1/17 Important new @NHSEngland consultation paper on speeding up integration of health and care and system working at local level issued yesterday: england.nhs.uk/wp-content/upl…. Some initial thoughts in my new tweet thread below. @NHSProviders briefing here: nhsproviders.org/media/690574/2…
2/17 Document sets out detailed proposals for how health & care integration should work on ground going forward, from April 2021. And legislative options for NHS Bill next year on how to put ICSs on statutory basis (from April 2022?) Therefore triggers a very important debate.
3/17 Universal support for the need to speed up integration of health and care at local level, so strong agreement on the strategic direction of travel. Important to remember this as there will be different views, some of them strongly held, on the details of how to do this.
4/17 Every trust leader I know wants to work much more closely, at pace, with primary care, social care, local authority & 3rd sector partners on their patch. And the same with neighbouring trusts in their wider system. COVID-19 completely reinforced value & importance of this.
5/17 Given that 80% of care is delivered on a trust's immediate patch, trust leaders will therefore welcome the strong focus in the new proposals on "place". As places like Wigan and St Helens have shown, integrating health and care at neighbourhood and place levels is vital...
6/17 ...This isn't just about system working on an ICS/STP footprint - Cheshire & Merseyside / Greater Manchester - important though that is. Previous policy on system working failed to fully acknowledge this, so it's very positive that this has now been corrected.
7/17 Trust leaders will also strongly welcome the focus on providers working together in collaboratives. COVID-19 is clearly showing that the NHS provides the best care and outcomes when providers work together. We need a broad definition of what provider collaboratives mean...
8/17 ...COVID-19 has shown power of NHS trusts working together in an ICS/STP to share PPE & supplies, recover waiting lists, exchange & train staff & temporarily reconfigure services to make best use of resources. Maximising benefit of working in a National Health Service...
9/17 ...But COVID-19 has also shown the power of acute hospital, community services, mental health, ambulances, GPs surgeries / primary care and social care seamlessly working together at place level, below the ICS/STP level. Both forms of provider collaborative are important.
10/17 Trusts will also strongly welcome move to strategic commissioning at a system level. This will eliminate the waste and duplication we've seen too often when clinical commissioning has turned into excessively detailed, tactical, unnecessary, low level, contract management.
11/17 So, strong support for strategic principles of 1. Speed up health & care integration. 2. Strong focus on place as well as ICS/STP system level. 3. Enable more and better collaborative working between providers. 4. Strategic commissioning at the system level.
12/17 Key, as ever, is detail of how to make this work in practice. The new document shows that getting the accountability, governance, financial flows, oversight, regulation and statutory underpinning of all this - the "plumbing and wiring" - will be complex and difficult....
13/17 ...There's a huge amount of risk, financial and human resource and complexity to manage in health and care. And, ultimately, patients' lives are at stake. So good and clear governance, accountability, assurance, risk management and oversight couldn't be more vital.
14/17 The proposed approach requires the right balance / relationships between providers, provider collaboratives, neighbourhoods (including Primary Care Networks), places, systems, @NHSEngland regions, @NHSEngland nationally, local authorities and the 3rd sector.....
15/17 ...That's a lot of players on a pitch! We must be clear about who does what, who is accountable for what, and how the money flows. We must ensure that the strategic intent and the law fully align, unlike the current position. We must avoid duplication and overlap.
16/17 We must ensure that each statutory body has the right, effective & transparent governance with appropriate public involvement and accountability and non-executive input. We must also remember THE strategic intent is to integrate health & care, not top down reorganise NHS.
17/17 There's a huge amount to do to get this detail right. It's vital this is done in full collaboration with frontline leaders who will have to make it work on the ground. We welcome the engagement the document starts, but this needs to be genuine, full, co-design!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Hopson

Chris Hopson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisCEOHopson

20 Nov
1/19 What should happen on December 3? My new blog: nhsproviders.org/news-blogs/blo…. Covered in today's Times: thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/m…. Tweet thread below sets out why the NHS is worried about the risk of trading looser restrictions for Xmas for a third phase of covid over winter.
