Most interview frameworks (and most work environments in general) tend to favor the verbally charismatic.
Verbal charisma is IME the #1 reason that otherwise-smart companies hire leaders who end up being quite incompetent on the job (and get fired in 6-18 months).
Since a bunch of folks asked about ways to identify such cases during the interview process, here's a thread with archetypes & concrete ways to detect each one:
Besides this, one skill I've tried to build over the years is to separate the message as much as possible from the messenger.
This helps me evaluate the quality of what is said (most important) independently from how it is said (fairly important) & who says it (least important).
-The CEO Test
-Understanding orgs
-Leadership & Tao Te Ching
-3 types of Prod Mgrs
-the product & The Product
-Upside-Downside framework
-Top 10 cognitive biases
-Gorilla Taxes & Startups
-What we need in Prod Mgmt
& much more....
Thread👇🏾
Compromising with conviction by using the CEO Test
Add these 10 biases to your product team's shared vocabulary
1–Confirmation Bias
2–Fundamental Attribution Error
3–Availability Heuristic
4–Plan Continuation Bias
5–Law of Triviality
6–Curse of Knowledge
7–Law of the Instrument
8–OutcomeBias
9–Bandwagon Effect
10–Bias Blind Spot
The benefits of deeply understanding these biases & creating psychological safety for surfacing them:
- Better product decisions
- Better execution
- Happier teams