If there's one thing Trump is actually talented at, it's seeking the limelight. And he clearly wants to build a news channel and return to the White House in 2024. He might succeed.
But there are three obstacles that are widely overlooked.
1)
A big reason why Trump won in 2016 is that Americans saw him as a powerful winner.
Now, for the first time, he looks like a sore loser.
His veneer of invincibility is fading. Fear of what he might do next is giving way to laughter. He looks more weak and scared by the day.
2)
When Oprah started her network, she was the biggest star on TV. Yet OWN never rivaled the big four.
So if someone's pitching you on Trump News Network right now, be cautious. Taking on Fox News would be hard for anyone; Trump's record of failure makes me doubt he'll succeed.
3)
In 2005, George W. Bush had 90% approval among Republicans. By 2008, few candidates wanted him to campaign for them.
Each of the last five presidential candidates was very different from the last. The same could be true in 2024.
It's not obvious Trump would win a primary.
Trump certainly *could* stage a spectacular comeback and return to the White House.
But what's possible need not be likely. And the odds that Americans will grow bored of the histrionic antics of a sore loser they just kicked out of office are better than most seem to think.
Please read and share the full article @TheAtlantic!
Humans can learn difficult skills when they get instant feedback. If you put too much salt in the sauce, your pasta will taste memorably bad.
But when the goal is to avoid rare negative outcomes, instant feedback tends to lead us astray.
Every time I cross a road on red, the world sends me the signal that this was fine: "I wasn't hit by a car! All good."
So I'll keep crossing the road on red even if I am incurring an irrationally large lifetime risk of being killed in a car accident to save a few seconds.
"The real lesson is that progressive elites have become increasingly out of touch with the sensibilities of working-class Americans of all backgrounds.
This blindspot opened a vacuum for an authoritarian populist with no regard for the norms of liberal democracy."
Donald Trump’s defeat suggests that the first draft of history—written by pundits, politicians, and political scientists over the past four years—was unduly pessimistic.
Over the past years, many Americans—including not only the president's supporters, but perhaps especially his opponents—concluded that he has revealed the "true" face of the United States.
But that is far too simple.
Trump caused staggering suffering and subjected the country’s democratic institutions to a frightening test.
But today, America accomplished a rare feat: to defeat an authoritarian populist at the polls.
This is a testament to the strength of the country's people institutions.
Ted Cruz is now on Fox News claiming that election officials in Philadelphia are "lawless," trying to conceal what's going on in order to potentially steal the election.
Utterly irresponsible.
"I'm frustrated that every time they close the doors and shut off the lights, they miraculously find more Democratic votes."
Cruz is angry, ranty, shouty.
Nearly like he's auditioning to replace Trump.
The contrast between highly responsible news anchors like Chris Wallace and completely irresponsible pundits like Tucker and Hannity is really astounding.
Right now, the divide between the reality-based community and Trump's fantasy world runs straight through Fox News.
I'm starting to feel pretty damn good about America today.
Is this the grand univocal rejection of Trumpism many of us hoped for? No.
But the United States is doing better than Poland, Hungary, Turkey, India and so many other countries that were in a similar predicament.
It's time to take yes for an answer!
Why am I so much more optimistic today? Because of my baseline.
I've been arguing for years that populists have broad support and are a grave threat to democracy around the world. The fight will go on after today. That shouldn't be surprising.