1. Well if someone hadn’t removed the context and allowed people like Clair Fox to interpret it in the context of her beliefs, then maybe things would have gone better today. (Thread)

2. Because when I read the article you posted, from the context it was presented, I believed that it was a big admission that the push to stay in the EU led to the hardest of Brexit.
3. Then when I read through it, it was about strategic mistakes which I didn’t think are overly controversial.
4. It certainly didn’t seem like the argument remotely backed a major admission as described.
5. Then I read it again and there is no major admission here as sold, but a straight forward point of fact.
6. First Peter wrote that our country is going to be disadvantaged and this was the price we will pay for trying to reverse the 2016 referendum…it does sound like a big admission in this context.
7. Then just when I thought he may qualify this statement he made the claim that, based on the facts, it was the right thing to do…so there must be a ‘but’ somewhere, right?
8. And here it is ‘BUT’ when Theresa May’s deal came we didn’t back it, we damned it, and then supported it on the basis there was a referendum attached.
9. He then goes on to write that the Conservative cabinet and the Labour party hated the idea.
10. Before concluding “So the die was cast. Instead of May’s customs union-based compromise, the parties chose first deadlock” and then an election.
11. He then goes on about party failings and where Labour goes. There is no other reference. It is about the push for a referendum on the May deal.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
12. There is no “big admission” to argue that because people didn’t back Theresa May’s deal that we ended up with the Boris Johnson deal. I'd argue it’s politically over simplified, but inarguable as far as the logic is concerned.
13. It’s no shock to hear that there is causational link with not voting for something and not getting it, and it does not, in any way, prove someone’s paranoid delusions.
14. Just like there is a causational link between over 17 million people voting against the option that guarantees our Single Market access and not having guaranteed Single Market access.
15. There is a causational link between more than 27 million people, over 85% of the electorate, voting for people who stood on manifestos to leave the Single Market and leaving the Single Market.
16. There is not, however, a direct causational link between voting for an election and leaving the Single Market, there is only a direct causational link between voting for an election and...having an election.
17. But there is, and I can't stress this enough, a causational link between nearly 14 million people voting a party into government that says they will leave the Single Market and leaving the Single Market.
18. This may be controversial to some people, but I guarantee that 60 million voting slips marked either to risk or leave the Single Market, are actually pretty relevant…
19. So, I don’t disagree with Peter that by not voting for Theresa May’s deal, the Remainers in parliament ended up with a harder Brexit, but I would argue Peter has made that sound simpler than it actually was.
20. And it is our responsibility to hire, to fire, and those MPs were doing almost exactly what they said they would do.
21. Because democracy means “Rule by people”, and that’s where the buck ends, with the voters.
22. Yes, we are responsible for the fact that Theresa May’s deal didn’t pass, but we are not responsible that the negotiation had to be made, that’s the responsibility of the 17,410,742 people who voted to leave in 2016.
23. We are not responsible for how the deal came out and the fact nobody wanted that deal, that’s the 13,636,684 who voted for the Theresa May to negotiate that deal as part of her Brexit policy.
24. And we are definitely not responsible for the deal we have now, because that is entirely down to the 13,966,454 who voted for Boris Johnson to implement this deal as part of his Brexit policy.
25. As Remainers, I think we can accept our responsibility for not backing a deal so unpopular even the hardest Brexiteers were called traitors when they voted for it.

Wanting more for our country? Yeah, that one’s on us! 🙋‍♂️
27. But that is not an excuse for voters to not own their shit.

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Analyst

Steve Analyst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmporersNewC

6 Dec
Here is an idea:
Instead of the press asking the Prime minister if we will go to no deal if the negotiations fail, they ask him if he will resign if negotiations fail.
He was after all, instrumental in taking us down this path from the beginning.
Read 12 tweets
5 Dec
Oh yeah, the extension. That'll be our fault soon too!
Waiting for the Channel 5 series about how DNA evidence proves that we were Jack the Ripper.
We've all got alibis for the Plymouth Mail Truck Robbery? I mean...I know we didn't do it, but apparently these days that's just not enough.
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec
I thought all those covert marches and the largest petition in history were all under the radar. 🙄

More attacks on Remain today by @jillongovt and @anandMenon1. Is this gong to become a feature?
Just to remind you that Jill's name is on a paper proposing a "Reverse Ukraine" deal.

Does anyone want to know how that works?

Because it doesn't.
In the Ukraine model over time the EU and it's partner get together to agree how they will work more closely together by mutual consent.
Read 13 tweets
2 Dec
Originally Harry came in with false law, and now he is arguing that we would have been held back because the EU countries agreed to take the longer route, but we didn't have to agree...

The whole argument is based around ignoring the counterfactual. These people are imbeciles.
Apart from the fact this is disingenuous because most of the response was down to a rubbish take on the regulation restrictions, which has been quietly swept under the table.
It just ignores the fact we weren't in the room when the decision was made. We don't know what the decision would have been had we been in the room.
Read 9 tweets
2 Dec
France "and other hardline countries". There is only 27 of them. How hard are they to list?

I'd expect more from the newspaper that have been announcing an imminent EU army for the last 11 years.
(I may have just made up that 11 years, but it goes back to some declaration or other before 2010, and they did report that particular event objectively to be fair.)
This is my favourite from the country who have shouted "We're prepared to walk away" for the last 4 years, and I don't remember anyone calling them out and saying "Well that will be a significant miscalculation".

Read 4 tweets
20 Nov
The sign of a weak Prime minister. The honourable resign their posts while the dishonourable keep theirs.
If the press focus on Priti over this, in a week we'll be being told "we have moved on", but if they focus on failure of the Prime minister to sack her, things might be very different.
The Prime minister wants to be seen as a Churchill, while actually just being spoilt, entitled, and lazy. He knows he is all of those things, but insists on trying to cultivate this Churchillian figure who will see us through Brexit.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!