1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 259

The vaccine news remains astoundingly positive. Reacting to my upbeat mood, a reporter asked me if there’s anything that keeps me up at night. Aside from the cataclysmic current state of Covid (likely to get worse, I fear), there are a few:
2/ First, the question of who gets the vaccine first is tricky. (Breaking news: @CDCgov panel just weighed in: tinyurl.com/y53atcys, and I agree.)

One can make a case for many groups to be first in line: healthcare workers; people >65 in nursing homes; essential workers…
3/ …(like food handlers, police, firefighters, & teachers); and people at high risk for bad outcomes (people over 65 and those w/ preexisting conditions). One can make an argument for all of them to get vaccinated as soon as possible. Alas, we quickly run into a math problem…
4/ …Namely, there won’t be enough vaccine for all these groups until spring. Thanks to @AriadneLabs, which did the legwork of removing duplicates (people who fit in multiple categories) to estimate the number of people in each of the possible Phase 1 groups. They add up to 144M.
5/ And here’s my estimate of how many people in U.S. can be vaccinated at various times in 2021. It’s based on statements made by @Pfizer, @moderna_tx & Op Warp Speed, and assumes we have enough vaccine to vaccinate 20M by Jan 2021, 150M by June, & the entire country by December.
6/ As the graph shows, I estimate it’ll be ~May before we get to all 144M of the high-priority folks. This timeline could shorten if additional vaccines are approved, and lengthen if there are rollout glitches. If demand is low, I assume we’ll just broaden the eligible groups.
7/ We'll see how people react to the draft CDC priority list. I’m concerned these decisions will be contentious and – this being Covid – politicized, since it will raise matters of race, homelessness, incarceration, elders, healthcare workers...in other words, myriad hot buttons.
8/ Herd immunity, which we should reach at ~70% vaccination, isn’t a magic on-off switch: as we close in on it, there will be fewer cases & fewer severe cases, since there'll be fewer people vulnerable to virus & fewer who'll get very sick if they do get Covid. So, even though…
9/ …we might not reach 70% protected until Sept., the impact of widespread vaccination will be felt before that. Also, there are tens of millions who are already immune via prior infection (and millions more each week, sadly), which will shorten the path to herd immunity a bit.
10/ Second issue that keeps me awake is the shot itself. We know that a fair # of folks will have symptoms – arm pain, fever, the blahs – that’ll last for 1-2 days. Seems a small price to pay for immunity to a terrible infection. But will this day of discomfort dissuade people…
11/ …from getting their shots? Probably some, particularly in lower-risk groups – & we’ll need many to take shots to get to herd immunity. Analogous to the challenge of getting low-risk folks to wear masks & buy health insurance – many are too selfish to accept pain for others.
12/ There will also be post-vaccination issues: when somebody has a post-vaccine fever, do we assume it’s the vaccine? Test for Covid if it lasts for >2 days? Should healthcare or essential workers come to work if they feel sick after their shot? We’ll need super-clear guidance.
13/ 3rd concern: misinformation. Below: if we vaccinate 10M Americans, how many will develop a serious illness in 2 months after they got their shots. Answer: many thousands (& I’ve only included 4 illnesses, plus death).

And the vaccines will have zero to do with any of them.
14/ Whether it’s anti-vaxxers or Russian bots, if somebody wants to turn every post-vaccine illness into a “See, I warned you” canard, there’ll be ample fodder. We’ll need a strong campaign to combat it, ie this tinyurl.com/y5ym92c5 Nothing I’ve seen in 2020 reassures me here.
15/ I also worry about next 6 mths – will folks let their guards down because vaccines are coming? That would be a terrible mistake – while vaccines will protect the recipients, they’ll do little to protect others in the community until we reach herd immunity levels next summer.
16/ Other worries: reviewing Biden’s appointees, from Covid task force to chief of staff Ron Klain, I have great confidence in their ability to pull off the logistics effectively, safely, & with minimum drama. But the first month of distribution will be done by Trump's team…
17/ … and, while they’ve managed Operation Warp Speed well, the Trumpers seem poised to throw monkey-wrenches into the handoffs. I doubt this will screw the whole thing up, but even a few weeks’ delay will lead to millions of preventable cases & thousands of preventable deaths.
18/ I worry about the impact of approved vaccines on ongoing trials. If we can get EUA’s for Pfizer, Moderna & Astra Zeneca, that’s probably a deep enough bench to vaccinate everybody in the U.S. But more would be better, particularly as we think about the vast worldwide needs.
19/ It’s going to get tougher to do placebo-controlled vaccine trials.(Is it ethical to randomize to placebo once 95% effective vaccines are available?). We may be forced to evaluate new vaccine candidates based on their similarities to ones we know work, which is a bit dicey.
20/ I worry about kids, since we haven’t even begun to test vaccines in them. But if we can reach herd immunity by vaccinating everybody else (incl. teachers), we may not need to obsess about reaching kids, particularly the youngest ones (who are at low risk for illness/spread).
21/ As I’ve said, while I do worry about uptake, I don’t worry too much. Unlike childhood vaccines, many people know friends & family who were sickened or died from Covid, & everybody wants their lives back. I’ll bet that uptake is going to be quite high, esp. in hi-risk groups.
22/ I do worry about keeping track of who got which vaccine. Who will remind a pt to come in for a 2nd dose, and be sure that the 2nd dose is the same brand as the first? If we had a national medical record (like the VA or the NHS), this would be easy. But in the U.S., it’s not.
23/ I worry a bit about how long immunity lasts, but also not too much. We’re now pretty confident that immunity lasts for >1 yr. If it turns out that we need a booster in 2-3 years, that'll be a small price to pay to save tens of thousands of lives and a return to normal life.
24/ So, yes, I do have worries. But let’s not lose sight of the fact that, on November 1st, we didn’t know for sure that we would have ANY effective vaccines. Today we have at least 2-3 highly effective ones, an impressive safety track record, and millions of doses ready to go.
25/ So yes I have worries, but the light at the end of the tunnel is increasingly bright. We just need to get there.

