1/I'm enduring a 14-days quarantine, and I have a lot of spare time. So I will bring you around in a virtual quick and non-exhaustive tour of the variety of "rural" housing typologies of Italy, because, sometimes, we say "rural" in a too generic way among urbanists' circles.
2/ Those types are the result of the interplaying evolution of the prevailing type of cultivation, in a given area (rice, wheat, orchards, etc.) and the related tenure (large monoculture estates vs small independent ownership vs communal shared land for pasture etc.)
3/ To clarify, I'm talking here only of the sparse, isolated farm-type housing, not villages, hamlets or other clustered rural housing, that is different story. Again, you can see the typical North/South, mountain/plain divide that is typical of the whole story of Italy
4/ Let's start from the "Dimore a corte" a large family of communal leaving in the "irrigated plain" in some sectors of the Po' valley, dominated by the rice pads and the "marcite" a sort of partly inundated grass field for stock farming.
5/ The labor- and capital-intensive nature of this cultivations (continuously maintained waterworks, hand planting of rice, etc.) Required seasonal concentration of workers in communal living. The typical example, in Lombardy and Piedmont is the "Cascina" or "Corte lombarda"
6/ The typical cascina is a group of buildings clustered around a rectangular courtyard, housing living quarters for agricultural workers and their family (and beasts), stables, storage, granaries etc.
7/ Again in the North, but in areas of "non-irrigated plain" or hills, where small ownership or sharecropping were prevalent for wheat, corn, fruit, wine etc., isolated buildings ("casolari") for enlarged families were the norm. Their form varies largely among regions
8/ In the hilly/mountain areas, with colder weather and poorer crops (corn) and wood-oriented agriculture (typically chestnut), they tended to cluster in small, 3-5 homes hamlets with related family groups. Nowadays, many are abandoned, as the Apennines depopulates.
9/ As you move up in the Alps, the isolated house became more rare, as people lived in bottom valley villages during winter while moving in higher altitude pastures (alpeggi) during summer. There you can find Malghe or Casere (Alms in German), summer-only rural living
10/ Moving south, it's the very large, aristocratic estate that dominates the landscape. The typical building is the "Masseria", similar to the "Cascina" as a communal living space for agricultural laborers. The main difference is that the Masseria is a temporary living space
11/ The typical wheat/olive crop, needing intensive labor mostly in the short harvest/ planting seasons, resulted in high seasonality: those isolated masserie were inhabited for only a few months, while the laborers mostly returned to villages, where the family lived permanently
12/ This resulted in the typical compact form of most towns and villages in the Puglia's plains or in central Sicily (Campania is a bit different, more orchard dominated). a stark contrats from the more dispersed rural living of most of the North.
13/ Sardinia is yet another, remote world. The sheep and goat herding that dominates the sparsely populated inner plateau is scattered with "stazzu", small and simple stone made shelters for frequently moving, live-alone shepherds
14/ Finally, a particular type of "rural" housing, indeed quite common in the immediate surroundings of cities: the peri-urban villas of the mercantile urban gentry that surrounds many cities, notably Florence, Rome, inland Veneto. A getaway from city life, and occasional plagues
15/ Many cities were literally surrounded by hectares of large, gardened or orchard cultivated estates. The main parks of today's Rome are the pale remains, a fraction of a "green belt" of villas and parks, while most of them survived around Florence and still ornate its hills
16/ Many of this rural houses, abandoned over time, got a new life as second-homes of Northern Europeans (and a few North-Americans), that started colonizing rural Tuscany in the 1970s, and then spread to Umbria, Marche, Piedmont, Puglia, making it a pricey commodity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/How could service look like on the broad Northeast corridor if we apply the multi-tiered service patterns (and fares) currently in use in N-Italy and in the Germanic world?
A long thread with some random thoughts of how a better region-wide NE rail service should look like
2/ This thread comes after some exchanges in here over time and the discover of this private sector proposal for an improved Northeast corridor, that have some good points but fails at the overall picture. railwayage.com/passenger/inte…
3/ Let's start from the inspiring model. Both Germany and Italy have a strongly multitiered rail service pattern that particularly suits the travel demand of "megalopolis", i.e. continuously urbanized areas with many important primary and secondary nodes, as the US Northeast.
Genova (Genoa), the "Superba", a city whose urban history is definitely shaped by its geography and the fact of being a place of passage for the movements of goods for centuries.
A story of tunnels, ships and trains
2/ Genova is one of the Maritime Republics and, after Venice, the most important maritime power in the western Mediterranean sea for several centuries, a city of bankers and merchants. With no surprise, the symbol of the city is its 15th century lighthouse, the "Lanterna"
3/ Constrained between the Apennines and the sea, along the rugged coast of Liguria, it was not in a good position for the steam age. There were no inland water routes to connect the city easily with its natural hinterland: the Po valley, Turin, Milan, Switzerland and S Germany.
You know why this insistence on the 15-minute city gets on my nerves? Because the problem of US and Canadian planning is not the lack of yet another grand discursive vision, that are quite abundant, but of the technical and juridical tools to achieve whatever vision.
I understand the appeal of a city favoring a proximity, car-less life. But from urban villages on, this is the core of the urbanist discourse. We know what we would like cities to look like. We can rebrand it how many times you want to sell it better, but the core idea is there.
The problem is that there are little tools for planners to make those visions actually come true, because of the lack of operational non-regulatory instruments, an outdated, hyperlocalist regulatory tool for uses (zoning), and the persistence of a car centered road design culture
I was lazily listening to the news and the US political debate and I cannot avoid myself to think how there is a sort of national "psychology" that shape the political discourse.
That is a sort of MAGA syndrome for Americans and a WAGAW one for Italians. I'll explain.
I doesn't matter the fact that Trump appropriated for himself the MAGA slogan, but the idea of Greatness, of being or having been or going back to be a Great Nation is a very American bipartisan obsession. And it's not only about foreign policy, the leader of the free world etc.
Take Biden's plan for railways: Given the current state of US passengers rail, he could content himself to call for a better/improved rail service. Instead, he calls for a "plan to ensure that America has the cleanest, safest, and fastest rail system in the world." No less.
I was roaming around the excellent @yfreemark 's Transit Explorer 2 expansion to Europe and N-Africa and I started asking myself: is it correct to label TER as commuter rail? is even possible to have consistent categories across the Pond?
A distraction thread for transit twitter
First, I'm not even trying to figure out if LRTs are the same as modern French tramways or if a legacy tramway network like the one in Milan is more like a streetcar or an LRT, as some sections are more on the LRT side of the spectrum, with at grade but segregated RoW and long RS
My question is more about regional/commuter rail. I'm not even talking about the timetable pattern (all-day frequent vs peak only), but the extent of this definition as applied to Europe. Are French TER or Italian regional trains services like Metro-North, LIRR, NJT or MBTA?
1/ There is not much innovation coming from Italy, honestly. My home country is generally a laggard.
But the recent overhaul of mobility planning started with the creation of PUMSs is, I believe, an exciting example of how mobility planning should look like. A thread.
2/ PUMS (Piano Urbano della Mobilità Sostenibile) - Urban Plan for Sustainable Mobility, is the new planning tool introduced in the Italian legislation in the past decade. All the 14 major metropolitan areas + cities bigger of a certain threshold must draw one.
3/ PUMS per se are not an Italian invention, but the Italian application of a mid 2000s EU "white paper" about planning and mobility and how it can contribute in the effort to curb GHG emission and improve overall quality of urban life through a better mobility.