This is an important illustration of the journey for white people. It's easy to assume that code switching is about speaking "properly". It's harder to internalize that it's really about a forced deference to your Whiteness.
Right. It hits different when you are the target. However that doesn't mean that you're being oppressed. It means you are being forced out of the limited view of reality that has been meticulously constructed for you.
That's what I mean when I say you don't have the range. Until you get dragged out of that limited bubble, you can't see the multitudes around you. You can't start to build better judgment about what is real harm and what is not. You're still working with the kindergarten rulebook
What do I mean by multitudes? Here's just one example.
1) Race is an invented construct. True. 2) White people don't wanna be white. Cause it has... baggage. True. 3) Black wanna be Black. We love our Blackness. Also true.
All these things are true at the same time.
So when we talk about "race", it's not a singular thing. It's not a binary that has to apply to everyone at once or nobody. We have to exist in a messy world where we are working to dismantle racial oppression but also I still get to be Black as fuck.
I was talking to @operaqueenie last night and I was frustrated. I have this core conceit within me that says it's not that fucking for white people to connect these dots. It's because you don't want to. Because the place it inevitably leads is threatening to your sense of self.
Right. But I would go further. Many white people cannot see the *real and material harm* that happens to PoC when we don't conform. They don't understand the mechanisms that activate to reject and exclude us in their name. It's often invisible to them.
What I mean is that it's not a direct cause and effect. You don't have to say "I don't want them working here because of the way they talk". All you have to do is say "I had a hard time understand them", and someone else will take care of it. The signals are covert and indirect.
There is a stage of this journey that often horrifies white people. When they learn what happens to us based on their "off-hand" comments. When they start to see the machine of oppression that activates regardless of their "good intentions".
Those who work in DEI have these singular experiences. Have you ever been at a place where they manage to hire 3 Black people on a row? Woo shit. All of a sudden it's "I'm worried we're going over board with diversity. Are we being unfair in the other direction?" Welp!
So you hire some more white people, which nobody seems to think is an issue. And then maybe you can have another Black person. You know, as a treat.
"They're not really a culture fit"
"I'm worried about their ability to talk to clients"
"They don't have the background we usually look for"
"I haven't heard of this school. Is it good?"
"They have a really loud laugh. That was off-putting" (No I'm not kidding, this happened)
This shit absolutely wrecks Black people's career prospects. And nobody had to say anything "racist". Nobody did anything "wrong". Nobody even had to explicitly say "no". Everybody's sense of self is intact. But there are no fucking Black people at your job. What a coincidence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You can learn a lot by really examining what is happening with Timnit Gebru. Both how she was used to bolster Google's brand and credibility and how she was ultimately sacrificed when she wouldn't fall in line.
I'm really interested in hearing from Jeff Dean. The Google exec who Gebru says is responsible for backstabbing her. Because here's the thing. He could be a villain. Or he could just be an example of spineless white men who follow orders to destroy PoC when we don't behave.
I'm only talking about this explicitly because Gebru has decided to share her story openly. Keep in mind that what she's doing can and probably will be incredibly damaging to her. But we have to start standing our ground against this kind of villainy. This is how things go bad.
Kevin is trying his best. He seems sincere. But he's exhibiting the core fallacy that blocks a lot of white people from engaging honestly in this discourse. This is a gross mischaracterization of what is happening when we say "white people". It's intellectually lazy and dishonest
Let me be extra clear for @kevinrwhitley and everyone else.
"lumping the *entire* population categorically into a single entity"
This is wrong. It is not what is happening. This framing is *entirely* about YOUR feelings. Not about what is actually being said.
Until you can hear the phrase "white people" without turning it into an absolute generalization in your head, you will find that you do not have the range that is necessary to participate in the discourse. That's it. That's a place to start.
It's #GivingTuesday, which means we gotta talk about @bbfounders. This organization was started by my wife @operaqueenie. After founding her own startup and going through the trials of trying to raise money from people who don't fund Black and brown folks.
Being who she is, she set out to create alternatives for our community. She wanted to create different ways to support entrepreneurship for those who are underrepresented and underestimated. The mission of @BBFounders is to provide community, education, and access to founders.
The organization is run by @deldelp. Besides being a good friend of mine, she has an incredible mind for seeing the actual mechanisms that drive change. The work she does in policy, in activism, and in community have been inspiring to me and taught me so much.
"the core functionality of these apps is not significantly different than having a servant. What the technology has done is — most importantly — make it possible to not think of them as servants at all."
This is a very American thing. It's also critical to create enough indirection that the workers also don't think of themselves as servants. Or at least obscure things enough for them to manage the cognitive dissonance.
I'm gonna try to say this in a way that doesn't sound blamey, but I may fail at it. A lot of us have this experience talking to people who are learning. We say "you should learn fundamentals". And the responses we get are often ones of frustration and impatience.
I'm not dismissing those feelings. I think I understand a lot about where they come from. But I would like to see the conversation about combatting that and helping the community to be open to this kind of advice. There is no shortcut to becoming more confident in your skills.
I'm also wondering if there's another lesson here though. Maybe there's no shortcut that prevents people from having to learn this lesson for themselves. All of the cultural baggage around "learn to code" is giving people the wrong message about they're getting into.
A lot of white people need to be deprogrammed. It felt weird to use that word at first, but I honestly think it’s the right one. Like they’re mostly okay. Then you hit this completely fictional reality written into the firmware and it just causes these glitches.
We need a whole curriculum for this. Maybe it’s like rehab or something. But somebody sits down with @NathanLerner like let’s go through history in detail until you understand some fundamental things you believe just are not true. They never were. Then let’s rebuild your values.
It seems like this person is trying to do good work. They want to enable a more progressive future for everyone. That’s great. Imagine what they could accomplish if they weren’t working with a fundamentally flawed value system. One that won’t allow them to see the work clearly.