How confident am I? First, I’ll get my shot the day I’m eligible. And I just booked a golf trip in Sept. Perhaps living dangerously, I didn’t ask about refunds.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bob Wachter

Bob Wachter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bob_Wachter

25 Nov
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 252

Lots going on – I’ll try to go a bit beyond the headlines. Let’s start with a brief Public Service Announcement, then the Covid situation in SF, vaccine distribution, a little on schools, and then a crazy case of pharmaceutical serendipity.
2/ Short PSA: your plans for T-giving are set. My recommendation: add 10% more caution than you were planning. Open the windows, keep a fan going, sit 7 feet apart, not 6. Something. It might make a difference. And then enjoy, without guilt.
3/ On to SF. While we’re definitely “surging” here, we began at such a low baseline that our numbers are still fairly benign. It doesn’t mean they’ll stay that way, particularly if Thanksgiving brings people and virus closer together. And it definitely could do that (see #2).
Read 25 tweets
20 Nov
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 247

Fabulous @UCSF Covid Grand Rounds today: @DrPaulOffit @Penn on vaccines, @annieluet on treatments: tinyurl.com/y6swyu9e

I’ll start with a few SF & national updates, then summarize a few key points, mostly focused on the vaccine segment.
2/ Local update: interesting disconnect between cases vs. hospitalizations/deaths here in SF & @UCSFHospitals. While cases up in SF, @UCSF, we’re still pretty stable (Fig L): 15 pts, only 1 on vent. Test + rate mildly up: 4.85% in pts w/ symptoms; 0.78% in those without (Fig R).
3/ SF cases are still spiking, though maybe (wishful thinking?) a tiny plateau (Fig L), now 95/day. Hospitalizations pretty stable @ 41, 2x of two wks ago but not skyrocketing (Fig R). Deaths stable: 156 since start of Covid. Test positivity 1.97%: also up but still fairly good.
Read 25 tweets
19 Nov
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 244

One of the features of this stage of Covid is that we’re seeing more areas in which two or more complex issues influence one another. Today, I’ll cover a few of the most interesting ones – issues for which Venn diagram thinking is useful.
2/ The big one, of course, is the explosion of cases and hospitalizations around the U.S. – coming alongside a flood of positive news regarding vaccines. It feels like we're watching a Covid split-screen; on one screen a horror film, on the other a feel-good rom-com.
3/ Now that we’re looking at a pandemic that may be all-but-gone by fall (and an economy that may spring back), the case for fast, vigorous action to flatten the curve is even stronger. Obviously, the politics are hard (see: Michigan), but the right calls seem easier to identify.
Read 24 tweets
13 Nov
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 237

California hit its millionth case today. A milestone like that might seem an odd occasion to highlight the state as a national model for its Covid response. But I will.

Here's @nytimes piece marking millionth case tinyurl.com/y4e4zxnp
2/ I’m quoted in Times piece: “We’re so huge that this number can make it seem like we’re doing badly – & we are beginning to surge like the rest of the country – but in point of fact we are doing comparatively well.”

That, & what the U.S. can learn from CA, is today's topic.
3/ While CA’s numbers are going in the wrong direction, when compared to the Midwest we’re doing OK – at least not so badly that we can’t turn this thing around. The figure shows CA's per capita case rate, plotted against several Midwestern states.
Read 24 tweets
9 Nov
Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 237

Didn't plan to tweet today, but can’t resist a few quick takes on @pfizer vaccine news tinyurl.com/yygwoxwf

90% efficacy is far better than even most optimistic projections. An election analogy: these are CA results, rather than PA. (1/16)
The 90% is for preventing symptomatic disease (ie, fever, cough). But we don’t know yet how well this vaccine prevents severe symptoms that lead to hospitalizations, ICU admissions, & death. That’ll be key. It seems likely it will, but that still needs to be demonstrated. (2/16)
Now that the efficacy data are out, the next big question is safety. The need to wait two months to observe at least half the volunteers is the reason the vaccine won’t be ready to be considered by @US_FDA for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) until later this month. (3/16)
Read 16 tweets
9 Nov
Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 236

1/ I don’t know any scientists or clinicians who aren’t thrilled about Biden’s victory tinyurl.com/y43cwpln The only way to defeat Covid is by being frank about the challenges while following the science & evidence. Biden will do all of that.
2/ Biden is set to introduce his Covid team tomorrow, led by Obama's surgeon general @vivek_murthy, & @DavidAKesslerMD, former FDA head (& ex-@UCSF dean) tinyurl.com/y2rwyaks I know both well & am confident that they’ll be excellent leaders. (Role of M. Nunez-Smith still TBD.)
3/ Biden’s decision to announce this task force as his first major act as Prez-elect is important & strategic. He knows that if he doesn’t get the pandemic under control there’s little else he will achieve as #46.

And, it goes without saying that the administration’s success…
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!