctor earlier this year. He helped restore my eyesight to 20-20 vision with eye exercises—these also help in onset of Glaucoma.

But he said there are some who he cannot help. Those who had eye surgery like Lasik. Creates long-term damage. Choose well.
If one needs surgery, today the skilled surgeons have been trained in allopathic colleges. But that simply due to suppression of Ayurveda during colonialism. Once an ecosystem of training in surgery is restored in Ayurveda, there is no reason why they won't have good surgeons.
Sri Sri Panchkarma centre and Sri Sri Ayurveda Hospital in BLR. Look it up.

Read 23 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
22 Nov
France does not have any special rights for “religious minorities” in its constitution. US does not have special rights for “religious minorities.”

In India these “minorities” were former rulers. These special rights are a form of colonial apartheid.

sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
India is not secular, nor is it Indic. It is largely a #ChristoIslamic Sharia state where Hindus are second class citizens and the government has huge “minority” schemes to incentivize conversion out of Hinduism. Including new ones by @narendramodi govt.

Jaziya tax on Hindus continues in the #ChristoIslamic state of India.

Read 4 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
21 Nov
Western medicine is not “evidence-based medicine.” It is authority-based medicine. It must be certified by the Church of medicine, a controlled ecosystem, to be valid.

Anything not certified is “heresy” aka “quackery.” People can’t decide if it works for them. Authorities must.
Evidence is pratyaksha. But there is a superstructure of authority to certify what is evidence. Who controls that? Who owns journals? What gets certified? Doctors can even be sued in the US for "un-certified" use even if they rely on years of experience.

I am not questioning evidence but the privilege of the structure of authority over evidence—authority-certified shabd pramana overrides pratyaksha pramana.

Which is why it is authority-based, not evidence based. Let's not get into "true science" fallacy.

Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @sankrant