I create intermediate packets because they help me to:
• Provide value more often
• Become interruption-proof
• Create in any circumstance
• Stay motivated
• Help my future self
• Get more and better feedback
• Avoid heavy lifts
Intermediate packets help me provide value more often.
As a knowledge worker, I only create value when my output is used by someone else. I'm in the business of ideas, but if nobody uses them, my work is useless.
Shorter bursts of output give me more opportunities to help.
Intermediate packets make me interruption- proof.
Working with knowledge means using your fragile working memory. The fuller that memory, the more impactful distractions.
Narrowing the work scope and externalizing it, it's easier to return to your work after an interruption.
Intermediate packets help me create regardless of circumstances.
Small, clearly scoped pieces of work enable me to match tasks to my current environment and energy level. The only condition for a working session is that I produce something I can ship, no matter how small.
Intermediate packets keep me motivated.
Finishing up work more often and shipping it out for feedback is scary but also a powerful motivator. I have something to show, and the feedback makes it better.
Intermediate packets help my future self.
My future self is just as much a reality for me as other people are. Whatever I produce is not only useful for others but also for myself.
Sending valuable packages through time, I make my own life easier.
Intermediate packets get me more and better feedback.
People are more willing to provide feedback when it's a draft and requires just a few minutes of their time.
Bonus points if I can make people feel heard and show that they influenced the final deliverable.
Intermediate packets make heavy lifts a thing of the past.
When delivering a project, I don't need to do a big final push. Projects are a series of short loops where I produce or repurpose knowledge, share it, and integrate the feedback. I simply assemble pieces at the end.
These are my reasons for doing work in intermediate packets.
This idea of creating smaller deliverables was taught to me by @fortelabs. His article on bending your productivity curves is worth reading if you want to get deeper into the why of this all. medium.com/praxis-blog/be…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In week 2 of @ness_labs' phenomenal Collector to Creator course, we learned how to collect ideas, make sense of them in our specific context, and share our insights.
🧵 A thread with my key takeaways.
There are two modes of thinking:
1) Focused thinking—a conscious process of thinking around one idea.
2) Diffuse thinking—a subconscious process of thinking freely and connecting ideas.
We need both to go from note-taking (focused) to note-making (diffuse, then focused again).
For creative inspiration, we need to take time for three things:
• Ideation based on what we read, see, and experience.
• Introspection using journaling (self-reflection) and meditation.
• Idleness to allow time off from focused thinking and let diffuse thinking take over.
Since I've started to use Roam, my writing process has become a breeze.
My database is my conversation partner, and by combining my notes, I feel more like a curator. This process is influenced by @fortelabs and @soenke_ahrens.
While many people use Roam to do their research and organize their notes, few write entire articles in it.
I believe Roam's block-based architecture makes it the perfect end-to-end writing tool. Editing becomes a breeze!
My writing process has 10 (small) steps:
1. Read. 2. Link. 3. Progressive summarization. 4. Collect blocks. 5. Group and summarize. 6. Create headings. 7. Sequence blocks. 8. Draft based on summaries. 9. Leave, then reread and rearrange. 10. Proofread and ship.
That's the question we made sense of in the first week of @ness_labs' phenomenal Collector to Creator course.
Metacognition is an essential tool if you want to become a better thinker, learner, and creator.
A 🧵 thinking about thinking.
Cognition is the mental process that helps us gain knowledge and solve problems.
Metacognition means that you look at those cognitive processes so you can get better at them. It's thinking about thinking, learning about learning, knowing about knowing.
Metacognition has three parts, together forming the metacognitive loop:
• Metacognitive knowledge—understanding cognitive processes.
• Metacognitive regulation—understanding how you learn.
• Metacognitive experience—becoming aware of emotions during learning.
When most online courses are created by marketeers (not domain experts), that's a tough question.
In search of an answer, a few of us learning geeks got together recently for a workshop hosted by @bazzuto.
A 🧵 with my takeaways.
Let's start with a definition. What's a transformational (online) course?
To me, it's a program that helps you through a series of steps that ultimately cause you to see the world with different eyes and/or change your behavior in ways you held as impossible before.
Many are misguided about what works to learn languages to fluency.
Between 2007 and 2012, I lived for acquiring Spanish to a near-native level. I tried all the stuff that the commenters suggest, but most of it doesn't work.
My language learning principles are:
• Language acquisition > language learning.
• Input > output.
• Have fun.
• Use materials for natives by natives.
• Boost comprehension with a spaced repetition system.
• Don’t study grammar; only review it once you’re functional.
Aim for language acquisition over language learning.
When *learning* a language, you consciously memorize words and rules. This never leads to fluency.
When you *acquire* a language, you feed your subconscious and rewire your brain for new structures. This leads to fluency.