We will not respond to all the half-baked claims and insinuations masquerading as journalism in the PN piece. Many of the errors in the report could have been avoided by diligent journalistic research which it is not our job to provide. #Lush#WPUK#SexMatters
We are disappointed to see the same old canards about WPUK funding and our campaign regurgitated despite the fact that we have refuted them time and time again. We have recently published this WPUK MythBusters womansplaceuk.org/2020/11/28/wpu…
WPUK welcomed statement made by #Lush (30/11) about its grant to our campaign and we share concerns expressed in that statement about toxicity of debate. We have been on the receiving end of that toxicity since our inception. Like Lush, we are very keen to see respectful debate.
It is therefore disappointing that #Lush has added to the toxicity of the discussion by making a further statement on 1 December in which they misrepresent our campaign. We are happy to discuss with Lush further, at any time, their misapprehensions. #WPUK
We are very grateful to #Lush for the generous grant of £3,000 which has helped us ensure women’s voices have been heard in public debate. We appreciate their pluralist approach to grant giving. We applaud them in supporting the rights of a range of disadvantaged/oppressed groups
We respect the decision #Lush has subsequently made not to fund “campaigning work, discussion or lobbying on the specifics of the proposed changes to Gender Recognition Act”. It is not the responsibility of private companies or businesses to facilitate respectful public debate.
Too many companies have adopted easy virtue-signalling stunts without addressing fundamental inequalities faced in society, including within their own business structures. #Lush#WPUK
Too often, such simplistic interventions have skewed discussion, exacerbated disadvantage and failed to tackle the underlying causes of inequality. #WPUK#Lush
In the UK, public bodies have a duty to foster good relations between those with different protected characteristics, to eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation prohibited by the Equality Act...
...and to advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.
We intend to continue making sure that such bodies do their job. #WPUK#lush
Thank you for all your support.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Some commentary on the case has argued that a win for Bell presents a risk to Gillick competence, which governs circumstances in which children have capacity to consent to medical treatment & to Fraser guidelines, which set out criteria for contraceptive advice & prescribing.”
“The argument before the court, however, is much narrower. It concerns whether informed consent can ever be gained given the specific nature of the treatment:
From the start, WPUK has faced smears, slurs, lies intended to discredit us. Our rebuttal to Pink News on the subject of the Lush grant womansplaceuk.org/2020/12/02/wpu…
We will not respond to all the half-baked claims and insinuations masquerading as journalism. Many errors could be avoided by diligent journalistic research. However, there are some falsehoods which must be corrected and we do so in this rebuttal. womansplaceuk.org/2020/12/02/wpu…
WPUK welcomed the statement made by Lush on 30 November about its grant to our campaign and we share the concerns expressed in that statement about the toxicity of debate. We have been on the receiving end of that toxicity since our inception.
“WPUK have managed to run a successful and growing campaign for women’s rights on a small budget sourced almost entirely from individual women and men who support us in what we do.
We are pleased to see that Edinburgh Labour Students have removed the statement they published yesterday which we believe defamed both our campaign and Ann Henderson.
We are disappointed that Edinburgh Labour Students have not responded to our email or our response or apologised for the false claims they have made about us.
We also note that the statement from 2018 which made the orginal defamatory allegations is still on the Edinburgh Labour Students Facebook page. This should be withdrawn as well.
A reminder to Edinburgh, Cambridge, all other universities:HE providers - “freedom of speech in HE should be upheld at every opportunity & should only be limited where there are genuine safety concerns or it constitutes unlawful behaviour.' equalityhumanrights.com/en/our-work/ne…
Thank you to Northumbria University for hosting our meeting in May 2018: A Woman’s Place is Standing Her Ground.
Thank you to Oxford University for hosting our meeting in October 2019: A Woman’s Place is at the lectern
Our response to the statement from Edinburgh Labour Students. We wrote last night to ask them to withdraw the statement. We have had no response. womansplaceuk.org/2020/10/26/edi…
“A stalwart of the labour movement, Ann has spent her whole adult life campaigning for equality and social justice. Repeated attempts to silence women who merely wish to debate the potential impact of a proposed change to the law are Orwellian...