2/19 Where are we now on infections rates and admissions levels? Welcome signs that rate of hospital admissions in Liverpool/Manchester finally starting to slow down. But this hasn’t yet happened consistently in rest of country. Worrying rates of increase in some places......
3/19 ...It’s therefore still too early to tell if our current national lockdown will have the consistent effect that’s needed. The working assumption is that it will do, but the next five to seven days will be crucial in confirming that.
Read 19 tweets
4 Nov
1/11 Some are arguing that because hospital intensive care is currently no busier than normal for majority of trusts, national lockdown isn't justifiable. See, for example this: telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/0…. This ignores three key issues and the argument is therefore erroneous.
2/11 Issue 1. Measuring the degree of pressure in a hospital just by looking at its ICU capacity is wrong and potentially very misleading. Hospital CEOs saying that you need to look at general and acute ward bed pressure as well as ICU bed pressure...
3/11 ...At the moment, hospital CEOs tell us that the pressure is often greater in acute and general beds and not in intensive care. This is partly because many more covid-19 patients are being treated with oxygen therapy on general wards than in the first phase.
Read 12 tweets
1 Nov
1/17 Where are we up to? The NHS trust perspective on the current COVID-19 second surge and the imminent national lockdown set out below in one of my threads. Usual statement at the top - @NHSProviders is the voice of NHS trusts. We are not the Government or @NHSEngland.
2/17 NHS trust leaders have been saying for a very long time that the task they faced this winter already looked very difficult. Clear risk of a “perfect storm”: full blown second covid surge, usual winter pressures as well as recovering important care backlogs from first phase…
3/17 …At a point when NHS capacity has been reduced (hospital trusts saying by between 10-30%) due to need to keep covid and non-covid patients separate. And when staff are tired, with risk of sickness absence rising in any covid second surge. All on top of 80,000 vacancies.
Read 18 tweets
1 Nov
1/6 A final twitter plug for the lecture I delivered to @ActuaryCompany this week on the lessons to learn, as a nation, from covid-19. I asked five questions, deliberately taking a wider, stand-back, view of what has happened so far...actuariescompany.co.uk/chris-hopson-c…
2/6 Q1. Do we need to improve the way we manage infrequent, but very high impact, way of life changing, events such as global pandemics? Many organisations (e.g. NHS trusts) spend a lot of time thinking about how to better manage risk. Do we now need to do this as a nation?
3/6 Q2. Most of big, way of life threatening, risks are global - they transcend nation state boundaries. So do we, as a nation, need to do more to strengthen the currently weak international architecture to manage those risks? We are in a potentially good position to do so.
Read 6 tweets
25 Oct
1/14 Front page story from @thesundaytimes on how NHS treated patients in first phase of covid-19. We think it's given an inaccurate and misleading picture of what happened. Initial thread below. Gathering more detail from members to add to a blog later this week.
2/14 Article alleges NHS was routinely excluding elderly patients from hospitals / intensive care during first phase of covid-19. Evidence includes routine usage of triage tool to deny critical care & not admitting care home patients. Trusts tell us this is incorrect.
3/14 Some facts from an NHS trust perspective. 1.The NHS did not run out of critical care capacity at any point during the first phase of covid-19. Critical care capacity remained available to everybody who would benefit from it. The key is the concept of “benefit from it”.
Read 14 tweets
12 Oct
1/14 Important new blog for @timesredbox on why the NHS needs the Government and local authorities to now move quickly and decisively to create tougher local lockdowns wherever required:
thetimes.co.uk/article/hospit…
2/14 Increasing numbers of coronavirus cases have translated into rapidly rising hospital admissions, especially in NE, NW and Yorks. For a few trusts, the number of COVID-19 hospital patients is now at the same level they had reached at the height of the first phase.
3/14 Trust leaders clear about lessons from the first phase of COVID-19. The virus strikes at very different rates in different localities, so appropriate local responses are needed. The only way to control the spread of COVID-19 is by reducing social contact.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!