@jessbrammar How do you reconcile your relentless smear campaign against academics researching alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria with the following facts?:- @ruskin147@Tim_Hayward_
3) and he even speculated that the WGSPM might be the victim of a malicious campaign to silence them
4) Jose Bustani, the OPCW's first Director General, has raised questions about the Douma alleged chemical weapon attack, the event that the academics have mainly been involved with researching:
6) Whistleblowers from the OPCW have now vindicated the work of the academics investigating these issues and many eminent voices have supported their concerns: couragefound.org/wp-content/upl…
7) Other journalists have covered the same issue including @ClarkeMicah and @SMaurizi, and yet you have seen fit to endorse a smear campaign against academics researching alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria: repubblica.it/esteri/2019/10…
10) So it seems likely that there is someone within the OPCW who is leaking disinformation with the aim of covering up what has been going on including, for example, the act of subterfuge when someone secretly redacted the original interim report hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2019/11/new-se…
11) Perhaps, rather than publishing hatchet jobs, @huffpost could investigate a little more closely what is going on within the OPCW?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) It appears from this that the late James Le Mesurier was in communication with Kamm. Did he make contact out of the blue, or did someone else put him in touch with @oliverkamm?
1) You also claim that 'reading the OPCW report, it's clear that the inspectors took the idea that the attack might have been faked very seriously. They discussed it as a scenario and tested their evidence against that possibility." Can you evidence this?
2) This is imp. because it was actually the original unpublished interim report and the toxicology minutes from the meeting with NATO chemical weapons experts that specified alternative hypotheses, whereas the published reports did not. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
In episode 7, the @bbc series 'Mayday' actually obfuscates key evidence with respect to the alleged chemical attack in Douma, 2018, which has been the focus of research by syriapropagandamedia.org. @chloehadj@ruskin147@Tim_Hayward_ Some facts:-
1) When requested by Professor Paul McKeigue to ask whether Raed Saleh of the White Helmets knew the burial location of the Douma victims, @chloehadj evaded as can be seen here:- syriapropagandamedia.org/public-stateme…
@georgemonbiot 's accusation of atrocity denial and truth distortion' by @ClarkeMicah is misleading. In fact, it is Monbiot who has consistently ignored extensive evidence that challenges his beliefs regarding alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria. This evidence includes:-
2) Leaked documents have confirmed that OPCW inspectors had their analyses censored and suppressed in order to ensure the final report reached a 'preordained conclusion' wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/#OP…