I've gotten a few questions about Aurora Serverless v2 preview, so here's what I've learnt so far. Please feel free to chime in if I've missed anything important or got any of the facts wrong.

Alright, here goes the 🧵...
Q: does it replace the existing Aurora Serverless offering?
A: no, it lives side-by-side with the existing Aurora Serverless, which will still be available to you as "v1".
Q: Aurora Serverless v1 takes a few seconds to scale up, that's too much for our use case where we get a lot of spikes. Is that the same with v2?
A: no, v2 scales up in milliseconds, during preview the max ACU is only 32 though
Q: is the cold start for Aurora Serverless v2 still a few seconds?
A: yes, unfortunately...
Q: so if you want to avoid cold starts, what's the minimum ACU you have to run?
A: minimum ACU with v2 is 0.5
Q: does v2 still scale up in double increments, e.g. 4 ACU -> 8 ACU?
A: no, it scales up in increments of 0.5 ACUs, so it's a much tighter fit for your workload, so you'll waste less money on over-provisioned ACUs
Q: is there anything I can do with v2 that I can't do with v1?
A: yes, v2 supports all the Aurora features, including those that v1 is missing, such as global database, IAM auth and Lambda triggers
Q: wait, but it's twice as much per ACU!
A: yes, but v1 requires a lot of over-provisioning because it doubles ACU each time and takes 15 mins to scale down. v2 scales in 0.5 ACU increments and scales down in < 1 min. AND you get all the Aurora features!
Q: can you use "provisioned" and "serverless" instances in the same Aurora cluster?
A: yes you can! cool, right!?
Q: is data API supported on v2?
A: not in the preview, I'm guessing it'll be there in GA
Q: if using from Lambda, do I need to use RDS Proxy to manage the connections to the cluster? Data API kinda mitigated that for v1..
A: yes, you probably should, until data API is enabled on v2, otherwise, more connections = more ACUs, it can run you into trouble
did I miss anything? plz feel free to chimp in

@jeremy_daly has written a nice summary post on this too, with a nice experiment on the scaling behaviour of v2, so check it out if you haven't already jeremydaly.com/aurora-serverl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yan Cui is making the AppSync Masterclass

Yan Cui is making the AppSync Masterclass Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @theburningmonk

6 Dec
Stitching together my previous tweets on @dyanacek's session (BLD205) on "Monitoring production services at Amazon" so it's easier to share

#aws #reinvent2020

virtual.awsevents.com/media/1_4nwtxc…
"For amazon.com we found the "above the fold" latency is what customers are the most sensitive to" Image
This is an interesting insight, that not all service latencies are equal and that improving the overall page latency might actually end up hurting the user experience if it negatively impacts the "above the fold" latency as a result. 💡
Read 8 tweets
5 Dec
If you missed @clare_liguori's Continuous Delivery session this week (like I did) then good news, it's available on-demand now 🎊

virtual.awsevents.com/media/1_ua3d99…

And here's my play-by-play for the session

🧵...
This is a typical CD pipeline in AWS.

This is far more complex than the most complex CD pipeline I have ever had! Just cos it's complex, doesn't mean it's over-engineered though. Given the blast radius, I'm glad they do releases carefully and safely.
If you look closely, beyond all the alpha, beta, gamma environments, it's one-box in a region first then the rest of the region, I assume starting with the least risky regions first.
Read 30 tweets
3 Dec
Great overview of permission management in AWS by @bjohnso5y (SEC308)

Lots of tools to secure your AWS environment (maybe that's why it's so hard to get right, lots of things to consider) but I love how it starts with "separate workloads using multiple accounts" Image
SCP for org-wide restrictions (e.g. Deny ec2:* 😉).

IAM perm boundary to stop ppl from creating permissions that exceed their own.

block S3 public access

These are the things that deny access to things (hence guardrails)

Use IAM principal and resource policies to grant perms ImageImage
"You should be using roles so you can focus on temporary credentials" 👍

Shouldn't be using IAM users and groups anymore, go set up AWS SSO and throw away the password for the root user (and use the forgotten password mechanism if you need to recover access)
Read 13 tweets
3 Dec
Great session by @MarcJBrooker earlier on building technology standards at Amazon scale, and some interesting tidbits about the secret sauce behind Lambda and how they make technology choices - e.g. in whether to use Rust for the stateful load balancer v2 for Lambda.

🧵
Nice shout out to some of the benefits of Rust - no GC (good for p99+ percentile latency), memory safety with its ownership system theburningmonk.com/2015/05/rust-m… great support for multi-threading (which still works with the ownership system)
And why not to use Rust.

The interesting Q is how to balance technical strengths vs weaknesses that are more organizational.
Read 20 tweets
2 Dec
This is part 2 of my #aws #reinvent hot takes on the big #serverless related announcements.

Part 1 is here for anyone who missed it:

Same deal as before, if this gets 168 retweets then I'll do another batch 👍

Alright, here comes the mega 🧵...
1. Lambda now bills you by the ms as opposed to 100 ms. So if your function runs for 42ms you will be billed for 42ms, not 100ms.

This instantly makes everyone's lambda bills cheaper without having to lift a finger. It's the best kind of optimization 😎

aws.amazon.com/about-aws/what…
However, this might not mean much in practice for a lot of you because your Lambda bill is $5/month, so saving even 50% only buys you a cup of Starbucks coffee a month.

Still, that's a FREE cup of coffee!

However...
Read 44 tweets
1 Dec
Given all the excitement over Lambda's per-ms billing change today, some of you might be thinking how much money you can save by shaving 10ms off your function.

Fight that temptation 🧘‍♂️until you can prove the ROI on doing the optimization.

#serverless #aws #awslambda
The moral of this tweet is as relevant now as ever:

Assuming $50 (which is VERY conservative) per dev per hour, it would have taken them 40 months to break even on just having the meeting, before writing a single line of code!
With the per-ms billing, you're automatically saving on your Lambda cost already, by NOT having your invocation time rounded up to the next 100ms.

Unless you're invoking a function at such high frequency, those micro-optimizations won't be worth the eng time you have to invest.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!