Thread by @JuliaBerkowitz1

Wade Robson's book draft is more evidence of how he created his narratives using textbooks. This part is from a book called "Conversations with a Pedophile". He recommended it on his old website. It's that book where the pedophile in question is called Alan.

Wade here completely cherry picks that book trying to make a connection between Alan and MJ. If you ever read that book in full you know this is complete BS.

A lot of people feel different and isolated. That doesn't make anyone a pedophile. So nice try, Wade, but this is not evidence of pedophilia. I actually read that book and I know it very well. Alan's story is COMPLETELY different to what Wade alleges.

Back in 2014, when I read that book I actually made notes of it, so let me share those notes with you now.

Why does a real victim of sexual abuse need to compile lists like this, based on textbooks about CSA? Is he telling his supposed story or is he trying to adopt someone else's story, trying to make up a story for himself? The question was rhetorical.

When someone tells their own story they just tell their own story, they don't feel the embed it into and keep always references someone else's story or CSA literature. If anyone knows anything about narcissistic liars, this is typical of their behavior.

Of course, this is not the only book Wade used to construct his story. He used lots of CSA literature. As @Keb_187 pointed out, some of his allegations also echo the book "Victims No Longer" which Wade also admittedly read.

https://twitter.com/Keb_187/status/1335770557292441603

So when people watch LN and see familiar elements of CSA there and think that's "evidence" of the story being true, remind them that this is a guy (and his sidekick) who spent more than a year just with reading this kind of material and create a story out of it.

This is also odd, because this was a book draft that he actually shopped to publishers. Seeing this nonsense, no wonder all of them declined, but I wonder, again: what's the point in mixing his alleged story with someone else's completely different story.

What's the point of going on about Alan in his book? It's like he is trying to convince his readers of his allegations by comparing them to someone else's case. This is truly bizarre. I have never seen that from any real victim.

Real victims just tell their story is it happened, and that's it. They don't create elaborate checklists of how their case supposedly is similar to another case to convince their audience.

And notice the manipulative nature of him trying to use MJ's eccentricity as evidence of pedophilia! This is good old witch hunt tactics. Use someone's difference and eccentricity against them to make people believe they are criminals.