Canada's genocide denial is not as fringe as most people think. Here's another garbage piece published by the @nationalpost, written by non-expert Conrad Black, trying to defend Macdonald, an architect of Indigenous genocide, and grasping to put a positive spin on colonization. 
As an historian, that subtle is just, wow. 1. He did not end Canada's colonial status, that really didn't happen until the Statute of Westminster in 1931, and even after that, Canada was - and continues to be - very much a "colonial" country.
2. JAM was most certainly not "benign." He went to war with the Metis and Indigenous communities to steal resources, oversaw and defended deliberate starvation policies on the prairies, started the Indian Residential School system and defended it etc etc etc.
Here is more on this by @innes_rob: theconversation.com/john-a-macdona…
3. "Democratically elevated patriarch of the country he chiefly founded"? OK, no, JAM was one of many "fathers of confederation" "democratically" elected by very few, white male property owners who had the ability to vote, not to mention he was kicked out of office for corruption
4. "including all of its races and ethnicities." JAM was openly a white supremacist, so, get outta here with this "inclusive", "tolerant" rear-guard defensive garbage: activehistory.ca/2015/01/john-a…
That's just the inaccuracies in the article's *subtitle*. In short, I like @innes_rob's approach: Macdonald should not be forgotten, nor should he be uncritically celebrated like Black et al. do to defend Canada's nationalist mythology + the colonial status quo it keeps in tact.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
