First phase prioritization. Only difference is confirmation of 16 as minimum age for recieving the vaccine (for phase 1 only higher risk younger people)
Implementation to mitigate health inequalities
JCVI advice based on maximizing benefit (minimizing deaths) - operational constraints mentioned in press conference -
'whether or not that is actually doable is dependent on deployment and implementation' - Prof Lim JCVI
A bit of background. To get out of national Lockdown 1, we were promised a test trace and isolate system. That uses PCR tests. These are accurate, but take time to get results back. There were also significant issues in the way that the Government organized 'NHS' Test & Trace
The Government is now relying on a less accurate technology, Lateral Flow tests. In order to roll these out nationally, the Government tested these.
As soon as we come out of lockdown, we will have one million students moving around the country returning home. Some of these will be infected and will go on to spread the virus. Here's the latest data from PHE showing transmission last week in lockdown
With Tier 3 regions now having access to mass testing, this could lead to higher case rates (due to more positive cases being detected from these tests) and the likelihood that these areas stay in Tier 3 for longer.
When areas are reviewed on 16 December, we should take into account the number and type of tests being performed in each area.
Unfortunately, the data we now have doesn't distinguish between symptomatic (PCR) and asymptomatice (LFD with positives confirmed by PCR)
Demand for testing has also fallen, with the number of tests undertaken not following the trajectory of ONS survey data.
One way of analyzing this is to look at positivity (see here: