Certain uneducated trolls are passing this "facts" screen shot around like its a share bag of Haribo, however its riddled with your usual guiltiers hope & dreams aka utter BS! 
1/
Robson/Safechuck say that they defended him under oath bc they did not yet understood that what MJ allegedly did was wrong or abuse.
Nowhere did they say in LN that MJs lawyers coached them & there is no way anyone could be coached to answer all those questions when MJ ⤵️
Robson/Safechuck say that they defended him under oath bc they did not yet understood that what MJ allegedly did was wrong or abuse.
Nowhere did they say in LN that MJs lawyers coached them & there is no way anyone could be coached to answer all those questions when MJ ⤵️
2/
wouldn't/didn't even know what the questions would be.
Which lawyer coached them & how exactly?
Safechuck never claimed that Jackson made him believe that he would go to jail. That is not part of his complaint(s), his declaration or what he said in Leaving Neverland.
wouldn't/didn't even know what the questions would be.
Which lawyer coached them & how exactly?
Safechuck never claimed that Jackson made him believe that he would go to jail. That is not part of his complaint(s), his declaration or what he said in Leaving Neverland.
3/
Robson however did make that claim, he testified in 2005, when he was 22 & admitted in his mental exam that by that time he did NOT believe that sex abuse victims go to jail.
He was confronted with this contradiction & he replied with a totally nonsensical word salad.
Robson however did make that claim, he testified in 2005, when he was 22 & admitted in his mental exam that by that time he did NOT believe that sex abuse victims go to jail.
He was confronted with this contradiction & he replied with a totally nonsensical word salad.
4/
Jackson did not pay the Chandlers $23mill but $15mill & if Michael was guilty of molesting Jordan, James & Wade alike why didn't he pay the Chandlers BEFORE they could go public? Makes no sense.
If the Chandlers had damning evidence why wasn't Jackson arrested & charged ⤵️
Jackson did not pay the Chandlers $23mill but $15mill & if Michael was guilty of molesting Jordan, James & Wade alike why didn't he pay the Chandlers BEFORE they could go public? Makes no sense.
If the Chandlers had damning evidence why wasn't Jackson arrested & charged ⤵️
5/
even before the settlement & before July 6th 1994 when Chandler told the DAs he was no longer willing to testify.
web.archive.org/web/2005122515…
even before the settlement & before July 6th 1994 when Chandler told the DAs he was no longer willing to testify.
web.archive.org/web/2005122515…
6/
Where was this damning evidence in 2005 when the DA could not introduce anything from the 1993 case but hose two books Michael did not even look into?
June testified in 2005 & she did not have any damning evidence.
reflectionsonthedance.com/04-11-05_FINAL…
Where was this damning evidence in 2005 when the DA could not introduce anything from the 1993 case but hose two books Michael did not even look into?
June testified in 2005 & she did not have any damning evidence.
reflectionsonthedance.com/04-11-05_FINAL…
7/
The CCTV footage does not show Michael in Zales let alone buying any ring. It showed him in the gift shop where according to the LA times he bought sunglasses & toys.
The LA Times report only said MJ was LOOKING at rings at Zales not that he bought any.
The CCTV footage does not show Michael in Zales let alone buying any ring. It showed him in the gift shop where according to the LA times he bought sunglasses & toys.
The LA Times report only said MJ was LOOKING at rings at Zales not that he bought any.
8/
Safechuck also does not claim in his complaint that Michael bought any ring that day at Zales.
Karen Faye said that Michael told her he was just looking at the cases trying to find out how they were lit. This is most likely, why people became suspicious.
Safechuck also does not claim in his complaint that Michael bought any ring that day at Zales.
Karen Faye said that Michael told her he was just looking at the cases trying to find out how they were lit. This is most likely, why people became suspicious.
9/
That tabloid story that he was trying to buy a ring for Cheryl Crow is utter fiction but something Safechuck could well remember.
The whole mock wedding story is right out of the Oscar Wilde case, Wilde & his procurer Alfred Taylor had mock weddings.
That tabloid story that he was trying to buy a ring for Cheryl Crow is utter fiction but something Safechuck could well remember.
The whole mock wedding story is right out of the Oscar Wilde case, Wilde & his procurer Alfred Taylor had mock weddings.
10/
This is one of multiple elements from the Wilde story which was used by Gutierrez to concoct the allegations for Safechuck.
