As a comparative political scientist who often works with the case of #Japan, I have mixed feelings about stories in the @nytimes and other (US) media that highlight unrepresentative or "exotic" features of the country or its population. 🧵 1/n
On the one hand, as @jolyonbt points out, these stories can be frustrating because they reinforce stereotypes or facile tropes, and often miss complexities and diversities, as well as paint universally common behavior as somehow uniquely Japanese (see #Nihonjinron). 2/n
On the other hand, they keep Japan in the imagination of a population (Americans, especially) that is otherwise woefully ignorant and uninformed about other countries, and may inspire further engagement and inquiry. 3/n
As an academic who works on the case of Japan, it is often my role as a teacher to help contextualize the country, put it into comparative perspective, and disabuse students of popular (mis)perceptions of its uniqueness. 4/n
But the students who are attracted to my courses on Japan often first become interested because of curious tidbits of culture or history that they pick up from these kinds of news stories, or anime, J-pop, etc. 5/n
As a researcher, a huge frustration is having to justify to journal referees (mostly Americans) why they should care about Japan, or convince them that basic hypotheses tested with Japanese data are generalizable. And this attitude may stem from the "exoticization" of Japan. 6/n
At the same time, Japan *is* mysterious for many Americans, and the less it seems like "just any other country," the more demand (jobs!) there will be for academics who *do* understand it and can explain. 7/n
In recent years, there's been concern about the future of Japan studies at US universities. Many departments no longer have a Japan expert, and aren't pushing to hire one (often despite having established resources and centers). See @paularcurtisprcurtis.com/events/AAS2020/ 8/n
My view is that *any* media coverage is good for the job prospects of Japan experts. If it's a problematic take, it creates the opportunity to discuss and inform, and demonstrate why Japan expertise is still very much needed in higher education (and in media and government). 9/n
“There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.” -Oscar Wilde. 10/n
Finally, I don't think the issue is unique to US coverage of Japan. Many (most?) countries get entirely ignored or stereotyped by US media. And... 11/n
Japanese media coverage of the US is also frequently slanted or incompletely informed, and sometimes downright racist. See for example, recent controversies about NHK's coverage of #BLM, which @jolyonbt carefully discusses in broader context here: 12/n
Today is the 75th anniversary of the firebombing of Tokyo, which burned about 2.5 million houses and killed ~100,000 people (mostly civilians). Here is a short thread about some of the research on the firebombing and its long-term effects. 1/n
Prior to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the strategic bombing of Japan during WWII targeted 138 cities over several hundred campaigns. 2/n
These campaigns can be classified into two major phases: (1) from 1944, high-altitude bombings of targeted military facilities/industries; (2) from 1945, indiscriminate bombings of urban residential areas. 3/n
The newest "legacy candidate" in US politics is Amy Kennedy – wife of former Rep. Patrick Kennedy, son of Ted Kennedy and nephew of JFK – who will challenge former Democrat Jeff Van Drew in NJ-2. She probably has a good shot... 1/n politico.com/news/2020/02/1…
In our research (freshly updated version in link), @OlleFolke, @johannarickne and I explore why, at least historically, women have been more likely to be dynastic than their male counterparts. 2/n papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
@OlleFolke@johannarickne We argue that the signal of "quality" inherited from a predecessor differentially helps women more than men, due to the informational disadvantages of relative newcomers to politics, like women. 3/n