A Missiological word on Critical Race Theory from an Evangélico to American Evangelicals (Pt 1):

Evangelicals can’t begin to process the battle we’re (self included) entrenched in if we don’t first look through the corridors of history to track how we got here.

(1/12)
18th Century: At one time Evangelicals were known for centering the Bible, the Crucifixion, Conversionism, & Social activism (see Bebbington). All the while at-large turning a blind eye to the sin of greed, chattel slavery, & the sin of partiality based on skin (racism).

(2/12)
It was the systemic sin of partiality practiced without repentance at St. George’s Methodist Episcopal in the “free North” that led Bishop Richard Allen to start Mother Bethel AME (Freedom’s Prophet by Richard S. Newman). The Black Church was born because of systemic sin.

(3/12)
Formal education for both those of African & Native Indigenous descent was feared by Evangelicals (The Great Awakening by Chacon & Sheffield).

It must be noted within the Anti-Slavery movement, systemic sin based on skin color was "blatant" (Theodore S. Wright).

(4/12)
19th Century: During the 2nd Great Awakening sinful partiality was visible in revivals (segregated seating & altars for responses) & theological compromise (“blacks don’t have souls”) was the norm (“North American Slave Narratives” UNC collection - docsouth.unc.edu/neh/

(5/12)
It's here normally Wilburforce’s work is referenced in a quasi-Christological federal headship way & applied to confessing Evangelicals. However, if Evangelicals ran in the same lane, there would be more content in the annals of history recording Evangelicalism's....

(6/12)
staunch opposition to & mobilization of overturning of Jim Crow Laws.

20th Century: As Fundamentalists took the steering wheel of Evangelicalism, those who fought for “biblical orthodoxy” also systemically denied Pastors of African descent enrollment....

(7/12)
at their “Conservative” Theological seminaries.

Fundamentalists created a theological binary, one was either ‘orthodox’ or ‘heretical’. Fundamentalism was understood as a ‘racialized term’ (Doctrine and Race by Mary Beth Swetnam Mathews).

(8/12)
Evangelicalism framed ‘orthodox Christianity’ around the life rhythms of “white, middle-class, educated Protestants” (Doctrine and Race; The Great Reversal by David Morberg).

(9/12)
The world outside of Evangelicalism saw America ran by a 'racial dictatorship' from the colonial era until the Civil rights era (Racial Formation in the US by Omni & Winant).

They saw no distinction in this racial dictatorship in the public square & Evangelicalism.

(10/12)
I share this brief history for this reason: decisions carry consequences. In 2020 we as Evangelicals are again facing a reckoning with the consequences of acceptable sinful actions going back to the 1700’s.

(11/12)
In Part 2 I will discuss the contemporary landscape of American Evangelicalism and why CRT (and those charged with being affiliated with CRT) are being attacked, as a way to avoid dealing with Evangelicalism’s consequences for past actions.

(12/12)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with D.A. Horton

D.A. Horton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @da_horton

3 Dec
As an Evangélico, I want to share a common pattern I've encountered inside of Evangelicalism the past couple decades to help provide insight for those engaged in fruitless online debates:

Step 1 - Make a hyperbolic claim about a specific person (or designated group).

(1/7)
Step 2 - When asked to provide evidence in support of said claim either:

(a) provide generalized anecdote(s)

(b) backpedal away from the specific person/group initially called out & shrewdly pivot to a broader group

(c) share a YouTube link

(d) all the above

(2/7)
Step 3 - Pivot the conversation by asking the person requesting evidence, to provide you with evidence to support their debunking of your initial claim. (Note: In this step it's okay to deny reading primary sources if you assert the Bible is your rule of faith & study)

(3/7)
Read 7 tweets
12 Sep
#SuicidePrevention Post:

This picture was taken during a time where severe depression, anxiety, & suicidal ideations were in my mind & heart non-stop.

I took this picture with my son Duce to remind me of the pain of abandonment my wife & kids would bear if I took my life.
A few years beforehand I opened up about my battles to people I trusted. Some didn’t understand, how I, a pastor and preacher of the Gospel could have such struggles. This inability to understand was no fault of theirs. I didn’t even understand my own struggles.
Others times I shared my struggles to others, they showed little interest, but used what I shared in vulnerability against me in later seasons of life.
Read 9 tweets
11 Jun
Since the move on Social Media among Jesus followers is a struggle to parse out the phrase #BlackLivesMatter from the BLM movement; there's a few nuances to consider lest we force an unnecessary binary in our dialogue.

#1 - Is the phrase "Black Lives Matter" true?
Even the "All Lives Matter"/ "Blue Lives Matter" crowds say yes its true because of the imago dei. Since it's a truthful statement, there's a freedom to say it, and equally freedom to not say it.

If one says it, this does not mean they categorically embrace the BLM mvmt. And
If one does not say it, this does not mean they're "racist" or reject the imago dei. With this matter, we must fight off forcing a binary where nuance is not only permissible but necessary.

#2. Regarding #BlackLivesMatter, we must ask the question "why, do Black Lives Matter?".
Read 8 tweets
1 Apr 19
🗣️ PSA 📢 GANG AFFILIATION

For many African American & Latina/o youth who are raised in communities of systemic brokenness (poverty, violence, etc) gang affiliation is a natural way of life. For many, there are no alternative options. There are nuances to be considered. (1/5)
For some, their family affiliation is 3-4 generations deep. It's woven into the fabric of the family identity, similar to religion. To walk away is not simply a 'death sentence', its worse, a life of lonely banishment from their own family structure. (2/5)
For some, it's making a life-altering decision at the age of 10 because they're tired of being jumped while walking home from the corner store, playground, school.

For some, it's about finally receiving positive affirmation from a male figure of the same ethnicity. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!