Haters can't explain why MJ would want a mock wedding with Safechuck of all people whose story just happens to have 20+ elements from Gutierrez's ⤵️
This is one of multiple elements from the Wilde story which was used by Gutierrez to concoct the allegations for Safechuck.
Haters can't explain why MJ would want a mock wedding with Safechuck of all people whose story just happens to have 20+ elements from Gutierrez's ⤵️
11/
book & multiple elements from the Wilde case, Gutierrez's admitted inspiration.
Guiltiers cannot explain why Safechuck would keep those rings at all if he did not like to look at them.
Why would he have male rings if MJ looked for female rings when he bought them, why ⤵️
book & multiple elements from the Wilde case, Gutierrez's admitted inspiration.
Guiltiers cannot explain why Safechuck would keep those rings at all if he did not like to look at them.
Why would he have male rings if MJ looked for female rings when he bought them, why ⤵️
12/
was that scene staged & why was B Roll footage used with that whole handshaking BS, why Safechuck was holding back laughter when Oprah was asking him about that mock wedding
& what exactly proves that those rings were bought by MJ at all, and even if they were ⤵️
was that scene staged & why was B Roll footage used with that whole handshaking BS, why Safechuck was holding back laughter when Oprah was asking him about that mock wedding
& what exactly proves that those rings were bought by MJ at all, and even if they were ⤵️
13/
why wouldn't Michael buy rings for Safechuck when by his own admission he loved jewerly & Michael was known to be generous with many people & give them things if they said they liked them.
why wouldn't Michael buy rings for Safechuck when by his own admission he loved jewerly & Michael was known to be generous with many people & give them things if they said they liked them.
14/
They did NOT find any photo of any nude children, if they had found them, the DA would have wanted to show them to the jury.
The Spence photo never existed; judge Young himself ruled that story hearsay.
They did NOT find any photo of any nude children, if they had found them, the DA would have wanted to show them to the jury.
The Spence photo never existed; judge Young himself ruled that story hearsay.
15/
The only nude pictures of kids were in BOOKS, which Michael did not even look into, no fingerprints prove that he looked into either of those books & if he had of known about them he would have got rid of them in Aug 93 when Evan threatened him with a police raid.
The only nude pictures of kids were in BOOKS, which Michael did not even look into, no fingerprints prove that he looked into either of those books & if he had of known about them he would have got rid of them in Aug 93 when Evan threatened him with a police raid.
16/
While Michael did not obtain or store nude photos of boys, he did obtain & keep a nude photo of Jackie Onassis in his draw.
No pornographic material with any kids' DNA or Michaels DNA was found.
The Arvizos' fingerprints were found only because those two boys stole ⤵️
While Michael did not obtain or store nude photos of boys, he did obtain & keep a nude photo of Jackie Onassis in his draw.
No pornographic material with any kids' DNA or Michaels DNA was found.
The Arvizos' fingerprints were found only because those two boys stole ⤵️
17/
the code to his room, went in there & rummaged through his closet, found the suitecase which had those magazines.
How come the DA did not look for the fingerprints of other boys like Chandler, Robson or Safechuck if they were so sure they had too handled those magazines, ⤵️
the code to his room, went in there & rummaged through his closet, found the suitecase which had those magazines.
How come the DA did not look for the fingerprints of other boys like Chandler, Robson or Safechuck if they were so sure they had too handled those magazines, ⤵️
18/
because they knew they would not find any!
Also, someone who is into boys does not need 70+ magazines full of pics of nude women.
Michael DID deny that he slept with BOYS, as that is a lie of omission.
because they knew they would not find any!
Also, someone who is into boys does not need 70+ magazines full of pics of nude women.
Michael DID deny that he slept with BOYS, as that is a lie of omission.
19/
He emphasized in the Sawyer interview that he NEVER invited just BOYS to his room, ANYONE could go to his bed if they wanted to.
Also the very boys that did sleep there keep saying nothing happened even today, girls also slept in his bed, men slept there too, and what?
He emphasized in the Sawyer interview that he NEVER invited just BOYS to his room, ANYONE could go to his bed if they wanted to.
Also the very boys that did sleep there keep saying nothing happened even today, girls also slept in his bed, men slept there too, and what?
20/
No parents were paid to leave their sons alone with Michael!
This screen shot was clearly made by a guiltier who is drunk on tabloid kool-aid
#MJInnocent
No parents were paid to leave their sons alone with Michael!
This screen shot was clearly made by a guiltier who is drunk on tabloid kool-aid
#MJInnocent
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
