Given the proliferation of articles about #socialstudies teachers using racist learning resources and assignments I thought I’d write a tweet thread about selecting learning resources for teaching #socialstudies and #history
Studies provide many e.g.'s of omissions, falsehoods, mistruths, generalizations, and stereotypes in textbooks.
Increasingly, teachers are buying & selling classroom resources on for-profit educational sites that do not adequately vet their materials. slate.com/technology/202…
/2
Most #Canadian Ministries of Education no longer authorize learning resources and there is no process or system in place to vet and review learning resources for teaching #socialstudies and #history
Basically, it's up to the teacher to select learning resources
/3
In Canada, many K-7 #history and #socialstudies teachers do not have a background in history & the social sciences, and have had little training in teaching #socialstudies and #history.
Given this situation, I'm surprised there haven't been more incidents reported on SM.
/4
Teachers aren't passive users of materials who must follow the resource creators’ intentions, but are active & critical users.
The challenge: How to view textbooks & other resources not as givens, but as potential opportunities to utilize only if they serve our purposes?
/5
If we look upon resources as opportunities to be activated, then racist & flawed materials are a problem if teachers aren’t aware of its shortcomings and uses them unknowingly.
/6
That being said, all learning resources require scrutiny.
We can't presume that “good” materials can be used without vetting. All resources have been created for a particular purpose & are influenced by the creators’ gender, race, values, background, & experiences.
/7
Diverse digital, physical, and human resources can be used to teach almost every topic in the #socialstudies curriculum.
The challenge is not the absence of possibilities, but knowing where to locate suitable resources and find the time to access and review them.
/8
Two Principles for Building Diversity of Resources.
1. Accommodating diverse student needs & interests.
Identifying and differentiating resources that allow all students to learn, especially those with diverse abilities and exceptionalities.
/9
2. Embedding varied perspectives and versions. Ensure that a suitable range of perspectives is made available to students, particularly those that feature the voices and perspectives of people often ignored or excluded.
/10
Key Idea: The effectiveness of a resource depends on the purpose for which it is being used.
The purpose for the learning activity should drive the selection and use of the resource rather than letting the resource determine the learning.
/11
Two strategies to help us be goal-driven, not resource-driven
1. Adapt not adopt.
2. Teach against the resource
/12
1. Adapt not adopt
No resource will match our goals & the our students' needs perfectly, thus every resource requires some modification before it's used.
The ? we should ask for every resource: “How can I adapt it to better align it with my goals & the students I teach?”
/13
2. Teach against the resource
Invite students to challenge & revise resources to make them more accessible, accurate, or inclusive.
/14
Every resource needs to be reviewed to decide whether it meets the intended purposes, and if it is used, how it can be adapted and challenged so students are aware of its shortcomings.
/15
For e.g this popular grade 3 workbook was pulled from bookstore shelves because several passages (like the one below) inaccurately described the history of First Nations-settler relations.
Used unknowingly this resource propagates inaccurate & harmful (mis)understandings, but if teachers are aware of this issue, they could "teach against" the workbook, & provide students with resources that challenge this interpretation & invite students to revise/rewrite it.
/17
Lastly, we need to review all the resources we use in a social studies course or unit for patterns of exclusion and stereotypical representation using the following criteria:
/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My response to @jdmstewart1's op-ed in the @globeandmail today about the toppling of the statue of JAM.
For context, JDM is a history teacher at a private girls boarding school and has written a book "Being Prime Minister. Also, we disagree about almost everything.
The idea that without JAM the very existence of Canada "may be questioned" is counter-factual logic.
We don't know if Canada would've existed without JAM. Surely he played a key role in initiating Confederation, but there were many causal factors that also contributed.
What JDM fails to recognize is that the statue of JAM symbolizes the systemic racism towards Indigenous people and other groups. Making Canadians more aware of this history by tearing down a symbolic statue may in fact advance these causes.
Since 2016 I've been part of @projectDOHR, a community-based partnership that, “examines the experience of the Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children as part of the history and legacy of systemic and institutionalized racism” (Province of NS, 2015a: 4) dohr.ca
/1
The opportunity to work with former residents of the Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children (NSHCC), the NSHCC Restorative Inquiry, Victims of Institutional Child Exploitation Society (VOICES), educators, historians, and legal experts on this project has been transformative.
/2
Being immersed in African Nova Scotian and African Canadian history has been a tremendous learning experience and opened my eyes to events and issues in #cdnhist that I might not have known about otherwise.
/3
I am a great admirer of @samwineburg’s research and the contributions that he and @SHEG_Stanford have made to #historyed in the US and internationally cannot be understated, but there are a few conceptual issues with the #historicalthinking chart below.
HT is defined in terms of analyzing primary sources, but does not include other important 2nd order HT concepts including historical empathy, cause and consequence, continuity & change, progress & decline, historical significance, and the ethical dimension (amongst others).
/2
The chart doesn’t differentiate between written sources and visual sources such as maps, photographs, paintings, oral history that utilize many of the same questions, but also requires different questions, contextual knowledge, and methods of analysis.
/3
As pointed out by @samwineburg in the opening chapter of Why Learn History amazon.ca/Learn-History-… anxiety in the US over students' lack of knowledge of US history (as revealed by national tests like the NAEP and its predecessors) has been ongoing for more than a century.
/2
The NAEP history test has been criticized by history educators for many reasons.
Shuttleworth and Patterson (2019) criticized the NAEP for using misleading achievement level terms, which led to negative cross-partisan media reports tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
I decided to engage in a "good faith" twitter discussion with a fellow settler who asked "when does reconciliation end? We’ve been handing out land, money and other benefits for decades [to Indigenous people]" to see if a less-adversarial approach would be effective.
After 20+ tweets explaining the history of colonialism, clarifying assumptions, challenging myths and stereotypes, deconstructing arguments, and suggesting readings, the person said they appreciated the "respectful conversation" & were going to consider these points further.
Whether I actually "changed his mind" or gave him pause to reconsider his position remains to be seen.
The downside? It took a lot of time and energy to respond to his points in a way that did not offend him. Also, it was a lot more work for me than him.